Institute for Sanitary Engineering, Water Quality and Solid Waste Management, University of Stuttgart, Bandtäle 2, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Chair of Resource Efficient Wastewater Technology, University of Kaiserslautern, Paul-Ehrlich-Str. 14, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Feb 15;615:1176-1191. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.223. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
The worldwide increasing consumption of the phosphonates 2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid [PBTC], 1-hydroxyethane 1,1-diphosphonic acid [HEDP], nitrilotris(methylene phosphonic acid) [NTMP], ethylenediamine tetra(methylene phosphonic acid) [EDTMP] and diethylenetriamine penta(methylene phosphonic acid) [DTPMP] over the past decades put phosphonates into focus of environmental scientists and agencies, as they are increasingly discussed in the context of various environmental problems. The hitherto difficult analysis of phosphonates contributed to the fact that very little is known about their concentrations and behavior in the environment. This work critically reviews the existing literature up to the year 2016 on the potential environmental relevance of phosphonates, their biotic and abiotic degradability, and their removal in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Accordingly, despite their stability against biological degradation, phosphonates can be removed with relatively high efficiency (>80%) in WWTPs operated with chemical phosphate precipitation. In the literature, however, to our knowledge, there is no information as to whether an enhanced biological phosphorus removal alone is sufficient for such high removal rates and whether the achievable phosphonate concentrations in effluents are sufficiently low to prevent eutrophication. It is currently expected that phosphonates, although being complexing agents, do not remobilize heavy metals from sediments in a significant amount since the phosphonate concentrations required for this (>50μg/L) are considerably higher than the concentrations determined in surface waters. Various publications also point out that phosphonates are harmless to a variety of aquatic organisms. Moreover, degradation products thereof such as N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine and aminomethylphosphonic acid are regarded as being particularly critical. Despite their high stability against biological degradation, phosphonates contribute to eutrophication due to abiotic degradation (mainly photolysis). Furthermore, the literature reports on the fact that phosphonates in high concentrations interfere with phosphate precipitation in WWTPs. Thus, it is recommended to remove phosphonates, in particular from industrial wastewaters, before discharging them into water bodies or WWTPs.
过去几十年中,由于全球范围内对膦酸盐(2-膦丁烷-1,2,4-三羧酸[PBTC]、1-羟基亚乙基-1,1-二膦酸[HEDP]、次氮基三(亚甲基)膦酸[NTMP]、乙二胺四(亚甲基)膦酸[EDTMP]和二乙烯三胺五(亚甲基)膦酸[DTPMP])的消费不断增加,这些物质已成为环境科学家和机构关注的焦点,因为它们在各种环境问题中被越来越多地讨论。迄今为止,膦酸盐的分析非常困难,这导致人们对其在环境中的浓度和行为知之甚少。本研究批判性地回顾了截至 2016 年有关膦酸盐潜在环境相关性、生物和非生物可降解性以及在废水处理厂(WWTP)中去除的现有文献。因此,尽管膦酸盐具有抗生物降解性,但在采用化学除磷运行的 WWTP 中,它们可以以相对较高的效率(>80%)去除。然而,据我们所知,文献中没有关于单独增强生物除磷是否足以实现如此高的去除率以及废水中可达到的膦酸盐浓度是否足够低以防止富营养化的信息。目前预计,尽管膦酸盐是络合剂,但它们不会从沉积物中大量重新释放重金属,因为这需要的膦酸盐浓度(>50μg/L)远高于地表水确定的浓度。各种出版物还指出,膦酸盐对各种水生生物无害。此外,其降解产物如 N-(膦甲基)甘氨酸和氨基甲基膦酸被认为是特别关键的。尽管膦酸盐具有抗生物降解性,但由于非生物降解(主要是光解),它们会导致富营养化。此外,文献还报道了高浓度的膦酸盐会干扰 WWTP 中的磷酸盐沉淀的事实。因此,建议在将膦酸盐排放到水体或 WWTP 之前,特别是从工业废水中去除它们。