• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

切口疝修补术不良预后的危险因素:从国家切口疝注册登记处(EVEREG)获得的经验教训。

Risk factors for bad outcomes in incisional hernia repair: Lessons learned from the National Registry of Incisional Hernia (EVEREG).

作者信息

Pereira José Antonio, Montcusí Blanca, López-Cano Manuel, Hernández-Granados Pilar, Fresno de Prado Laura

机构信息

Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitari del Mar, Barcelona, España; Departament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, España.

Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitari del Mar, Barcelona, España.

出版信息

Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2018 Aug-Sep;96(7):436-442. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 May 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ciresp.2018.03.008
PMID:29754694
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Registries are powerful tools for identifying factors predicting bad results. Our objective was to analyse data from the Spanish Registry of Incisional Hernia (EVEREG) to detect risk situations for the development of complications and recurrences.

METHODS

We have analysed data of the cohort of hernias registered during the period from July 2012 to June 2014. We have compared the data between complicated and non-complicated patients in the short and long term follow-up. Data compared were: patient demographics, comorbid condition, hernia defect characteristics and surgical technique to determine which of them may be predictors of poor outcomes.

RESULTS

During the period of study, we collected data from 1,336 hernias (43.7% males; 56.3% females) with a mean age of 63.6 years (SD 12.4) and BMI of 30.4 (SD 5.4). In the multivariate analysis, factors associated with complications were: age >70 years, previous neoplasm, diameter greater than 10cm, previous repair and bowel resection. Factors related with recurrences were: parastomal hernia, previous repair, emergency repair, postoperative complications and reoperation. A separation of components was the only protective factor for this type of analysis (OR 0.438; CI 0.27-0.71; p=0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors for the development of complications and recurrences must be considered for promoting preoperative patient prehabilitation, planning the surgical technique and referring patients to specialized abdominal wall units.

摘要

引言

登记系统是识别预测不良结果因素的有力工具。我们的目的是分析西班牙切口疝登记系统(EVEREG)的数据,以检测并发症和复发发生的风险情况。

方法

我们分析了2012年7月至2014年6月期间登记的疝队列数据。我们比较了短期和长期随访中复杂和非复杂患者的数据。比较的数据包括:患者人口统计学、合并症、疝缺损特征和手术技术,以确定哪些因素可能是不良结果的预测因素。

结果

在研究期间,我们收集了1336例疝的数据(男性占43.7%;女性占56.3%),平均年龄为63.6岁(标准差12.4),体重指数为30.4(标准差5.4)。在多变量分析中,与并发症相关的因素有:年龄>70岁、既往有肿瘤、直径大于10cm、既往有修补术和肠切除术。与复发相关的因素有:造口旁疝、既往有修补术、急诊修补、术后并发症和再次手术。成分分离是这类分析的唯一保护因素(比值比0.438;可信区间0.27 - 0.71;p = 0.0001)。

结论

为了促进术前患者的预康复、规划手术技术以及将患者转诊至专业腹壁治疗单位,必须考虑并发症和复发发生的危险因素。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for bad outcomes in incisional hernia repair: Lessons learned from the National Registry of Incisional Hernia (EVEREG).切口疝修补术不良预后的危险因素:从国家切口疝注册登记处(EVEREG)获得的经验教训。
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2018 Aug-Sep;96(7):436-442. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 May 10.
2
Initial results of the National Registry of Incisional Hernia.国家切口疝登记处的初步结果。
Cir Esp. 2016 Dec;94(10):595-602. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
3
Early outcomes of component separation techniques: an analysis of the Spanish registry of incisional Hernia (EVEREG).组件分离技术的早期结果:西班牙切口疝登记处(EVEREG)的分析。
Hernia. 2021 Dec;25(6):1573-1580. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02449-x. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
4
Long-term Recurrence and Complications Associated With Elective Incisional Hernia Repair.择期切口疝修补术后的长期复发和并发症。
JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1575-1582. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.15217.
5
Parestomal hernia repair. Prospective observational study based on the Spanish Registry of Incisional Hernia (EVEREG).造口旁疝修补术。基于西班牙切口疝登记处(EVEREG)的前瞻性观察研究。
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2021 Aug-Sep;99(7):527-534. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2021.06.016. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
6
The evolution of incisional hernia repair in Spain. A comparative analysis of results from the EVEREG registry.西班牙切口疝修补术的发展。EVEREG注册研究结果的比较分析。
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2024 May;102(5):275-280. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2023.11.021. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
7
Incisional hernia recurrence after open elective repair: expertise in abdominal wall surgery matters.开放择期修补术后切口疝复发:腹壁手术专业技能至关重要。
BMC Surg. 2019 Aug 7;19(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0569-6.
8
Lateral incisional hernia. EVEREG registry analysis.外侧切口疝。EVEREG 注册研究分析。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1769-1774. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03073-1. Epub 2024 May 21.
9
Umbilical incisional hernias (M3): are trocar-site hernias different? Comparative analysis of the EVEREG registry⋆.脐部切口疝(M3):trocar-site 疝是否不同?EVEREG 注册研究的对比分析。
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2022 Jun;100(6):336-344. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2022.05.023. Epub 2022 May 23.
10
Female sex as independent risk factor for chronic pain following elective incisional hernia repair: registry-based, propensity score-matched comparison.女性性别是择期切口疝修补术后慢性疼痛的独立危险因素:基于登记的、倾向评分匹配比较。
Hernia. 2020 Jun;24(3):567-576. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02089-2. Epub 2019 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Simultaneous incisional hernia repair and colorectal surgery: one or two-step procedure?同期切口疝修补术和结直肠手术:一步法还是两步法?
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2321-2332. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03164-z. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
2
The influence of a multidisciplinary team meeting and prehabilitation on complex abdominal wall hernia repair outcomes.多学科团队会议和预康复对复杂腹壁疝修补术结果的影响。
Hernia. 2023 Jun;27(3):609-616. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02755-6. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
3
Slowly resorbable biosynthetic mesh: 2-year results in VHWG grade 3 hernia repair.
可缓慢吸收的生物合成补片:VHWG 3 级疝修补术 2 年的结果。
Hernia. 2022 Feb;26(1):131-138. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02453-1. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
4
A systematic review of outcome reporting in incisional hernia surgery.切口疝手术结局报告的系统评价。
BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab006.
5
The reality of general surgery training and increased complexity of abdominal wall hernia surgery.普通外科培训的现实和腹壁疝手术复杂性的增加。
Hernia. 2019 Dec;23(6):1081-1091. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02062-z. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
6
Incisional hernia recurrence after open elective repair: expertise in abdominal wall surgery matters.开放择期修补术后切口疝复发:腹壁手术专业技能至关重要。
BMC Surg. 2019 Aug 7;19(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0569-6.
7
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation as Conservative Management for a Large Abdominal Wound Following Incarcerated Parastomal Hernia Repair.以滴注法进行负压伤口治疗作为嵌顿性造口旁疝修补术后大腹部伤口的保守治疗方法
Cureus. 2018 Dec 13;10(12):e3728. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3728.