Department of Kinesiology, Pennsylvania State University, 29 Recreation Bldg, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Brain. 2013 Apr;136(Pt 4):1288-303. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws283. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
We have proposed a model of motor lateralization, in which the left and right hemispheres are specialized for different aspects of motor control: the left hemisphere for predicting and accounting for limb dynamics and the right hemisphere for stabilizing limb position through impedance control mechanisms. Our previous studies, demonstrating different motor deficits in the ipsilesional arm of stroke patients with left or right hemisphere damage, provided a critical test of our model. However, motor deficits after stroke are most prominent on the contralesional side. Post-stroke rehabilitation has also, naturally, focused on improving contralesional arm impairment and function. Understanding whether contralesional motor deficits differ depending on the hemisphere of damage is, therefore, of vital importance for assessing the impact of brain damage on function and also for designing rehabilitation interventions specific to laterality of damage. We, therefore, asked whether motor deficits in the contralesional arm of unilateral stroke patients reflect hemisphere-dependent control mechanisms. Because our model of lateralization predicts that contralesional deficits will differ depending on the hemisphere of damage, this study also served as an essential assessment of our model. Stroke patients with mild to moderate hemiparesis in either the left or right arm because of contralateral stroke and healthy control subjects performed targeted multi-joint reaching movements in different directions. As predicted, our results indicated a double dissociation; although left hemisphere damage was associated with greater errors in trajectory curvature and movement direction, errors in movement extent were greatest after right hemisphere damage. Thus, our results provide the first demonstration of hemisphere specific motor control deficits in the contralesional arm of stroke patients. Our results also suggest that it is critical to consider the differential deficits induced by right or left hemisphere lesions to enhance post-stroke rehabilitation interventions.
我们提出了一种运动侧化模型,其中左半球和右半球专门用于控制运动的不同方面:左半球用于预测和解释肢体动力学,右半球用于通过阻抗控制机制稳定肢体位置。我们之前的研究表明,左半球或右半球损伤的脑卒中患者偏瘫侧手臂存在不同的运动缺陷,这为我们的模型提供了重要的检验。然而,脑卒中后的运动缺陷在对侧更为明显。脑卒中后的康复治疗自然也集中在改善对侧手臂的损伤和功能上。因此,了解对侧运动缺陷是否因损伤的半球而不同,对于评估大脑损伤对功能的影响以及设计针对损伤侧别的康复干预措施至关重要。因此,我们想知道单侧脑卒中患者对侧手臂的运动缺陷是否反映了半球依赖的控制机制。由于我们的侧化模型预测对侧缺陷将因损伤的半球而异,因此这项研究也是对我们模型的重要评估。由于对侧脑卒中导致轻至中度偏瘫的脑卒中患者和健康对照组在不同方向进行了有针对性的多关节伸展运动。正如预测的那样,我们的结果表明了一种双重分离;尽管左半球损伤与轨迹曲率和运动方向的更大误差相关,但右半球损伤后运动幅度的误差最大。因此,我们的结果首次证明了脑卒中患者对侧手臂存在特定于半球的运动控制缺陷。我们的结果还表明,必须考虑右半球或左半球损伤引起的差异缺陷,以增强脑卒中后的康复干预措施。