Suppr超能文献

疼痛量与伤口愈合:间断倒刺聚对二氧环己酮缝线和标准尼龙缝线在腹部皮肤缝合中的比较

Pain quantum and wound healing: a comparison of interrupted inversion PDS and standard nylon sutures in abdominal skin closure.

作者信息

Cassie A B, Chatterjee A K, Mehta S, Haworth J M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Burnley General Hospital, Lancashire.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1988 Nov;70(6):339-42.

Abstract

Patients' postoperative pain experience during 5 days after hernia repairs or upper abdominal procedures was compared when skin closure was achieved by either full thickness interrupted sutures or subcuticular interrupted inversion sutures. Quantitative pain assessments were made using linear analogue charts and standardised analgesic requirements. Clinical advantage for the subcuticular technique was confirmed for the hernia group and possible advantage in the upper abdominal closure, suggested by lesser analgesic requirement. Statistical analysis has lent support to the hernia group findings but is less clear in the upper abdominal group. A comparison of wound healing, sepsis and cosmetic outcome showed no apparent advantage to either method. Economies and patient preference favoured the subcuticular method.

摘要

当通过全层间断缝合或皮下间断内翻缝合实现皮肤闭合时,比较了疝气修补术或上腹部手术后5天内患者的术后疼痛体验。使用线性模拟量表和标准化镇痛需求进行定量疼痛评估。皮下技术在疝气组的临床优势得到证实,在上腹部闭合方面可能具有优势,表现为镇痛需求较少。统计分析支持了疝气组的研究结果,但在上腹部组中不太明确。伤口愈合、败血症和美容效果的比较显示两种方法均无明显优势。经济性和患者偏好有利于皮下方法。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验