Woytowicz Elizabeth J, Westlake Kelly P, Whitall Jill, Sainburg Robert L
Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Health Sciences, University of Southampton , Southampton , United Kingdom.
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Aug 1;120(2):729-740. doi: 10.1152/jn.00878.2017. Epub 2018 May 9.
Two contrasting views of handedness can be described as 1) complementary dominance, in which each hemisphere is specialized for different aspects of motor control, and 2) global dominance, in which the hemisphere contralateral to the dominant arm is specialized for all aspects of motor control. The present study sought to determine which motor lateralization hypothesis best predicts motor performance during common bilateral task of stabilizing an object (e.g., bread) with one hand while applying forces to the object (e.g., slicing) using the other hand. We designed an experimental equivalent of this task, performed in a virtual environment with the unseen arms supported by frictionless air-sleds. The hands were connected by a spring, and the task was to maintain the position of one hand while moving the other hand to a target. Thus the reaching hand was required to take account of the spring load to make smooth and accurate trajectories, while the stabilizer hand was required to impede the spring load to keep a constant position. Right-handed subjects performed two task sessions (right-hand reach and left-hand stabilize; left-hand reach and right-hand stabilize) with the order of the sessions counterbalanced between groups. Our results indicate a hand by task-component interaction such that the right hand showed straighter reaching performance whereas the left hand showed more stable holding performance. These findings provide support for the complementary dominance hypothesis and suggest that the specializations of each cerebral hemisphere for impedance and dynamic control mechanisms are expressed during bilateral interactive tasks. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We provide evidence for interlimb differences in bilateral coordination of reaching and stabilizing functions, demonstrating an advantage for the dominant and nondominant arms for distinct features of control. These results provide the first evidence for complementary specializations of each limb-hemisphere system for different aspects of control within the context of a complementary bilateral task.
关于利手有两种截然不同的观点,可以描述为:1)互补性优势,即每个半球专门负责运动控制的不同方面;2)整体性优势,即与优势手臂对侧的半球专门负责运动控制的所有方面。本研究旨在确定哪种运动侧化假说最能预测在常见的双侧任务中的运动表现,该任务是用一只手稳定一个物体(如面包),同时用另一只手对该物体施加力(如切片)。我们设计了这个任务的实验等效物,在虚拟环境中进行,看不见的手臂由无摩擦的气垫支撑。双手通过弹簧连接,任务是在移动另一只手到目标时保持一只手的位置。因此,伸展的手需要考虑弹簧负荷以做出平滑且准确的轨迹,而稳定的手则需要抵抗弹簧负荷以保持恒定位置。右利手受试者进行了两个任务环节(右手伸展和左手稳定;左手伸展和右手稳定),环节顺序在组间进行了平衡。我们的结果表明了手与任务组成部分之间的相互作用,即右手表现出更直的伸展表现,而左手表现出更稳定的握持表现。这些发现为互补性优势假说提供了支持,并表明在双侧交互任务中,每个大脑半球在阻抗和动态控制机制方面的专门化得以体现。新内容与值得注意之处 我们为伸手和稳定功能双侧协调中的肢体差异提供了证据,证明了优势手臂和非优势手臂在不同控制特征方面的优势。这些结果为在互补性双侧任务背景下,每个肢体 - 半球系统在控制的不同方面的互补专门化提供了首个证据。