Patel Bhavik N, Lopez Jose M, Jiang Brian G, Roth Christopher J, Nelson Rendon C
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Jan;14(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
To determine the value of image-rich radiology reports (IRRR) by evaluating the interest and preferences of referring physicians, potential impact on clinical workflow, and the willingness of radiologists to create them.
Referring physicians and radiologists were interviewed in this prospective, HIPAA-compliant study. Subject willingness to participate in the study was determined by an e-mail. A single investigator conducted all interviews using a standard questionnaire. All subjects reviewed a video mockup demonstration of IRRR and three methods for viewing embedded images, as follows: (1) clickable hyperlinks to access a scrollable stack of images, (2) scrollable and enlargeable small-image thumbnails, and (3) scrollable but not enlargeable medium-sized images. Questionnaire responses, free comments, and general impressions were captured and analyzed.
Seventy-two physicians (36 clinicians, 36 radiologists) were interviewed. Thirty-one clinicians (86%) expressed interest in using IRRR. Seventy-seven percent of subjects believed IRRR would improve communication. Ten clinicians (28%) preferred method 1, 18 (50%) preferred method 2, and 8 (22%) preferred method 3 for embedding images. Thirty clinicians (83%) stated that IRRR would improve efficiency. Twenty-two radiologists (61%) preferred selecting a tool button with a mouse and right-clicking images to embed them, 13 (36%) preferred pressing a function key, and 11 (31%) preferred dictating series and image numbers. The average time radiologists were willing to expend for embedding images was 66.7 seconds.
Referring physicians and radiologist both believe IRRR would add value by improving communication with the potential to improve the workflow efficiency of referring physicians.
通过评估转诊医生的兴趣和偏好、对临床工作流程的潜在影响以及放射科医生创建图像丰富的放射学报告(IRRR)的意愿,来确定其价值。
在这项符合HIPAA规定的前瞻性研究中,对转诊医生和放射科医生进行了访谈。通过电子邮件确定受试者参与研究的意愿。由一名调查员使用标准问卷进行所有访谈。所有受试者观看了IRRR的视频模型演示以及三种查看嵌入式图像的方法,如下:(1)可点击的超链接以访问可滚动的图像堆栈,(2)可滚动且可放大的小图像缩略图,以及(3)可滚动但不可放大的中等大小图像。收集并分析问卷回复、自由评论和总体印象。
共访谈了72名医生(36名临床医生,36名放射科医生)。31名临床医生(86%)表示有兴趣使用IRRR。77%的受试者认为IRRR会改善沟通。10名临床医生(28%)更喜欢方法1,18名(50%)更喜欢方法2,8名(22%)更喜欢方法3来嵌入图像。30名临床医生(83%)表示IRRR会提高效率。22名放射科医生(61%)更喜欢用鼠标选择工具按钮并右键点击图像来嵌入它们,13名(36%)更喜欢按下功能键,11名(31%)更喜欢口述系列和图像编号。放射科医生愿意花费在嵌入图像上的平均时间为66.7秒。
转诊医生和放射科医生都认为IRRR通过改善沟通有增加价值的潜力,有可能提高转诊医生的工作流程效率。