Swai A B, Harrison K, Chuwa L M, Makene W, McLarty D, Alberti K G
Department of Medicine, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Diabet Med. 1988 Oct;5(7):648-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1988.tb01073.x.
The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for diabetes of serum fructosamine levels and fasting venous blood glucose concentrations were compared in 613 subjects during a diabetes community screening programme of 1049 adult Muslim Asians in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Using WHO (1985) criteria 228 had impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), 41 had previously been diagnosed as having diabetes while 32 had newly recognized diabetes. The mean (+/- SD) serum fructosamine levels were 20.9 +/- 3.2, 21.6 +/- 3.2, 23.9 +/- 4.9, and 30.1 +/- 7.9 (mumol g-1 albumin) in subjects with normal glucose tolerance, IGT, newly diagnosed diabetes, and previously diagnosed diabetes, respectively (p less than 0.001 for differences between groups). The specificity of values above the mean +2SD normal was 99% for abnormal glucose tolerance with a sensitivity of only 22% for diabetes. The predictive values were 44% and 97% for positive and negative results, respectively. Very little difference from normal was found for IGT subjects. Expressing fructosamine values in absolute terms or per gram albumin made little difference to sensitivity and specificity. The sensitivity was only 32% for fasting blood glucose greater than or equal to 6.7 mmol l-1, 73% for values greater than or equal to 5.5 mmol l-1, and 100% for fasting blood glucose greater than or equal to 4.5 mmol l-1. It is concluded that both serum fructosamine and fasting blood glucose are poor screening and diagnostic tests for diabetes and for IGT, and that glucose loading is required.
在坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆对1049名成年穆斯林亚洲人进行的糖尿病社区筛查项目中,对613名受试者的血清果糖胺水平和空腹静脉血糖浓度对糖尿病的诊断敏感性和特异性进行了比较。根据世界卫生组织(1985年)的标准,228人糖耐量受损(IGT),41人先前被诊断为患有糖尿病,32人新确诊为糖尿病。糖耐量正常、IGT、新诊断糖尿病和先前诊断糖尿病的受试者的平均(±标准差)血清果糖胺水平分别为20.9±3.2、21.6±3.2、23.9±4.9和30.1±7.9(μmol g-1白蛋白)(组间差异p<0.001)。高于正常均值+2标准差的值对糖耐量异常的特异性为99%,对糖尿病的敏感性仅为22%。阳性和阴性结果的预测值分别为44%和97%。IGT受试者与正常受试者差异极小。以绝对值或每克白蛋白表示果糖胺值对敏感性和特异性影响不大。空腹血糖≥6.7 mmol l-1时敏感性仅为32%,≥5.5 mmol l-1时为73%,≥4.5 mmol l-1时为100%。结论是血清果糖胺和空腹血糖对糖尿病和IGT都是较差的筛查和诊断试验,需要进行葡萄糖负荷试验。