School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Nutrients. 2018 May 3;10(5):561. doi: 10.3390/nu10050561.
Publications from clinical trials of vitamin D supplementation have increased substantially over the last 15 years. Yet, despite the growing number of randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses of these studies have drawn inconsistent conclusions. Many meta-analyses assume that vitamin D is a pharmacological agent, and give scant consideration of it being a nutrient. This limits their potential to detect beneficial effects in participants with vitamin D deficiency. An increasing body of evidence from both observational studies and clinical trials supports the presence of thresholds in vitamin D status below which disease risk increases and vitamin supplementation has beneficial effects. Future supplementation trials which seek to replicate these findings should recruit sufficient numbers of participants with low vitamin D levels, and not give low-dose vitamin D to the placebo group. If the presence of vitamin D thresholds for beneficial effects is confirmed, this would strengthen the need for vitamin D fortification of foods.
过去 15 年来,维生素 D 补充剂的临床试验出版物大幅增加。然而,尽管随机对照试验的数量不断增加,但对这些研究的荟萃分析得出的结论却不一致。许多荟萃分析假设维生素 D 是一种药物,而很少考虑它是一种营养素。这限制了它们在维生素 D 缺乏的参与者中检测到有益效果的潜力。越来越多的来自观察性研究和临床试验的证据支持维生素 D 状态存在一个阈值,低于该阈值,疾病风险会增加,而维生素补充剂会产生有益的效果。未来的补充试验如果试图复制这些发现,应该招募足够数量的维生素 D 水平较低的参与者,并且不给安慰剂组服用低剂量的维生素 D。如果确认有益效果存在维生素 D 阈值,这将加强食物强化维生素 D 的必要性。