Suppr超能文献

传统纯文本与多媒体增强型放射学报告:转诊医生对价值的看法。

Traditional text-only versus multimedia-enhanced radiology reporting: referring physicians' perceptions of value.

作者信息

Sadigh Gelareh, Hertweck Timothy, Kao Cristine, Wood Paul, Hughes Danny, Henry Travis S, Duszak Richard

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

IDR Medical GmbH, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 May;12(5):519-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.11.009. Epub 2015 Jan 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate referring physicians' perceptions of multimedia-enhanced radiology reporting (MERR) as an alternative to traditional text-only radiology reporting. MERR supplements text-only reports by embedding user-friendly interactive hyperlinks to key images and graphically plotting target lesion size longitudinally over time.

METHODS

Of 402 physicians responding to a web-based survey, 200 (50 each medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, neurosurgeons, and pulmonologists) practicing in the United States fulfilled criteria to complete an online survey with questions focusing on satisfaction with current text-only reports and the perceived value of image- and data-enriched reporting.

RESULTS

The mean respondent age was 46 years, with a mean of 15 years in posttraining clinical practice (85% men; 47% from academic medical centers). Although 80% were satisfied with the format of their current text-only radiology reports, 80% believed that MERR would represent an improvement. The most commonly reported advantages of MERR were "improved understanding of radiology findings by correlating images to text reports" (86%) and "easier access to images while monitoring progression of a disease/condition" (79%). Of the 28% of physicians with concerns about MERR implementation, the most common were that it was "too time intensive" (53%) and "the clinic workflow does not allow itself to view reports in such a fashion" (42%). Physicians indicated a strong increased likelihood of preferentially referring patients to (80%) and recommending peers to (79%) facilities that offer MERR.

CONCLUSION

Most specialist referring physicians believe that interactive image- and data-embedded MERR represents an improvement over current text-only radiology reporting. Compared with current report formatting, most would preferentially refer patients and peers to facilities offering more meaningful image- and graphically enriched reporting platforms.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估转诊医生对多媒体增强放射学报告(MERR)作为传统纯文本放射学报告替代方案的看法。MERR通过嵌入指向关键图像的用户友好型交互式超链接以及随时间纵向以图形方式绘制目标病变大小来补充纯文本报告。

方法

在402名回复基于网络调查的医生中,200名(肿瘤内科医生、放射肿瘤学家、神经外科医生和肺科医生各50名)在美国执业,符合完成在线调查的标准,调查问题聚焦于对当前纯文本报告的满意度以及对图像和数据丰富报告的感知价值。

结果

受访者的平均年龄为46岁,平均有15年的毕业后临床实践经验(85%为男性;47%来自学术医疗中心)。尽管80%的人对当前纯文本放射学报告的格式感到满意,但80%的人认为MERR会有所改进。MERR最常被报告的优点是“通过将图像与文本报告相关联,提高对放射学结果的理解”(86%)和“在监测疾病进展时更容易获取图像”(79%)。在对MERR实施表示担忧的28%的医生中,最常见的担忧是“时间投入太大”(53%)和“临床工作流程不允许以这种方式查看报告”(42%)。医生表示,他们更有可能优先将患者转诊至(80%)并向同行推荐(79%)提供MERR的机构。

结论

大多数专科转诊医生认为,嵌入交互式图像和数据的MERR比当前的纯文本放射学报告有所改进。与当前的报告格式相比,大多数人会优先将患者和同行转诊至提供更有意义的图像和图形丰富报告平台的机构。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验