Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacology, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Transplant Surgery Department, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Med Princ Pract. 2018;27(4):356-361. doi: 10.1159/000489970. Epub 2018 May 13.
To evaluate the effects of dipyrone on sensitivity to aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]) in patients who underwent peripheral artery vascular reconstruction.
Impedance aggregometry and light transmission aggregometry were used to determine the effects of dipyrone on ASA treatment in 21 patients. Blood samples were drawn in a 7-day period after the surgery. The cut-off value for high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) was set at < 65% of aggregation inhibition for impedance aggregometry. For light transmission aggregometry the cut-off value for arachidonic acid-induced aggregation was set at > 20% of aggregating platelets, and the cut-off value for epinephrine-induced aggregation was > 44% of aggregating platelets. The cut-off value for each method was derived from a large number of patients treated with a daily dose of 100 mg of ASA.
We found HTPR in 14 (67%) of the 21 patients. None had primary resistance to ASA, i.e., after the addition of ASA in vitro all samples showed antiplatelet efficacy. Regression analysis showed a possible correlation between lower efficacy of ASA treatment and higher daily doses of dipyrone (p = 0.005 for impedance aggregometry, p = 0.04 for light transmission aggregometry), higher platelet count (p = 0.005 for impedance aggregometry), and shorter time from surgery (p = 0.03 for impedance aggregometry).
HTPR occurs in 67% of ASA-treated patients after lower limb vascular surgery. The occurrence of HTPR correlates with the daily dose of dipyrone. Therefore, dipyrone should not be used as a postoperative analgesic in ASA-treated patients after peripheral artery revascularisation due to its influence on the effectiveness of ASA.
评估双氯芬酸对行外周动脉血管重建术患者阿司匹林(乙酰水杨酸)敏感性的影响。
采用阻抗聚集法和透光比浊法测定 21 例患者双氯芬酸对阿司匹林治疗的影响。术后 7 天内采血。阻抗聚集法中高反应血小板治疗(HTPR)的截断值设定为聚集抑制<65%。对于透光比浊法,花生四烯酸诱导聚集的截断值设定为聚集血小板>20%,肾上腺素诱导聚集的截断值设定为聚集血小板>44%。每种方法的截断值均来自大量接受 100mg/d 剂量阿司匹林治疗的患者。
我们发现 21 例患者中有 14 例(67%)存在 HTPR。所有患者均无阿司匹林原发性耐药,即体外加入阿司匹林后所有样本均显示出抗血小板作用。回归分析显示,阿司匹林治疗效果较低与双氯芬酸日剂量较高(阻抗聚集法 p=0.005,透光比浊法 p=0.04)、血小板计数较高(阻抗聚集法 p=0.005)和手术时间较短(阻抗聚集法 p=0.03)之间可能存在相关性。
下肢血管手术后,67%接受阿司匹林治疗的患者出现 HTPR。HTPR 的发生与双氯芬酸的日剂量相关。因此,在外周动脉血运重建术后接受阿司匹林治疗的患者中,由于双氯芬酸对阿司匹林有效性的影响,不应将其用作术后镇痛剂。