Suppr超能文献

评估肝硬化患者住院期间的预后:淋巴细胞/单核细胞比值与终末期肝病模型(MELD)及Child-Pugh评分的比较

Assessing the outcome of patients with liver cirrhosis during hospital stay: A comparison of lymphocyte/monocyte ratio with MELD and Child-Pugh scores.

作者信息

Jamil Zubia, Durrani Asghar Aurangzeb

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Foundation University Medical College, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Department of Medicine, Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Turk J Gastroenterol. 2018 May;29(3):308-315. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2018.17631.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Developing an easy and reliable score for evaluating the prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis has always been challenging for hepatologists. This study aimed to assess the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in comparison with the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and Child-Pugh (CP) scores for determining the outcomes in these patients during hospital stay.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the efficacy of three parameters (LMR and MELD and CP scores) in determining the outcomes in 182 patients with cirrhosis. The cutoff values were calculated using Youden index, and the area under the curves (AUCs) was also compared. The associations of these scores between the survived and nonsurvived group was studied. The predictors of patient survival were determined using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The mean values for LMR and MELD and CP scores were 6.23, 11.62, and 9.32, respectively. MELD and CP were positively correlated with each other. LMR was negatively correlated to both MELD and CP scores (p=0.04). Pairwise comparison showed that the difference between the AUCs of MELD and LMR was not statistically significant (0.958 vs. 0.807; p > 0.05). With the LMR cutoff value of > 3.31 (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 74.83%), patients were segregated into low and high LMR groups. MELD and CP scores were significantly higher in the low LMR group than in the high LMR group (p=0.000). Patients in the low LMR group showed decreased survival than those in the high LMR group (p=0.000). The nonsurvived group had lower LMR and higher MELD and CP scores than those of the survived group (p=0.000). Logistic regression model showed MELD (p=0.000), CP score (p=0.010), 1/LMR (p=0.004), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level (p=0.010), and international normalized ratio (INR; p=0.043) as predictors of outcome of these patients.

CONCLUSION

LMR can be used to determine the outcome of patients during hospital stay, because it is easy to calculate and can be interpreted with efficacy nearly equal to those of MELD and CP scores.

摘要

背景/目的:开发一种简单可靠的评分系统来评估肝硬化患者的预后,一直是肝病学家面临的挑战。本研究旨在评估淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值(LMR),并与终末期肝病模型(MELD)和Child-Pugh(CP)评分相比较,以确定这些患者住院期间的预后情况。

材料与方法

采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估182例肝硬化患者的三个参数(LMR、MELD和CP评分)在判断预后方面的效能。使用约登指数计算临界值,并比较曲线下面积(AUC)。研究了存活组和非存活组之间这些评分的相关性。采用逻辑回归分析确定患者生存的预测因素。

结果

LMR、MELD和CP评分的平均值分别为6.23、11.62和9.32。MELD和CP呈正相关。LMR与MELD和CP评分均呈负相关(p=0.04)。两两比较显示,MELD和LMR的AUC差异无统计学意义(0.958对0.807;p>0.05)。当LMR临界值>3.31时(敏感性为80%,特异性为74.83%),患者被分为低LMR组和高LMR组。低LMR组的MELD和CP评分显著高于高LMR组(p=0.000)。低LMR组患者的生存率低于高LMR组(p=0.000)。非存活组的LMR低于存活组,而MELD和CP评分高于存活组(p=0.000)。逻辑回归模型显示,MELD(p=0.000)、CP评分(p=0.010)、1/LMR(p=0.004)、丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)水平(p=0.010)和国际标准化比值(INR;p=0.043)是这些患者预后的预测因素。

结论

LMR可用于确定患者住院期间的预后,因为它易于计算,且其效能与MELD和CP评分相近,易于解读。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6

本文引用的文献

2
Immune Dysfunction in Cirrhosis.肝硬化中的免疫功能障碍
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2017 Mar 28;5(1):50-58. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2016.00056. Epub 2017 Mar 10.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验