a Centre Antipoison-Toxicovigilance Grand Ouest , CHU Angers , Angers , France.
b Laboratoire de Pharmacologie-Toxicologie , CHU Angers , Angers , France.
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2018 Nov;56(11):1150-1154. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2018.1469758. Epub 2018 May 9.
We report two cases of elevated digoxin plasma levels in patients receiving enzalutamide. The first patient, an 84-year-old male treated with enzalutamide, was hospitalized due to deterioration in his general state. Atrial fibrillation was discovered and treatment with digoxin was initiated. Supratherapeutic digoxin concentrations (4 µg/L and 3.5 µg/L 3 days later) led to treatment being stopped despite the lack of clinical or biological signs of overdose. The second patient, an 84-year-old male treated with digoxin and enzalutamide, was hospitalized for the same reasons. Digoxin concentration upon admission was 2.8 μg/L. Despite stopping treatment, digoxin blood levels were observed to have increased on D3 and D7 following admission (3 and 3.6 μg/L, respectively). However, no clinical or biological findings indicated an overdose. Blood samples were sent to the Pharmacology and Toxicology Laboratory for analysis. The second patient's digoxin plasma level was determined using the chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA®, Abbott, Illinois) method. Enzalutamide levels were determined using HPLC-UV/DAD method. An interference study was performed using different assay methods by adding enzalutamide to control plasma at various concentrations from a Xtandi (40mg) capsule. Plasma concentration of digoxin at D7 for patient 2 was identical in both laboratories (3.5 vs. 3.6 µg/L). Enzalutamide was found in the patient's plasma (12,5 mg/L). Adding 4, 10, 20, and 40 mg/L of enzalutamide to the untreated plasma showed that the plasma concentration of digoxin was positive (from 0.35 to 3.69 µg/L) using the CMIA method. Our results highlight the analytical interferences of enzalutamide with digoxin assays using the CMIA method.
我们报告了两例接受恩扎卢胺治疗的患者出现地高辛血药浓度升高的病例。第一例患者为 84 岁男性,因一般状况恶化而住院。发现心房颤动后开始用地高辛治疗。尽管没有临床或生物学过量的迹象,但由于地高辛浓度高于治疗范围(3 天后分别为 4μg/L 和 3.5μg/L),地高辛治疗被停止。第二例患者为 84 岁男性,同时接受地高辛和恩扎卢胺治疗,因同样的原因住院。入院时地高辛浓度为 2.8μg/L。尽管停止了治疗,但入院后第 3 天和第 7 天观察到地高辛血药浓度升高(分别为 3 和 3.6μg/L)。然而,没有临床或生物学发现表明存在过量。采集血样送往药理学和毒理学实验室进行分析。第二例患者的地高辛血浆水平采用化学发光微粒子免疫分析(CMIA®,雅培,伊利诺伊州)方法进行测定。恩扎卢胺水平采用高效液相色谱-紫外/可见分光光度法(HPLC-UV/DAD)方法进行测定。通过用不同的测定方法向对照血浆中加入不同浓度的安可坦(40mg 胶囊)中的恩扎卢胺,对其进行了干扰研究。患者 2 第 7 天的地高辛血浆浓度在两个实验室中相同(3.5 与 3.6μg/L)。在患者的血浆中发现了恩扎卢胺(12.5mg/L)。在未处理的血浆中加入 4、10、20 和 40mg/L 的恩扎卢胺,用 CMIA 法显示地高辛的血浆浓度呈阳性(从 0.35 至 3.69μg/L)。我们的研究结果强调了恩扎卢胺对 CMIA 法测定地高辛的分析干扰。