Campolina Alessandro G, López Rossana V M, Nardi Elene P, Ferraz Marcos B
Center for Translational Research in Oncology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo-Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.
Center for Translational Research in Oncology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo-Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.
Value Health Reg Issues. 2018 Dec;17:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 May 8.
To investigate the internal consistency of the SF-6D as a health status index in the Brazilian urban population.
Cross-sectional population based study.
Five thousand individuals, older than the age of 15, were assessed in the five regions of the country. Two different methods of scoring the SF-6D where compared: "weighting the items" of the questionnaire through the Brazilian official weight coefficients, and "unweighting the items" through a parallel non preference scoring rule solely based on patients' answers to SF-6D health classification system (SF-6D). Principal component factor analysis was used for the development of the SF-6D Pearson's, Spearman's, and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess the psychometric properties.
The SF-6D scoring formula summarized the pattern of factor loadings and the item-internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.858). The scale showed good item-internal consistency, exceeding the 0.70 standard. The association between weighted and unweighted (SF-6D) scores was extremely high (Spearman's ρ = 0.971). The correlations of the SF-6D with the Physical Component of the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) and the Health Assessment Questionnaire was moderate to strong. The intraclass correlation coefficient obtained (0.917) also suggested that the concordance between the weighted and unweighted score distributions was prominent.
A nonweighted approach to score the SF-6D provides a reliable global measure of health status. The SF-6D health classification system is useful for assessing quality of life in a large and representative sample of the Brazilian population.
调查SF - 6D作为巴西城市人口健康状况指标的内部一致性。
基于人群的横断面研究。
在该国五个地区对5000名15岁以上的个体进行评估。比较了两种不同的SF - 6D评分方法:通过巴西官方权重系数对问卷“项目加权”,以及仅基于患者对SF - 6D健康分类系统(SF - 6D)的回答,通过并行的非偏好评分规则“项目未加权”。主成分因子分析用于开发SF - 6D。使用Pearson、Spearman和组内相关系数评估心理测量特性。
SF - 6D评分公式总结了因子载荷模式和项目内部一致性(Cronbach'sα = 0.858)。该量表显示出良好的项目内部一致性,超过了0.70的标准。加权和未加权(SF - 6D)分数之间的关联极高(Spearman'sρ = 0.971)。SF - 6D与12项简短健康调查(SF - 12)的身体成分以及健康评估问卷的相关性为中度至高度。获得的组内相关系数(0.917)也表明加权和未加权分数分布之间的一致性很突出。
对SF - 6D进行非加权评分的方法提供了一种可靠的总体健康状况测量方法。SF - 6D健康分类系统对于评估巴西人口中一个大型且具有代表性的样本的生活质量很有用。