• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)指南的熟悉程度、继续教育以及医疗服务提供者的特征是否会影响对慢性疼痛管理实践和阿片类药物处方的依从性?

Does familiarity with CDC guidelines, continuing education, and provider characteristics influence adherence to chronic pain management practices and opioid prescribing?

作者信息

McCalmont Jean C, Jones Kim D, Bennett Robert M, Friend Ronald

机构信息

Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.

出版信息

J Opioid Manag. 2018 Mar-Apr;14(2):103-116. doi: 10.5055/jom.2018.0437.

DOI:10.5055/jom.2018.0437
PMID:29733096
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

(1) To assess providers' experience and knowledge of chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) management. (2) To assess providers' utilization of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2016 Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain. (3) To assess the influence of the 2016 CDC guideline on provider confidence in managing CNCP and adherence to the CDC recommendations.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, web-based survey conducted with 417 Oregon prescribing providers, divided into three continuing medical education (CME) groups composed of minimal (0-3), moderate (4-10), and high (≥11) hours of training.

RESULTS

The three CME groups were associated with increased use of CDC opioid recommended practices (29.4, 34.2, 38.8; p = 0.001; scale 0-50), opioid conversion confidence (5.5, 6.5, 7.4; p < 0.001; scale 0-9), and confidence in pain management (5.5, 5.9, 6.9; p < 0.001, scale 0-9). Slightly more providers utilized CDC recommended practices than did not (57 vs 43 percent). However, CME groups differed substantially in utilization of CDC practices (42 vs 57 vs 72 percent; p < 0.001). Neither providers' profession (physician vs nurse practitioner [NP]) nor geographic setting (urban vs rural) showed differences in use of recommended practices or general confident in pain management (all p > 0.05); however, physicians were slightly more confident in opioid dose conversion than NPs (6.9 vs 5.9; p < 0. 001, scale 0-9).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher hours of recent CME positively benefit provider confidence in pain management and utilization of CDC recommended practices. NPs and rural providers were equivalent to their physician and urban counterparts on confidence and adherence to CDC practices, with minor exceptions.

摘要

目的

(1)评估医疗服务提供者对慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)管理的经验和知识。(2)评估医疗服务提供者对疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)2016年慢性疼痛阿片类药物处方指南的应用情况。(3)评估2016年CDC指南对医疗服务提供者管理CNCP的信心以及对CDC建议的遵循情况的影响。

方法

对417名俄勒冈州的处方开具者进行了一项基于网络的横断面调查,这些开具者被分为三个继续医学教育(CME)组,分别是接受最少(0 - 3小时)、中等(4 - 10小时)和高(≥11小时)培训时长的组。

结果

三个CME组在使用CDC阿片类药物推荐做法(29.4、34.2、38.8;p = 0.001;范围0 - 50)、阿片类药物转换信心(5.5、6.5、7.4;p < 0.001;范围0 - 9)以及疼痛管理信心(5.5、5.9、6.9;p < 0.001,范围0 - 9)方面均有所增加。使用CDC推荐做法的医疗服务提供者略多于未使用者(57%对43%)。然而,CME组在CDC做法的应用上存在显著差异(42%对57%对72%;p < 0.001)。医疗服务提供者的职业(医生与执业护士[NP])和地理位置(城市与农村)在推荐做法的使用或疼痛管理的总体信心方面均未显示出差异(所有p > 0.05);然而,医生在阿片类药物剂量转换方面比NP略更有信心(6.9对5.9;p < 0.001,范围0 - 9)。

结论

近期CME培训时长越高,对医疗服务提供者在疼痛管理方面的信心以及对CDC推荐做法的应用有积极益处。NP和农村地区的医疗服务提供者在对CDC做法的信心和遵循方面与医生和城市地区的同行相当,仅有一些小的例外情况。

相似文献

1
Does familiarity with CDC guidelines, continuing education, and provider characteristics influence adherence to chronic pain management practices and opioid prescribing?对美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)指南的熟悉程度、继续教育以及医疗服务提供者的特征是否会影响对慢性疼痛管理实践和阿片类药物处方的依从性?
J Opioid Manag. 2018 Mar-Apr;14(2):103-116. doi: 10.5055/jom.2018.0437.
2
Attitudes, Beliefs, Practices, and Concerns Among Clinicians Prescribing Opioids in a Large Academic Institution.在一所大型学术机构中,开具阿片类药物的临床医生的态度、信念、实践和关注点。
Pain Med. 2018 Sep 1;19(9):1790-1798. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx140.
3
Using the CDC Guideline and Tools for Opioid Prescribing in Patients with Chronic Pain.使用美国疾病控制与预防中心慢性疼痛患者阿片类药物处方指南及工具。
Am Fam Physician. 2016 Jun 15;93(12):970-2.
4
Targeted Program in an Academic Rheumatology Practice to Improve Compliance With Opioid Prescribing Guidelines for the Treatment of Chronic Pain.学术风湿病实践中的靶向项目,以提高治疗慢性疼痛的阿片类药物处方指南的依从性。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Oct;73(10):1425-1429. doi: 10.1002/acr.24354. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
5
CDC Develops Guideline for Opioid Prescribing.美国疾病控制与预防中心制定阿片类药物处方指南。
Am Fam Physician. 2016 Jun 15;93(12):1042-3.
6
Changes in Initial Opioid Prescribing Practices After the 2016 Release of the CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain.《2016 年美国疾病预防控制中心发布慢性疼痛阿片类药物处方指南后初始阿片类药物处方实践的变化》。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2116860. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16860.
7
Beliefs and attitudes about opioid prescribing and chronic pain management: survey of primary care providers.关于阿片类药物处方和慢性疼痛管理的信念与态度:初级保健提供者调查
J Opioid Manag. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):375-82. doi: 10.5055/jom.2014.0234.
8
Vital Signs: Changes in Opioid Prescribing in the United States, 2006-2015.生命体征:2006 - 2015年美国阿片类药物处方的变化
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Jul 7;66(26):697-704. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6626a4.
9
When human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment goals conflict with guideline-based opioid prescribing: A qualitative study of HIV treatment providers.当人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)治疗目标与基于指南的阿片类药物处方发生冲突时:对HIV治疗提供者的定性研究。
Subst Abus. 2016;37(1):148-53. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2015.1129391.
10
[CDC guidelines for prescribing opioids for chronic pain].[美国疾病控制与预防中心慢性疼痛阿片类药物处方指南]
Semergen. 2017 May-Jun;43(4):e53-e54. doi: 10.1016/j.semerg.2016.04.013. Epub 2016 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The perpetual evidence-practice gap: addressing ongoing barriers to chronic pain management in primary care in three steps.长期存在的证据与实践差距:分三步解决初级保健中慢性疼痛管理的持续障碍。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 8;5:1376462. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1376462. eCollection 2024.
2
'What script am I meant to use?': a qualitative study in chronic primary pain.“我该用什么字体?”:一项关于慢性原发性疼痛的定性研究
BJGP Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(4). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0101. Print 2024 Dec.
3
High-Dose Opioid Prescribing in Individuals with Acute Pain: Assessing the Effects of US State Opioid Policies.
高剂量阿片类药物处方用于急性疼痛患者:评估美国州阿片类药物政策的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Nov;39(14):2689-2697. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08947-9. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
4
Drug-related physician continuing medical education requirements, 2010-2020.2010-2020 年与药物相关的医师继续医学教育要求。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Jun;161:209356. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209356. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
5
A cross-sectional survey exploring clinician perceptions of a novel Medicaid back pain policy.一项探索临床医生对新的医疗补助腰痛政策看法的横断面调查。
J Complement Integr Med. 2022 Oct 31;20(2):438-446. doi: 10.1515/jcim-2022-0213. eCollection 2023 Jun 1.
6
The relationship between patients' income and education and their access to pharmacological chronic pain management: A scoping review.患者的收入和教育水平与其获得慢性疼痛药物治疗的关系:一项范围综述。
Can J Pain. 2022 Sep 1;6(1):142-170. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2022.2104699. eCollection 2022.
7
The Role of Informatics in Implementing Guidelines for Chronic Opioid Therapy Risk Assessment in Primary Care: A Narrative Review Informed by the Socio-Technical Model.信息学在实施初级保健慢性阿片类药物治疗风险评估指南中的作用:基于社会技术模型的叙述性综述。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 6;290:447-451. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220115.
8
Adherence to Analgesics Among Outpatients Seriously Ill With Cancer.癌症晚期门诊患者的镇痛药依从性。
Cancer Nurs. 2022;45(5):337-344. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000001064. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
9
Opioid Prescribing Habits in a Family Medicine Residency Program for the Management of Non-Cancer Pain.家庭医学住院医师培训项目中用于非癌性疼痛管理的阿片类药物处方习惯
Innov Pharm. 2019 Aug 31;10(2). doi: 10.24926/iip.v10i2.1149. eCollection 2019.
10
Study protocol: randomized controlled trial of opioid-free vs. traditional perioperative analgesia in elective orthopedic surgery.研究方案:择期骨科手术中无阿片类药物与传统围手术期镇痛的随机对照试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jan 23;22(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-03972-9.