• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

普通外科培训的现实和腹壁疝手术复杂性的增加。

The reality of general surgery training and increased complexity of abdominal wall hernia surgery.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité Medical School, Vivantes Hospital, Neue Bergstrasse 6, 13585, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.

出版信息

Hernia. 2019 Dec;23(6):1081-1091. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02062-z. Epub 2019 Nov 21.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-019-02062-z
PMID:31754953
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6938469/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Accreditation and Certification of Hernia Centers and Surgeons (ACCESS) Group of the European Hernia Society (EHS) recognizes that there is a growing need to train specialist abdominal wall surgeons. The most important and relevant argument for this proposal and statement is the growing acceptance of the increasing complexity of abdominal wall surgery due to newer techniques, more challenging cases and the required 'tailored' approach to such surgery. There is now also an increasing public awareness with social media, whereby optimal treatment results are demanded by patients. However, to date the complexity of abdominal wall surgery has not been properly or adequately defined in the current literature.

METHODS

A systematic search of the available literature was performed in May 2019 using Medline, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Springer Link, and the Cochrane Library, with 75 publications identified as relevant. In addition, an analysis of data from the Herniamed Hernia Registry was performed. The percentage of patients with hernia- or patient-related characteristics which unfavorably impacted the outcome of inguinal and incisional hernia repair was also calculated.

RESULTS

All present guidelines for abdominal wall surgery recommend the utilization of a 'tailored' approach. This relies on the prerequisite that any surgical technique used has already been mastered, as well as the recognized learning curves for each of the several techniques that can be used for both inguinal hernia (Lichtenstein, TEP, TAPP, Shouldice) and incisional hernia repairs (laparoscopic IPOM, open sublay, open IPOM, open onlay, open or endoscopic component separation technique). Other hernia- and patient-related characteristics that have recognized complexity include emergency surgery, obesity, recurrent hernias, bilateral inguinal hernias, groin hernia in women, scrotal hernias, large defects, high ASA scores, > 80 years of age, increased medical risk factors and previous lower abdominal surgery. The proportion of patients with at least one of these characteristics in the Herniamed Hernia Registry in the case of both inguinal and incisional hernia is noted to be relatively high at around 70%. In general surgery training approximately 50-100 hernia repairs on average are performed by each trainee, with around only 25 laparo-endoscopic procedures.

CONCLUSION

A tailored approach is now employed and seen more so in hernia surgery and this fact is referred to and highlighted in the contemporaneous hernia guidelines published to date. In addition, with the increasing complexity of abdominal wall surgery, the number of procedures actually performed by trainees is no longer considered adequate to overcome any recognized learning curve. Therefore, to supplement general surgery training young surgeons should be offered a clinical fellowship to obtain an additional qualification as an abdominal wall surgeon and thus improve their clinical and operative experience under supervision in this field. Practicing general surgeons with a special interest in hernia surgery can undertake intensive further training in this area by participating in clinical work shadowing in hernia centers, workshops and congresses.

摘要

简介

疝和腹壁外科学会(EHS)的疝中心和外科医生认证和认证(ACCESS)小组认识到,培训专业腹壁外科医生的需求日益增长。提出这一建议和声明的最重要和最相关的论点是,由于新技术、更具挑战性的病例以及对这种手术的“量身定制”方法的要求,腹壁手术的复杂性日益增加。现在,社交媒体也提高了公众的认识,患者要求获得最佳的治疗效果。然而,迄今为止,当前文献中并未对腹壁手术的复杂性进行适当或充分的定义。

方法

2019 年 5 月,使用 Medline、PubMed、Scopus、Embase、Springer Link 和 Cochrane 图书馆对现有文献进行了系统搜索,确定了 75 篇相关文献。此外,还对 Herniamed 疝登记处的数据进行了分析。还计算了与疝或患者相关的特征的百分比,这些特征对腹股沟疝和切口疝修复的结果产生了不利影响。

结果

所有现有的腹壁手术指南都建议采用“量身定制”的方法。这依赖于以下前提,即使用的任何手术技术都已掌握,以及每种可用于腹股沟疝(Lichtenstein、TEP、TAPP、Shouldice)和切口疝修复(腹腔镜 IPOM、开放式下衬垫、开放式 IPOM、开放式上衬垫、开放式或内镜组件分离技术)的技术的公认学习曲线。其他与疝和患者相关的具有公认复杂性的特征包括急诊手术、肥胖、复发性疝、双侧腹股沟疝、女性腹股沟疝、阴囊疝、大缺损、ASA 评分高、>80 岁、增加的医疗风险因素和先前的下腹部手术。在 Herniamed 疝登记处,腹股沟疝和切口疝的患者中至少有一个这些特征的比例相对较高,约为 70%。在普通外科培训中,每位受训者平均进行 50-100 例疝修复,腹腔镜内镜手术约为 25 例。

结论

现在采用了量身定制的方法,在疝外科中更为常见,这一事实在迄今为止发表的当代疝指南中有所提及和强调。此外,随着腹壁外科手术复杂性的增加,受训者实际进行的手术数量不再被认为足以克服任何公认的学习曲线。因此,为了补充普通外科培训,应向年轻外科医生提供临床研究员职位,以获得腹壁外科医生的额外资格,从而在该领域的监督下提高他们的临床和手术经验。对疝外科有特殊兴趣的普通外科医生可以通过参加疝中心的临床工作观摩、研讨会和大会来接受该领域的强化进一步培训。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d18/6938469/93969aa65ea9/10029_2019_2062_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d18/6938469/93969aa65ea9/10029_2019_2062_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d18/6938469/93969aa65ea9/10029_2019_2062_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The reality of general surgery training and increased complexity of abdominal wall hernia surgery.普通外科培训的现实和腹壁疝手术复杂性的增加。
Hernia. 2019 Dec;23(6):1081-1091. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02062-z. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
2
International guidelines for groin hernia management.腹股沟疝治疗的国际指南。
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
3
Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS))-Part A.腹腔镜治疗腹前壁和切口疝指南更新(国际腹内疝学会(IEHS))-A 部分。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3069-3139. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06907-7. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
4
Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)): Part B.腹腔镜治疗腹侧和切口腹壁疝指南更新(国际腹内疝学会 (IEHS)):B 部分。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3511-3549. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06908-6. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
5
Analysis of 4,015 recurrent incisional hernia repairs from the Herniamed registry: risk factors and outcomes.对来自Herniamed注册中心的4015例复发性切口疝修补术的分析:危险因素和结果。
Hernia. 2021 Feb;25(1):61-75. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02263-x. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
6
[Abdominal wall hernias part 2 : Operative treatment techniques].[腹壁疝 第2部分:手术治疗技术]
Chirurg. 2021 Aug;92(8):755-768. doi: 10.1007/s00104-021-01383-z. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
7
Interposition of the omentum and/or the peritoneum in the emergency repair of large ventral hernias with polypropylene mesh.网膜和/或腹膜在聚丙烯网片急诊修补大型腹壁疝中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(6):578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
8
Achieving the Learning Curve in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair by Tapp: A Quality Improvement Study.通过经腹膜前修补术实现腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的学习曲线:一项质量改进研究。
J Invest Surg. 2019 Dec;32(8):738-745. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2018.1468944. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
9
TEP for elective primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair in men: what do we know?TEP 治疗男性择期原发性单侧腹股沟疝修补术:我们了解多少?
Hernia. 2019 Jun;23(3):439-459. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01936-6. Epub 2019 May 6.
10
Accreditation and certification requirements for hernia centers and surgeons: the ACCESS project.疝中心和外科医生的认证和认可要求:ACCESS 项目。
Hernia. 2019 Apr;23(2):185-203. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1873-2. Epub 2019 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of mesh-related factors associated with recurrence and treatment outcomes after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后与复发及治疗效果相关的补片相关因素分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep 13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12209-y.
2
What is the preferred mesh placement in primary ventral hernia repair? An international survey of 442 surgeons.在原发性腹疝修补术中,哪种补片放置方式更可取?一项针对442名外科医生的国际调查。
Hernia. 2025 Sep 9;29(1):273. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03429-1.
3
Structured Training in Robotic Abdominal Wall Surgery: A Systematic Review of Educational Models, Methodologies, Existing Gaps and Unmet Needs.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review.腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛的危险因素:一项系统评价
Innov Surg Sci. 2017 May 12;2(2):61-68. doi: 10.1515/iss-2017-0017. eCollection 2017 Jun.
2
Risk factors for perioperative complications in inguinal hernia repair - a systematic review.腹股沟疝修补术围手术期并发症的危险因素——一项系统评价
Innov Surg Sci. 2017 Feb 25;2(2):47-52. doi: 10.1515/iss-2017-0008. eCollection 2017 Jun.
3
Abdominal wall hernia surgery in The Netherlands: a national survey.荷兰腹壁疝手术:一项全国性调查。
机器人腹壁手术的结构化培训:教育模式、方法、现有差距及未满足需求的系统评价
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Aug 18;4:15190. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.15190. eCollection 2025.
4
Earlier Experience of Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair With the New Hugo™ Robotic System in Europe.欧洲使用新型Hugo™机器人系统进行机器人腹股沟疝修补术的早期经验。
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Mar 31;4:13880. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.13880. eCollection 2025.
5
Evaluating surgical techniques for incarcerated incisional hernia: laparoscopic vs. Open repair in a tertiary care setting.评估嵌顿性切口疝的手术技术:三级医疗环境下腹腔镜与开放修补术的比较
Hernia. 2025 Mar 12;29(1):116. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03311-0.
6
Comparison of Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair (IPOM plus) vs Open Rives-Stoppa (RS) Repair for Ventral and Incisional Hernia.腹腔镜腹膜内补片植入修补术(IPOM加)与开放性里夫斯-斯托帕(RS)修补术治疗腹直肌旁疝和切口疝的比较
Acta Med Litu. 2024;31(2):288-293. doi: 10.15388/Amed.2024.31.2.11. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
7
Complex abdomen: a scoping review.复杂腹部:一项范围综述
Hernia. 2025 Feb 10;29(1):90. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03270-6.
8
Clinical outcomes from robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in patients under and over 70 years old: a single institution retrospective cohort study with a comprehensive systematic review on behalf of TROGSS - The Robotic Global Surgical Society.70岁及以上和70岁以下患者经腹腹膜前入路机器人腹股沟疝修补术的临床结果:一项单机构回顾性队列研究,并代表机器人全球外科学会(TROGSS)进行全面系统综述。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024 Dec 24;37(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s40520-024-02890-9.
9
Learning Curves for Robotic-Assisted Ventral Hernia Repair.机器人辅助腹疝修补术的学习曲线
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2448521. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48521.
10
Minimally invasive intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus (IPOM +) repair versus enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (e-TEP) repair for ventral hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创腹腔内补片植入术联合(IPOM+)修补术与增强视野完全腹膜外(e-TEP)修补术治疗腹疝的系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):1251-1260. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11377-7. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
Hernia. 2020 Jun;24(3):601-611. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02048-x. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
4
Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS))-Part A.腹腔镜治疗腹前壁和切口疝指南更新(国际腹内疝学会(IEHS))-A 部分。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3069-3139. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06907-7. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
5
Decline of open surgical experience for general surgery residents.普通外科住院医师开放手术经验的下降。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):967-972. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06881-0. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
6
Recurrent Incisional Hernia Repair-An Overview.复发性切口疝修补术——概述
Front Surg. 2019 May 14;6:26. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00026. eCollection 2019.
7
Impact of body mass index on minimally invasive ventral hernia repair: an ACS-NSQIP analysis.体重指数对微创腹疝修补术的影响:ACS-NSQIP 分析。
Hernia. 2019 Oct;23(5):899-907. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01944-6. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
8
Influencing Factors on the Outcome in Female Groin Hernia Repair: A Registry-based Multivariable Analysis of 15,601 Patients.女性腹股沟疝修补术结局的影响因素:基于注册的 15601 例患者的多变量分析。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jul;270(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003271.
9
Groin Hernias in Women-A Review of the Literature.女性腹股沟疝——文献综述
Front Surg. 2019 Feb 11;6:4. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00004. eCollection 2019.
10
Effect of Previous Lower Abdominal Surgery on Outcomes Following Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) Inguinal Hernia Repair.既往下腹部手术对完全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术后结局的影响。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2019 Aug;29(4):267-270. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000633.