• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最初24小时的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)作为急性肝衰竭的预后预测指标

SOFA in the first 24 hours as an outcome predictor of acute liver failure.

作者信息

Rodrigues-Filho Edison Moraes, Fernandes Rogério, Garcez Anderson

机构信息

Unidade de Terapia Intensiva de Transplantes, Hospital Dom Vicente Scherer, Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Grupo de Transplante Hepático, Hospital Dom Vicente Scherer, Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2018 Mar;30(1):64-70. doi: 10.5935/0103-507x.20180012.

DOI:10.5935/0103-507x.20180012
PMID:29742228
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5885233/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe a cohort of patients with acute liver failure and to analyze the demographic and clinical factors associated with mortality.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study in which all patients admitted for acute liver failure from July 28, 2012, to August 31, 2017, were included. Clinical and demographic data were collected using the Epimed System. The SAPS 3, SOFA, and MELD scores were measured. The odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated. Receiver operating characteristics curves were obtained for the prognostic scores, along with the Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the score best predicting mortality.

RESULTS

The majority of the 40 patients were female (77.5%), and the most frequent etiology was hepatitis B (n = 13). Only 35% of the patients underwent liver transplantation. The in-hospital mortality rate was 57.5% (95%CI: 41.5 - 73.5). Among the scores investigated, only SOFA remained associated with risk of death (OR = 1.37; 95%CI 1.11 - 1.69; p < 0.001). After SOFA stratification into < 12 and ≥ 12 points, survival was higher in patients with SOFA <12 (log-rank p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

SOFA score in the first 24 hours was the best predictor of fatal outcome.

摘要

目的

描述一组急性肝衰竭患者,并分析与死亡率相关的人口统计学和临床因素。

方法

进行回顾性队列研究,纳入2012年7月28日至2017年8月31日期间因急性肝衰竭入院的所有患者。使用淫羊藿系统收集临床和人口统计学数据。测量SAPS 3、SOFA和MELD评分。估计比值比和95%置信区间。获得预后评分的受试者工作特征曲线,以及对死亡率预测最佳的评分的Kaplan-Meier生存曲线。

结果

40例患者中大多数为女性(77.5%),最常见的病因是乙型肝炎(n = 13)。只有35%的患者接受了肝移植。住院死亡率为57.5%(95%CI:41.5 - 73.5)。在所研究的评分中,只有SOFA仍然与死亡风险相关(OR = 1.37;95%CI 1.11 - 1.69;p < 0.001)。将SOFA分层为< 12分和≥ 12分后,SOFA <12分的患者生存率更高(对数秩检验p < 0.001)。

结论

最初24小时的SOFA评分是致命结局的最佳预测指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3843/5885233/45cb2b166a88/rbti-30-01-0064-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3843/5885233/7cb7fe5ee39f/rbti-30-01-0064-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3843/5885233/45cb2b166a88/rbti-30-01-0064-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3843/5885233/7cb7fe5ee39f/rbti-30-01-0064-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3843/5885233/45cb2b166a88/rbti-30-01-0064-g02.jpg

相似文献

1
SOFA in the first 24 hours as an outcome predictor of acute liver failure.最初24小时的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)作为急性肝衰竭的预后预测指标
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2018 Mar;30(1):64-70. doi: 10.5935/0103-507x.20180012.
2
Comparison of the sequential organ failure assessment score with the King's College Hospital criteria and the model for end-stage liver disease score for the prognosis of acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure.比较序贯器官衰竭评估评分与英国国王学院医院标准和终末期肝病模型评分对乙酰氨基酚诱导的急性肝衰竭预后的预测价值。
Liver Transpl. 2012 Apr;18(4):405-12. doi: 10.1002/lt.23370.
3
Increased Survival for Patients With Cirrhosis and Organ Failure in Liver Intensive Care and Validation of the Chronic Liver Failure-Sequential Organ Failure Scoring System.肝衰竭患者的生存增加和肝重症监护中的器官衰竭和慢性肝衰竭-序贯器官衰竭评分系统的验证。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jul;13(7):1353-1360.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.08.041. Epub 2014 Sep 21.
4
Comparison of different scoring systems in predicting short-term mortality after liver transplantation.不同评分系统对肝移植术后短期死亡率预测的比较
Transplant Proc. 2015 May;47(4):1207-10. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.11.067.
5
Effectiveness of the sequential organ failure assessment, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II, and simplified acute physiology score II prognostic scoring systems in paraquat-poisoned patients in the intensive care unit.序贯器官衰竭评估、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II及简化急性生理学评分系统II在重症监护病房百草枯中毒患者中的预后评分系统的有效性。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2017 May;36(5):431-437. doi: 10.1177/0960327116657602. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
6
Assessment of scoring systems for acute-on-chronic liver failure at predicting short-term mortality in patients with alcoholic hepatitis.评估急性-on-慢性肝衰竭评分系统对酒精性肝炎患者短期死亡率的预测价值。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov 7;22(41):9205-9213. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i41.9205.
7
Quick chronic liver failure-sequential organ failure assessment: an easy-to-use scoring model for predicting mortality risk in critically ill cirrhosis patients.快速慢性肝衰竭-序贯器官衰竭评估:一种用于预测重症肝硬化患者死亡风险的易用评分模型。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jun;29(6):698-705. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000856.
8
APACHE II score is superior to SOFA, CTP and MELD in predicting the short-term mortality in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF).APACHE II 评分优于 SOFA、CTP 和 MELD,可预测慢加急性肝衰竭(ACLF)患者的短期死亡率。
J Dig Dis. 2013 Sep;14(9):484-90. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12074.
9
Predictors of outcome in decompensated liver disease: validation of the SOFA-L score.
Ir Med J. 2015 Apr;108(4):114-6.
10
Application of chronic liver failure-sequential organ failure assessment score for the predication of mortality after esophageal variceal hemorrhage post endoscopic ligation.慢性肝衰竭序贯器官衰竭评估评分在预测内镜下套扎术后食管静脉曲张出血患者死亡率中的应用
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 2;12(8):e0182529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182529. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Progress on clinical prognosis assessment in liver failure.肝衰竭临床预后评估的研究进展
Liver Res. 2023 Jun 3;7(2):101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.livres.2023.05.004. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Association between thrombomodulin and high mobility group box 1 in sepsis patients.脓毒症患者中血栓调节蛋白与高迁移率族蛋白B1之间的关联
World J Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct 18;9(4):63-73. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v9.i4.63.
3
Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure: The Role of Prognostic Scores in a Single-Center Experience.急性慢性肝衰竭:预后评分在单中心经验中的作用。

本文引用的文献

1
Hepatic Transplants in Espirito Santo State, Brazil.巴西圣埃斯皮里图州的肝移植
Transplant Proc. 2017 May;49(4):841-847. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.01.060.
2
Outcomes in Adults With Acute Liver Failure Between 1998 and 2013: An Observational Cohort Study.1998年至2013年成人急性肝衰竭的预后:一项观察性队列研究
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Jun 7;164(11):724-32. doi: 10.7326/M15-2211. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
3
Acute liver failure.急性肝衰竭
Med Sci Monit. 2020 May 16;26:e922121. doi: 10.12659/MSM.922121.
4
Day-1 PELOD-2 and day-1 "quick" PELOD-2 scores in children with sepsis in the PICU.儿童重症监护病房脓毒症患儿的第 1 天 PELOD-2 和第 1 天“快速”PELOD-2 评分。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2020 Sep-Oct;96(5):660-665. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
N Engl J Med. 2013 Dec 26;369(26):2525-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208937.
4
Useful tests for hepatic encephalopathy in clinical practice.临床实践中对肝性脑病有用的检测方法。
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2014 Jan;16(1):362. doi: 10.1007/s11894-013-0362-0.
5
Advances in the management of acute liver failure.急性肝衰竭的治疗进展。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov 7;19(41):7069-77. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i41.7069.
6
Timing and benefit of liver transplantation in acute liver failure.急性肝衰竭肝移植的时机和获益。
J Hepatol. 2014 Mar;60(3):663-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.10.024. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
7
MELD score: utility and comparison with King's College criteria in non-acetaminophen acute liver failure.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分:在非对乙酰氨基酚所致急性肝衰竭中的效用及与国王学院标准的比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2012 Aug;22(8):492-6.
8
Comparison of the sequential organ failure assessment score with the King's College Hospital criteria and the model for end-stage liver disease score for the prognosis of acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure.比较序贯器官衰竭评估评分与英国国王学院医院标准和终末期肝病模型评分对乙酰氨基酚诱导的急性肝衰竭预后的预测价值。
Liver Transpl. 2012 Apr;18(4):405-12. doi: 10.1002/lt.23370.
9
Liver transplantation for acute liver failure: a 5 years experience.急性肝衰竭的肝移植:5年经验
Arq Gastroenterol. 2008 Jul-Sep;45(3):192-4. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032008000300004.
10
Liver transplantation for acute liver failure: trying to define when transplantation is futile.
Transplant Proc. 2007 Dec;39(10):3178-81. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.06.094.