• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜手术组与开放手术组结直肠癌患者复发模式的比较:一项荟萃分析。

Comparison of recurrence patterns of colorectal cancer in laparoscopic and open surgery groups of patients: A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Karanikolic Aleksandar, Golubovic Ilija, Radojkovic Milan, Pavlovic Milorad, Sokolovic Dusan, Kovacevic Predrag

机构信息

General Surgery Clinic, Clinical Center Nis, Nis, Serbia.

出版信息

J BUON. 2018 Mar-Apr;23(2):302-311.

PMID:29745069
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate differences between laparoscopic and open surgery and also the development of local and distant colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrences in treated patients.

METHODS

2,058 cases treated with laparoscopic surgery and 2,365 cases with open surgery from 20 included studies were analyzed, using the random-effects model. The mean difference and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated. An overall and a subgroup analysis was performed according to the type of cancer - colon or rectal, and we registered the operating time, number of dissected lymph nodes and need for intraoperative blood transfusion in the laparoscopic and open surgery group of patients.

RESULTS

The operating time in the laparoscopic surgery group was significantly longer than in the open surgery group (mean difference 38.23 min). There was no significant differences in the number of dissected lymph nodes between the two groups when we pooled data for treatment of CRC (p=0.16). The OR of overall and local recurrences was significantly decreased in patients in the laparoscopic surgery group compared to those in the open surgery group (OR 0.83; 95%CI 0.70-0.98; p=0.03) and (OR 0.70; 95%CI 0.50-0.97; p=0.03), respectively. No significant differences were found between patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery and those that had open surgery for distant recurrences after CRC treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

There was statistically significant difference between laparoscopic or open surgery and development of local and overall CRC recurrences.

摘要

目的

本荟萃分析旨在评估腹腔镜手术与开放手术之间的差异,以及接受治疗患者中局部和远处结直肠癌(CRC)复发的情况。

方法

使用随机效应模型,对20项纳入研究中的2058例接受腹腔镜手术的病例和2365例接受开放手术的病例进行分析。计算平均差和比值比(OR)以及95%置信区间(95%CI)。根据癌症类型(结肠癌或直肠癌)进行总体和亚组分析,并记录腹腔镜手术组和开放手术组患者的手术时间、清扫淋巴结数量以及术中输血需求。

结果

腹腔镜手术组的手术时间明显长于开放手术组(平均差38.23分钟)。当汇总CRC治疗数据时,两组之间清扫淋巴结数量无显著差异(p = 0.16)。与开放手术组患者相比,腹腔镜手术组患者总体复发和局部复发的OR均显著降低(分别为OR 0.83;95%CI 0.70 - 0.98;p = 0.03)和(OR 0.70;95%CI 0.50 - 0.97;p = 0.03)。CRC治疗后远处复发方面,接受腹腔镜手术的患者与接受开放手术的患者之间未发现显著差异。

结论

腹腔镜手术或开放手术与局部和总体CRC复发的发生之间存在统计学显著差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of recurrence patterns of colorectal cancer in laparoscopic and open surgery groups of patients: A meta-analysis.腹腔镜手术组与开放手术组结直肠癌患者复发模式的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J BUON. 2018 Mar-Apr;23(2):302-311.
2
Laparoscopic Versus Open Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancer: A Subgroup Analysis of a Large Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan.腹腔镜与开放手术行局部进展期低位直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术:日本一项大型多中心队列研究的亚组分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Sep;60(9):954-964. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000843.
3
Long-term results of a randomized study comparing open surgery and laparoscopic surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients (Eld Lap study).老年结直肠癌患者行开放手术与腹腔镜手术的随机对照研究的长期结果(Eld Lap 研究)。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Oct;35(10):5686-5697. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08026-0. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
4
Midterm follow-up of a randomized trial of open surgery versus laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.老年结直肠癌患者开腹手术与腹腔镜手术随机对照试验的中期随访。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):3890-3897. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5418-z. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
5
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌(COLOR II):一项随机、3 期临床试验的短期结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(3):210-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
6
[Comparative study of 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal tumors].[三维与二维腹腔镜手术治疗胃肠道肿瘤的对比研究]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 May 25;20(5):509-513.
7
There is no difference in outcome between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌的疗效无差异:短期和长期肿瘤学结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Aug;21(8):595-604. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1662-4. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
8
[Laparoscopic-assisted resection for colorectal cancer without incision at abdomen versus traditional laparoscopic resection: A Meta-analysis].[腹腔镜辅助下无腹部切口的结直肠癌切除术与传统腹腔镜切除术:一项Meta分析]
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Jan 28;42(1):88-97. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2017.01.015.
9
The Oncologic Outcomes of Inferior Mesenteric Artery-Preserving Laparoscopic Lymph Node Dissection for Upper-Rectal or Sigmoid Colon Cancer.保留肠系膜下动脉的腹腔镜直肠癌或乙状结肠癌淋巴结清扫术的肿瘤学结局
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Nov;28(11):1352-1358. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0201. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
10
Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients.124例未经挑选的患者接受腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌切除术的长期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Oct;17(10):1530-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8874-y. Epub 2003 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation and analysis of neurocognitive dysfunction in patients with colorectal cancer after radical resection: A retrospective study.结直肠癌根治术后患者神经认知功能障碍的评估与分析:一项回顾性研究。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Sep 27;16(9):2893-2901. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.2893.
2
Minimally invasive treatments for early colorectal cancer: comparison of endoscopic resection and laparoscopic surgery.早期结直肠癌的微创治疗:内镜下切除术与腹腔镜手术的比较
Korean J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jun;18(1):47-55. doi: 10.14216/kjco.22006. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
3
Recurrence Risk after Radical Colorectal Cancer Surgery-Less Than before, But How High Is It?
结直肠癌根治术后的复发风险——低于以往,但有多高呢?
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Nov 9;12(11):3308. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113308.