Faculty of Medicine, Cardiac Electrophysiology Research and Training Center, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Cardiac Electrophysiology Unit, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Basic Res Cardiol. 2018 May 9;113(4):22. doi: 10.1007/s00395-018-0683-0.
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been shown to exert cardioprotection against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. However, whether the cardioprotection of VNS is mainly due to direct activation through its ipsilateral efferent fibers (motor) rather than indirect effects mediated by the afferent fibers (sensory) have not been clearly understood. We hypothesized that VNS exerts cardioprotection predominantly through its efferent vagal fibers. Thirty swine (30-35 kg) were randomized into five groups: I/R no VNS (I/R), and left mid-cervical VNS with both vagal trunks intact (LC-VNS), with left vagus nerve transection (LtVNX), with right vagus nerve transection (RtVNX) and with atropine pretreatment (Atropine), respectively. VNS was applied at the onset of ischemia (60 min) and continued until the end of reperfusion (120 min). Cardiac function, infarct size, arrhythmia score, myocardial connexin43 expression, apoptotic markers, oxidative stress markers, inflammatory markers (TNF-α and IL-10) and cardiac mitochondrial function, dynamics and fatty acid oxidation (MFN2, OPA1, DRP1, PGC1α and CPT1) were determined. LC-VNS exerted cardioprotection against myocardial I/R injury via improvement of mitochondrial function and dynamics and shifted cardiac fatty acid metabolism toward beta oxidation. However, LC-VNS and LtVNX, both efferent vagal fibers are intact, produced more profound cardioprotection, particularly infarct size reduction, decreased arrhythmia score, oxidative stress and apoptosis and attenuated mitochondrial dysfunction compared to RtVNX. These beneficial effects of VNS were abolished by atropine. Our findings suggest that selective efferent VNS may potentially be effective in attenuating myocardial I/R injury. Moreover, VNS required the contralateral efferent vagal activities to fully provide its cardioprotection.
迷走神经刺激 (VNS) 已被证明可对抗心肌缺血/再灌注 (I/R) 损伤发挥心脏保护作用。然而,VNS 的心脏保护作用主要是通过其同侧传出纤维(运动)的直接激活,还是通过传入纤维(感觉)的间接作用介导,尚不清楚。我们假设 VNS 主要通过其传出迷走神经纤维发挥心脏保护作用。将 30 头猪(30-35kg)随机分为五组:I/R 无 VNS(I/R)、左侧颈中部 VNS 双侧迷走神经干完整(LC-VNS)、左侧迷走神经切断术(LtVNX)、右侧迷走神经切断术(RtVNX)和阿托品预处理(Atropine)。VNS 在缺血开始时(60min)施加,并持续到再灌注结束(120min)。测定心功能、梗死面积、心律失常评分、心肌连接蛋白 43 表达、凋亡标志物、氧化应激标志物、炎症标志物(TNF-α和 IL-10)和心脏线粒体功能、动力学和脂肪酸氧化(MFN2、OPA1、DRP1、PGC1α和 CPT1)。LC-VNS 通过改善线粒体功能和动力学,将心脏脂肪酸代谢转向β氧化,对心肌 I/R 损伤发挥心脏保护作用。然而,LC-VNS 和 LtVNX,传出迷走神经纤维均完整,与 RtVNX 相比,产生更显著的心脏保护作用,特别是梗死面积减小、心律失常评分降低、氧化应激和凋亡减少以及线粒体功能障碍减轻。这些 VNS 的有益作用被阿托品消除。我们的研究结果表明,选择性传出 VNS 可能在减轻心肌 I/R 损伤方面有效。此外,VNS 需要对侧传出迷走神经活动来充分提供其心脏保护作用。