Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS
University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS.
Med J Aust. 2018 May 21;208(9):398-403. doi: 10.5694/mja17.00857. Epub 2018 May 14.
To assess the impact of a multi-strategic, interdisciplinary intervention on antipsychotic and benzodiazepine prescribing in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Design, setting: Prospective, longitudinal intervention in Australian RACFs, April 2014 - March 2016.
150 RACFs (with 12 157 residents) comprised the main participant group; two further groups were consultant pharmacists (staff education) and community pharmacies (prescribing data). Data for all RACF residents, excluding residents receiving respite or end-stage palliative care, were included.
A multi-strategic program comprising psychotropic medication audit and feedback, staff education, and interdisciplinary case review at baseline and 3 months; final audit at 6 months.
Mean prevalence of regular antipsychotic and benzodiazepine prescribing at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months. Secondary measures: chlorpromazine and diazepam equivalent doses/day/resident; proportions of residents for whom drug was ceased or the dose reduced; prevalence of antidepressant and prn (as required) psychotropic prescribing (to detect any substitution practice).
During the 6-month intervention, the proportion of residents prescribed antipsychotics declined by 13% (from 21.6% [95% CI, 20.4-22.9%] to 18.9% [95% CI, 17.7-20.1%]), and that of residents regularly prescribed benzodiazepines by 21% (from 22.2% [95% CI, 21.0-23.5%] to 17.6% [95% CI, 16.5-18.7]; each, P < 0.001). Mean chlorpromazine equivalent dose declined from 22.9 mg/resident/day (95% CI, 19.8-26.0) to 20.2 mg/resident/day (95% CI, 17.5-22.9; P < 0.001); mean diazepam equivalent dose declined from 1.4 mg/resident/day (95% CI, 1.3-1.5) to 1.1 mg/resident/day (95% CI, 0.9-1.2; P < 0.001). For 39% of residents prescribed antipsychotics and benzodiazepines at baseline, these agents had been ceased or their doses reduced by 6 months. There was no substitution by sedating antidepressants or prn prescribing of other psychotropic agents.
The RedUSe program achieved significant reductions in the proportions of RACF residents prescribed antipsychotics and benzodiazepines.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials, ACTRN12617001257358.
评估多策略、跨学科干预对养老院中抗精神病药和苯二氮䓬类药物处方的影响。
设计、地点:2014 年 4 月至 2016 年 3 月,澳大利亚养老院的前瞻性、纵向干预。
150 家养老院(共 12157 名居民)是主要参与者群体;另外两个组是顾问药剂师(员工教育)和社区药房(处方数据)。包括所有养老院居民的数据,但不包括接受临时护理或临终姑息治疗的居民。
多策略方案包括精神药物审核和反馈、员工教育以及基线和 3 个月时的跨学科病例审查;最终审核在 6 个月时进行。
基线时、3 个月和 6 个月时常规抗精神病药和苯二氮䓬类药物处方的平均流行率。次要指标:氯丙嗪和地西泮等效剂量/天/居民;停止用药或减少剂量的居民比例;抗抑郁药和按需(prn)精神药物处方的流行率(以检测任何替代治疗的情况)。
在 6 个月的干预期间,服用抗精神病药物的居民比例下降了 13%(从 21.6%(95%CI,20.4-22.9%)降至 18.9%(95%CI,17.7-20.1%)),定期服用苯二氮䓬类药物的居民比例下降了 21%(从 22.2%(95%CI,21.0-23.5%)降至 17.6%(95%CI,16.5-18.7%);每个,P < 0.001)。氯丙嗪等效剂量均值从 22.9 毫克/居民/天(95%CI,19.8-26.0)降至 20.2 毫克/居民/天(95%CI,17.5-22.9;P < 0.001);地西泮等效剂量均值从 1.4 毫克/居民/天(95%CI,1.3-1.5)降至 1.1 毫克/居民/天(95%CI,0.9-1.2;P < 0.001)。基线时服用抗精神病药和苯二氮䓬类药物的 39%居民,这些药物在 6 个月时已被停止或减少剂量。没有用镇静性抗抑郁药替代,也没有其他精神药物的按需处方。
RedUSe 方案显著降低了养老院居民服用抗精神病药和苯二氮䓬类药物的比例。
澳大利亚新西兰临床试验,ACTRN12617001257358。