Meterko Mark, Marfeo Elizabeth E, McDonough Christine M, Jette Alan M, Ni Pengsheng, Bogusz Kara, Rasch Elizabeth K, Brandt Diane E, Chan Leighton
Health and Disability Research Institute, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA; VA Boston Healthcare System, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Boston, MA.
Health and Disability Research Institute, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jun;96(6):1028-35. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.025. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
To assess the feasibility and psychometric properties of 8 scales covering 2 domains of the newly developed Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB): physical function (PF) and behavioral health (BH) function.
Cross-sectional study.
Community.
Adults (N=973) unable to work because of a physical (n=497) or a mental (n=476) disability.
Not applicable.
Each disability group responded to a survey consisting of the relevant WD-FAB scales and existing measures of established validity. The WD-FAB scales were evaluated with regard to data quality (score distribution, percentage of "I don't know" responses), efficiency of administration (number of items required to achieve reliability criterion, time required to complete the scale) by computerized adaptive testing (CAT), and measurement accuracy as tested by person fit. Construct validity was assessed by examining both convergent and discriminant correlations between the WD-FAB scales and scores on same-domain and cross-domain established measures.
Data quality was good, and CAT efficiency was high across both WD-FAB domains. Measurement accuracy was very good for PF scales; BH scales demonstrated more variability. Construct validity correlations, both convergent and divergent, between all WD-FAB scales and established measures were in the expected direction and range of magnitude.
The data quality, CAT efficiency, person fit, and construct validity of the WD-FAB scales were well supported and suggest that the WD-FAB could be used to assess PF and BH function related to work disability. Variation in scale performance suggests the need for future work on item replenishment and refinement, particularly with regard to the Self-Efficacy scale.
评估新开发的工作残疾功能评估量表组(WD-FAB)涵盖的2个领域(身体功能(PF)和行为健康(BH)功能)的8个量表的可行性和心理测量特性。
横断面研究。
社区。
因身体残疾(n = 497)或精神残疾(n = 476)而无法工作的成年人(N = 973)。
不适用。
每个残疾组都对一项调查做出了回应,该调查包括相关的WD-FAB量表和已确立有效性的现有测量方法。通过计算机自适应测试(CAT)对WD-FAB量表的数据质量(分数分布、“我不知道”回答的百分比)、施测效率(达到信度标准所需的项目数量、完成量表所需的时间)以及通过个体拟合检验的测量准确性进行评估。通过检查WD-FAB量表与同领域和跨领域既定测量方法的分数之间的收敛和区分相关性来评估结构效度。
数据质量良好,并且在WD-FAB的两个领域中CAT效率都很高。PF量表的测量准确性非常好;BH量表表现出更大的变异性。所有WD-FAB量表与既定测量方法之间的收敛和发散结构效度相关性均在预期的方向和幅度范围内。
WD-FAB量表的数据质量、CAT效率、个体拟合和结构效度得到了充分支持,表明WD-FAB可用于评估与工作残疾相关的PF和BH功能。量表性能的差异表明未来需要在项目补充和完善方面开展工作,特别是关于自我效能量表。