Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Centre, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Pharmacology. 2010;85(4):241-7. doi: 10.1159/000285167. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
In the present study, we investigated prospectively whether an existing platelet hyporesponsiveness to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) can be transferred to platelets with a previously normal reactivity to ASA. Therefore, 80 patients who had undergone coronary bypass surgery were selected, and the efficacy of their oral aspirin therapy was tested. Platelet aggregation was measured by means of light transmission aggregometry (LTA) after stimulation by 1 mmol/l arachidonic acid (ARA) as well as by 1 mmol/l ARA + in vitro addition of 25 micromol/l ASA. The threshold for a sufficient inhibition of platelet aggregation was set to < or = 30% aggregation after ARA stimulation. A group of healthy volunteers with normal, almost complete inhibition of ARA-induced aggregation after in vitro addition of ASA served as control (group A). On the basis of the LTA measurement, 20 patients exhibited a hyporesponsiveness to oral and in vitro ASA (group B). Despite oral ASA treatment, in these patients ARA stimulation still induced aggregation, which could not be inhibited by in vitro addition of ASA. If group B plasma (from these hyporesponsive patients) was added to group A platelets (with normal reaction to ASA), this resulted in a conversion to hyporesponsive platelets, which then showed full aggregation in response to ARA (81%), and which could no longer be inhibited by in vitro ASA addition. In contrast, the normal ASA-responsive patients (group C) exhibited a nearly complete inhibition of ARA-induced aggregation by ASA. If group C plasma was incubated with group A platelets, ARA-induced aggregation could nearly completely be inhibited by in vitro addition of aspirin (ARA aggregation before ASA: 79%; after ASA addition: 7%). In conclusion, it can be stated that platelet hyporesponsiveness to ASA seems to be mediated by a transferable plasma factor.
在本研究中,我们前瞻性地研究了是否可以将先前对乙酰水杨酸(ASA)反应低下的血小板的低反应性转移到对 ASA 反应正常的血小板。因此,选择了 80 例接受冠状动脉旁路手术的患者,并测试了他们的口服阿司匹林治疗效果。通过透光比浊法(LTA)测量血小板聚集,在刺激物 1mmol/L 花生四烯酸(ARA)以及在体外添加 25μmol/L ASA 的情况下测量血小板聚集。血小板聚集抑制率<或=30%作为血小板聚集抑制充分的阈值。一组健康志愿者,在体外添加 ASA 后,血小板聚集几乎完全抑制,用 ARA 刺激后作为对照(A 组)。根据 LTA 测量,20 例患者对口服和体外 ASA 反应低下(B 组)。尽管给予口服 ASA 治疗,但在这些患者中,ARA 刺激仍诱导聚集,而体外添加 ASA 不能抑制聚集。如果将 B 组血浆(来自这些低反应性患者)加入到 A 组血小板(对 ASA 反应正常)中,则导致血小板转化为低反应性,血小板对 ARA 产生完全聚集(81%),并且体外添加 ASA 不能再抑制聚集。相比之下,正常 ASA 反应性患者(C 组)通过 ASA 对 ARA 诱导的聚集几乎完全抑制。如果将 C 组血浆与 A 组血小板孵育,体外添加 ASA 可几乎完全抑制 ARA 诱导的聚集(ASA 处理前的 ARA 聚集:79%;ASA 添加后:7%)。总之,可以说,血小板对 ASA 的低反应性似乎是由可转移的血浆因子介导的。