Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland.
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Dec;15(12):1723-1731. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 May 7.
The radiology report serves as the primary means of communication between radiologist and clinician. However, the value clinicians place on imaging and reports is variable, with many images of studies or their reports never being viewed. This has implications on the perceived value of the radiologist in the imaging chain. We hypothesized that neurologists, neurosurgeons, and otolaryngologists would view neuroradiology images most frequently and neuroradiology reports least frequently of all medical specialties.
Ordering data were collected on all neuroradiology studies over a 1-month period. Imaging study date and time stamps were obtained for (1) when imaging study orders were placed, (2) when the patient underwent the imaging study, (3) when the imaging studies were viewed, and (4) when the radiology reports were accessed and by whom. Each data point included provider names, locations, departments, and level of training.
There were 7,438 imaging neuroradiology studies ordered. Overall, 85.7% (6,372) of reports and 53.2% (3,956) of imaging studies were viewed and 13.1% (977) of studies had neither images nor reports viewed. Inpatient neurosurgeons and neurologists viewed both imaging and reports significantly more than primary care specialties (P < .001). In the outpatient setting, this trend stayed true for neurosurgeons though was not true for neurologists (P < .001). Outpatient study imaging and reports were both viewed the least (48.6%), and inpatient study reports were viewed the most (95.2%; P < .001).
Viewing of imaging and reports varies with neurosurgeons viewing neuroradiology studies more than all other medical specialties. Overall, the reports were viewed significantly more than the images, suggesting that the radiologist and his or her interpretation are more valuable than the study's images. The radiologists' value, as measured by reports viewed, was maximal with obstetricians and gynecologists and psychiatry clinicians.
放射科报告是放射科医生与临床医生之间主要的沟通方式。然而,临床医生对影像学检查和报告的重视程度各不相同,许多影像学检查的图像或报告从未被查看过。这对影像学检查链中放射科医生的感知价值产生了影响。我们假设神经科医生、神经外科医生和耳鼻喉科医生会最频繁地查看神经影像学图像,而最不频繁地查看神经影像学报告。
在一个月的时间里,收集了所有神经放射学研究的医嘱数据。获取了影像学研究的日期和时间戳,包括:(1) 影像学研究医嘱下达的时间,(2) 患者进行影像学研究的时间,(3) 影像学研究被查看的时间,以及 (4) 放射科报告被访问的时间以及由谁访问。每个数据点都包含提供者的姓名、地点、科室和培训水平。
共下达了 7438 项神经影像学研究的医嘱。总体而言,6372 份报告(85.7%)和 3956 份影像学研究(53.2%)被查看,13.1%(977 份)的研究既没有查看图像也没有查看报告。住院神经外科医生和神经科医生查看影像学和报告的次数明显多于初级保健专业医生(P<.001)。在门诊环境中,神经外科医生也保持了这种趋势,而神经内科医生则不然(P<.001)。门诊研究的影像学和报告均被查看的比例最低(48.6%),而住院研究报告被查看的比例最高(95.2%;P<.001)。
影像学检查和报告的查看情况因神经外科医生比其他所有医学专业医生更频繁地查看神经影像学研究而有所不同。总体而言,报告的查看率明显高于图像,这表明放射科医生及其解释比研究的图像更有价值。通过查看报告来衡量,放射科医生的价值在妇产科医生和精神科医生中达到了最大值。