Cassie A B, Chatterjee A K, Mehta S, Haworth J M
Department of Surgery, Burnley General Hospital, Lancashire.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1988 Nov;70(6):339-42.
Patients' postoperative pain experience during 5 days after hernia repairs or upper abdominal procedures was compared when skin closure was achieved by either full thickness interrupted sutures or subcuticular interrupted inversion sutures. Quantitative pain assessments were made using linear analogue charts and standardised analgesic requirements. Clinical advantage for the subcuticular technique was confirmed for the hernia group and possible advantage in the upper abdominal closure, suggested by lesser analgesic requirement. Statistical analysis has lent support to the hernia group findings but is less clear in the upper abdominal group. A comparison of wound healing, sepsis and cosmetic outcome showed no apparent advantage to either method. Economies and patient preference favoured the subcuticular method.
当通过全层间断缝合或皮下间断内翻缝合实现皮肤闭合时,比较了疝气修补术或上腹部手术后5天内患者的术后疼痛体验。使用线性模拟量表和标准化镇痛需求进行定量疼痛评估。皮下技术在疝气组的临床优势得到证实,在上腹部闭合方面可能具有优势,表现为镇痛需求较少。统计分析支持了疝气组的研究结果,但在上腹部组中不太明确。伤口愈合、败血症和美容效果的比较显示两种方法均无明显优势。经济性和患者偏好有利于皮下方法。