Tuncali Bahattin, Boya Hakan, Kayhan Zeynep, Arac Sukru
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Baskent University Zubeyde Hanim Practice and Research Center, Izmir, Turkey.
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Baskent University Zubeyde Hanim Practice and Research Center, Izmir, Turkey.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018 Jul;52(4):256-260. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 May 8.
The aim of this study was to compare the limb occlusion pressure (LOP) determination and arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) estimation methods for tourniquet pressure setting in adult patients undergoing knee arthroplasty under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.
Ninety-three patients were randomized into two groups. Pneumatic tourniquet inflation pressures were adjusted based either on LOP determination or AOP estimation in Group 1 (46 patients, 38 female and 8 male; mean age: 67.71 ± 9.17) and Group 2 (47 patients, 40 female and 7 male; mean age: 70.31 ± 8.27), respectively. Initial and maximal systolic blood pressures, LOP/AOP levels, required time to estimate AOP/determinate LOP and set the cuff pressure, initial and maximal tourniquet pressures and tourniquet time were recorded. The effectiveness of the tourniquet was assessed by the orthopedic surgeons using a Likert scale.
Initial and maximal systolic blood pressures, determined LOP, estimated AOP, duration of tourniquet and the performance of the tourniquet were not different between groups. However, the initial (182.44 ± 14.59 mm Hg vs. 200.69 ± 15.55 mm Hg) and maximal tourniquet pressures (186.91 ± 12.91 mm Hg vs. 200.69 ± 15.55 mm Hg) were significantly lower, the time required to estimate AOP and set the tourniquet cuff pressure was significantly less (23.91 ± 4.77 s vs. 178.81 ± 25.46 s) in Group II (p = 0.000). No complications that could be related to the tourniquet were observed during or after surgery.
Tourniquet inflation pressure setting based on AOP estimation method provides a bloodless surgical field that is comparable to that of LOP determination method with lower pneumatic inflation pressure and less required time for cuff pressure adjustment in adult patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty under combined spinal epidural anesthesia.
本研究旨在比较在腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉下行膝关节置换术的成年患者中,肢体阻断压(LOP)测定法和动脉阻断压(AOP)估计法在止血带压力设定中的应用。
93例患者随机分为两组。第1组(46例患者,38例女性,8例男性;平均年龄:67.71±9.17岁)和第2组(47例患者,40例女性,7例男性;平均年龄:70.31±8.27岁)分别根据LOP测定法和AOP估计法调整气压止血带充气压力。记录初始和最大收缩压、LOP/AOP水平、估计AOP/测定LOP并设定袖带压力所需时间、初始和最大止血带压力以及止血带使用时间。骨科医生使用李克特量表评估止血带的有效性。
两组患者的初始和最大收缩压、测定的LOP、估计的AOP、止血带使用时间以及止血带的性能无差异。然而,第2组的初始(182.44±14.59 mmHg对200.69±15.55 mmHg)和最大止血带压力(186.91±12.91 mmHg对200.69±15.55 mmHg)显著较低,估计AOP并设定止血带袖带压力所需时间显著较短(23.91±4.77秒对178.81±25.46秒)(p = 0.000)。手术期间及术后未观察到与止血带相关的并发症。
在腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉下行全膝关节置换术的成年患者中,基于AOP估计法设定止血带充气压力可提供与LOP测定法相当的无血手术视野,且充气压力更低,调整袖带压力所需时间更短。