Department of Health Law Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Health Law Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Sep;99(9):1798-1804. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 May 9.
To examine the validity of the self-report Work-Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB) physical function scales relative to clinician ratings of function and a performance-based functional capacity evaluation called the Physical Work Performance Evaluation (PWPE).
Cross-sectional.
Outpatient rehabilitation.
Adults (N=50) participating in physical therapy for musculoskeletal conditions.
Not applicable.
Patients completed the PWPE and the WD-FAB physical function scales including Changing and Maintaining Body Position, Whole Body Mobility, Upper Body Function, and Upper Extremity Fine Motor. The physical therapist also answered the WD-FAB questions on the patient's physical functioning. The WD-FAB computer-adaptive test version administered up to 10 items for each scale. The PWPE produces ratings from 0 to 5 indicating overall Level of Work ability: 0 (unable to work); 1 (sedentary); 2 (light); 3 (medium); 4 (heavy); 5 (very heavy). The PWPE also produces Level of Work ability ratings in the Dynamic Strength, Position Tolerance, and Mobility subsections.
Participating in the study were 50 patients with 1 or more conditions (shoulder, n=21; knee, n=16; low back, n=13; ankle/foot, n=10; neck, n=8; hip, n=7). The patient-based WD-FAB scores demonstrated moderate, statistically significant correlations with the provider proxy WD-FAB report (R=.49-.65). The WD-FAB Upper Body Function scale scores demonstrated moderate strength relationships with the PWPE overall ratings. The Whole Body Mobility and Changing and Maintaining Body Position scales did not demonstrate statistically significant relationships with the PWPE overall ratings.
We found moderate evidence for validity for the WD-FAB Upper Body Function, Whole Body Mobility, and Changing and Maintaining Body Position scales relative to clinician report and varied evidence relative to the PWPE in this clinical sample.
考察自我报告的工作障碍功能评估电池(WD-FAB)物理功能量表相对于临床医生对功能的评估以及称为物理工作绩效评估(PWPE)的基于绩效的功能能力评估的有效性。
横断面研究。
门诊康复。
参加肌肉骨骼疾病物理治疗的成年人(N=50)。
不适用。
患者完成了 PWPE 和 WD-FAB 物理功能量表,包括改变和维持身体姿势、全身移动、上半身功能和上肢精细运动。物理治疗师还回答了 WD-FAB 关于患者身体功能的问题。WD-FAB 计算机自适应测试版本为每个量表最多提供 10 个项目。PWPE 产生 0 到 5 的评分,表明整体工作能力水平:0(无法工作);1(久坐);2(轻);3(中);4(重);5(非常重)。PWPE 还在动态强度、位置耐受性和移动性子部分中产生工作能力水平评分。
共有 50 名患者参与了研究,这些患者有 1 种或多种疾病(肩部,n=21;膝盖,n=16;下背部,n=13;脚踝/脚,n=10;颈部,n=8;臀部,n=7)。基于患者的 WD-FAB 评分与提供者代理 WD-FAB 报告显示出中度的统计学显著相关性(R=.49-.65)。WD-FAB 上半身功能量表评分与 PWPE 总体评分具有中度的强度关系。全身移动和改变和维持身体姿势量表与 PWPE 总体评分没有显示出统计学上的显著关系。
在这个临床样本中,我们发现 WD-FAB 上半身功能、全身移动和改变和维持身体姿势量表相对于临床医生报告具有中度的有效性证据,而相对于 PWPE 的证据则各不相同。