Suppr超能文献

上肢手术中止血带压力的系统评价与Meta分析

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Tourniquet Pressures in Upper Limb Surgery.

作者信息

Chan Kayen, Jaibaji Rawan, Barker Eleanor, Talwar Cyrus, Pang Calver

机构信息

Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge CB2 0QC, UK.

School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge Medical Library, Cambridge CB2 0SP, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 13;14(6):1938. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061938.

Abstract

Tourniquet pressures used in upper limb surgery are commonly standardized at 250 mmHg. These higher tourniquet pressures have been associated with an increased risk of complications, such as neural compression injury and soft tissue damage. However, there has been limited consensus as to the use of lower tourniquet pressures and their efficacy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to examine the current evidence for the use of lower tourniquet pressures in upper limb surgery, comparing them to the standard tourniquet pressures of 250 mmHg and, in some cases, 300 mmHg. This study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024511501). The primary outcome was the adequacy and quality of the bloodless field achieved at lower pressures. Secondary outcomes were assessed when reported, including the operative time, pain, and complications. The databases Medline (via Ovid), Embase (via Ovid), Cochrane, Web of Science (Core Collection) and Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register, and ISRCTN registry were searched from inception to January 2025. The inclusion criteria included patients undergoing upper limb surgery using regional or general anesthetic with the use of a pneumatic tourniquet. A total of 1994 studies were identified, of which 12 met the inclusion criteria for review and 8 studies were used in the meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I and RoB-2 tools. The sample size was 1427 patients with a mean age of 46.8 years. All studies showed a bloodless surgical field at lower tourniquet occlusion pressures. The meta-analysis showed the overall mean tourniquet inflation pressure, estimated using a random effects model, to be 169.3 mmHg with a 95% confidence interval of 144.9-193.6. However, the heterogeneity in the reported results is significant ( < 0.0001) and is a limitation to this review. This systematic review highlights the benefit of the use of a lower tourniquet pressure (below the standard 250 mmHg) to produce an adequate surgical field and influence procedural outcomes.

摘要

上肢手术中使用的止血带压力通常标准化为250mmHg。这些较高的止血带压力与并发症风险增加有关,如神经压迫损伤和软组织损伤。然而,对于使用较低止血带压力及其效果,目前尚未达成共识。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在研究上肢手术中使用较低止血带压力的现有证据,将其与250mmHg(某些情况下为300mmHg)的标准止血带压力进行比较。本研究已在PROSPERO(CRD42024511501)注册。主要结局是在较低压力下实现的无血视野的充分性和质量。报告时评估次要结局,包括手术时间、疼痛和并发症。从数据库建立至2025年1月,检索了Medline(通过Ovid)、Embase(通过Ovid)、Cochrane、科学引文索引(核心合集)和Scopus、ClinicalTrials.gov、欧盟临床试验注册库以及ISRCTN注册库。纳入标准包括使用区域或全身麻醉并使用气动止血带进行上肢手术的患者。共识别出1994项研究,其中12项符合纳入标准进行综述,8项研究用于荟萃分析。使用ROBINS - I和RoB - 2工具评估偏倚风险。样本量为1427例患者,平均年龄46.8岁。所有研究均显示在较低止血带阻断压力下有无血手术视野。荟萃分析显示,使用随机效应模型估计的总体平均止血带充气压力为169.3mmHg,95%置信区间为144.9 - 193.6。然而,报告结果中的异质性显著(<0.0001),这是本综述的一个局限性。本系统评价强调了使用较低止血带压力(低于标准250mmHg)以产生足够手术视野并影响手术结局的益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ceb/11943322/6e97f48e5623/jcm-14-01938-g0A1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验