• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用巴西版行为疼痛量表对创伤性脑损伤患者进行疼痛评估。

Pain assessment of traumatic brain injury victims using the Brazilian version of the Behavioral Pain Scale.

作者信息

Ribeiro Caíque Jordan Nunes, Araújo Andra Carla Santos de, Brito Saulo Barreto, Dantas Daniele Vieira, Nunes Mariangela da Silva, Alves José Antonio Barreto, Ribeiro Maria do Carmo de Oliveira

机构信息

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil.

Departamento de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2018 Mar;30(1):42-49. doi: 10.5935/0103-507x.20180009.

DOI:10.5935/0103-507x.20180009
PMID:29742216
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5885230/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS-Br) in victims of traumatic brain injury.

METHODS

Observational prospective study with paired and repeated measures conducted at two intensive care units (clinical and surgical) of a large general hospital. The convenience sample consisted of adult victims of moderate or severe penetrating or blunt craniocerebral trauma who were sedated and mechanically ventilated. A total of 432 paired observations were performed by independent evaluators simultaneously, prior to eye cleaning, during eye cleaning, during tracheal aspiration and after tracheal aspiration. Sociodemographic, clinical, trauma-related, sedoanalgesia and physiological parameter data (heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were collected. The discriminant validity was tested using the Friedman and Wilcoxon paired tests. The intraclass correlation coefficient and Cohen's Kappa coefficient were used to evaluate the reliability. The Spearman correlation test was used to test the association between clinical variables and BPS-Br scores during tracheal aspiration.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in the physiological parameters during tracheal aspiration, but without correlation with the BPS-Br scores. Pain was significantly more intense during tracheal aspiration (p < 0.005). Satisfactory interobserver agreement was found, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.95 (0.90 - 0.98) and Kappa coefficient of 0.70.

CONCLUSION

Brazilian version of the Behavioral Pain Scale scores increased during tracheal aspiration. The Brazilian version of the scale was valid and reliable for pain assessment of traumatic brain injury victims undergoing tracheal aspiration.

摘要

目的

评估巴西版行为疼痛量表(BPS-Br)在创伤性脑损伤患者中的有效性和可靠性。

方法

在一家大型综合医院的两个重症监护病房(临床和外科)进行配对和重复测量的观察性前瞻性研究。便利样本包括中度或重度穿透性或钝性颅脑外伤的成年患者,这些患者接受了镇静和机械通气。独立评估者在眼部清洁前、眼部清洁期间、气管吸引期间和气管吸引后同时进行了总共432次配对观察。收集了社会人口统计学、临床、创伤相关、镇静镇痛和生理参数数据(心率、收缩压和舒张压)。使用Friedman和Wilcoxon配对检验来测试判别效度。使用组内相关系数和Cohen's Kappa系数来评估可靠性。使用Spearman相关检验来测试气管吸引期间临床变量与BPS-Br评分之间的关联。

结果

气管吸引期间生理参数显著增加,但与BPS-Br评分无关。气管吸引期间疼痛明显更强烈(p < 0.005)。观察者间一致性良好,组内相关系数为0.95(0.90 - 0.98),Kappa系数为0.70。

结论

巴西版行为疼痛量表评分在气管吸引期间增加。该量表的巴西版对于接受气管吸引的创伤性脑损伤患者的疼痛评估是有效且可靠的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7feb/5885230/c5c85bce7c89/rbti-30-01-0042-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7feb/5885230/0196b9523861/rbti-30-01-0042-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7feb/5885230/1e732e8ff204/rbti-30-01-0042-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7feb/5885230/c5c85bce7c89/rbti-30-01-0042-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7feb/5885230/0196b9523861/rbti-30-01-0042-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7feb/5885230/1e732e8ff204/rbti-30-01-0042-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7feb/5885230/c5c85bce7c89/rbti-30-01-0042-g03.jpg

相似文献

1
Pain assessment of traumatic brain injury victims using the Brazilian version of the Behavioral Pain Scale.使用巴西版行为疼痛量表对创伤性脑损伤患者进行疼痛评估。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2018 Mar;30(1):42-49. doi: 10.5935/0103-507x.20180009.
2
Psychometric Analysis of Behavioral Pain Scale Brazilian Version in Sedated and Mechanically Ventilated Adult Patients: A Preliminary Study.行为疼痛量表巴西版在成年镇静和机械通气患者中的心理测量分析:一项初步研究
Pain Pract. 2016 Apr;16(4):451-8. doi: 10.1111/papr.12287. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
3
Psychometric Properties of the Behavioral Pain Scale in Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤中行为疼痛量表的心理测量特性
Pain Manag Nurs. 2019 Apr;20(2):152-157. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
4
[Validation of the Brazilian version of Behavioral Pain Scale in adult sedated and mechanically ventilated patients].[巴西版行为疼痛量表在成年镇静及机械通气患者中的效度验证]
Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2017 May-Jun;67(3):271-277. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2015.11.006. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
5
Translation and cultural adaptation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Behavioral Pain Scale.《行为疼痛量表》巴西葡萄牙语版本的翻译与文化调适
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2014 Oct-Dec;26(4):373-8. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20140057.
6
[Pain assessment of tracheal suctioning on brain injury patients by pain behavioral indicator scale (ESCID)].[应用疼痛行为指标量表(ESCID)对脑损伤患者气管吸痰的疼痛评估]
Enferm Intensiva. 2014 Jul-Sep;25(3):114-21. doi: 10.1016/j.enfi.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 May 10.
7
Pain Measurement in Mechanically Ventilated Patients After Cardiac Surgery: Comparison of the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT).心脏手术后机械通气患者的疼痛测量:行为疼痛量表(BPS)与重症监护疼痛观察工具(CPOT)的比较
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017 Aug;31(4):1227-1234. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.03.013. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
8
Pain measurement in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: Behavioral Pain Scale versus Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool.机械通气危重症患者的疼痛评估:行为疼痛量表与重症监护疼痛观察工具。
J Crit Care. 2015 Feb;30(1):167-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
9
Psychometric validation of the behavioral indicators of pain scale for the assessment of pain in mechanically ventilated and unable to self-report critical care patients.用于评估机械通气且无法自我报告的重症监护患者疼痛的疼痛量表行为指标的心理测量学验证。
Med Intensiva. 2016 Nov;40(8):463-473. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
10
Assessing pain in critically ill sedated patients by using a behavioral pain scale.使用行为疼痛量表评估重症监护室中接受镇静治疗患者的疼痛程度。
Crit Care Med. 2001 Dec;29(12):2258-63. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200112000-00004.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study.重症监护疼痛观察工具-神经在 ICU 脑损伤成人中的验证:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2021 Apr 13;25(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03561-1.
2
Pain management protocol implementation and opioid consumption in critical care: an interrupted time series analysis.重症监护中疼痛管理方案的实施与阿片类药物的使用:一项中断时间序列分析
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2019 Oct-Dec;31(4):447-455. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20190085.

本文引用的文献

1
[Validation of the Brazilian version of Behavioral Pain Scale in adult sedated and mechanically ventilated patients].[巴西版行为疼痛量表在成年镇静及机械通气患者中的效度验证]
Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2017 May-Jun;67(3):271-277. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2015.11.006. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
2
Risk factors for agitation in critically ill patients.危重症患者躁动的危险因素。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2016 Oct-Dec;28(4):413-419. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20160074.
3
Pain management in critically ill patients: a review of multimodal treatment options.
危重症患者的疼痛管理:多模式治疗选择综述
Pain Manag. 2016 Nov;6(6):591-602. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2016-0002. Epub 2016 May 18.
4
Pain assessment in the critically ill adult: Recent evidence and new trends.危重症成人的疼痛评估:最新证据和新趋势。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2016 Jun;34:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
5
Development of a pain management algorithm for intensive care units.重症监护病房疼痛管理算法的开发。
Heart Lung. 2015 Nov-Dec;44(6):521-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2015.09.001.
6
Implementation of a pain management algorithm in intensive care units and evaluation of nurses' level of adherence with the algorithm.重症监护病房疼痛管理算法的实施及护士对该算法依从性水平的评估。
Heart Lung. 2015 Nov-Dec;44(6):528-33. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
7
Ten Myths and Misconceptions Regarding Pain Management in the ICU.重症监护病房疼痛管理的十大误区与误解
Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2468-78. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001256.
8
[Evaluation of pain during mobilization and endotracheal aspiration in critical patients].[危重症患者活动及气管内吸痰时疼痛的评估]
Med Intensiva. 2016 Mar;40(2):96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 May 23.
9
Patients' experience of being in intensive care units.患者在重症监护病房的体验。
J Crit Care. 2015 Aug;30(4):859.e7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.03.021. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
10
Psychometric Analysis of Behavioral Pain Scale Brazilian Version in Sedated and Mechanically Ventilated Adult Patients: A Preliminary Study.行为疼痛量表巴西版在成年镇静和机械通气患者中的心理测量分析:一项初步研究
Pain Pract. 2016 Apr;16(4):451-8. doi: 10.1111/papr.12287. Epub 2015 Apr 10.