Suppr超能文献

1,5-脱水葡萄糖醇、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和果糖胺用于检测糖尿病的比较

Comparison of 1,5-anhydroglucitol, HbA1c, and fructosamine for detection of diabetes mellitus.

作者信息

Yamanouchi T, Akanuma Y, Toyota T, Kuzuya T, Kawai T, Kawazu S, Yoshioka S, Kanazawa Y, Ohta M, Baba S

机构信息

School Department of Internal Medicine, University of Teikyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Diabetes. 1991 Jan;40(1):52-7. doi: 10.2337/diab.40.1.52.

Abstract

To evaluate the use of serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol (AG) levels in screening for diabetes mellitus, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of HbA1c, fructosamine (FA), and AG in 1620 randomly selected subjects in 11 institutions throughout Japan. Most individuals were receiving diet and/or drug therapy for diabetes. Subjects were separated into four groups based on World Health Organization criteria: nondiabetic control subjects, subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), patients with diabetes, and patients with other disorders without IGT. The overlap of AG values between each group was less than that of HbA1c or FA values. AG levels were significantly correlated with fasting plasma glucose (r = -0.627), HbA1c (r = -0.629), and FA (r = -0.590) levels. If we took 14 micrograms/ml as the normal lower limit, AG level was highly specific (93.1%), and a decreased AG level indicated diabetes mellitus (84.2% sensitivity). According to the selectivity index (sensitivity value times specificity value), AG determinations were superior to both HbA1c and FA measurements for diabetes screening. When combinations of these tests were used, only AG and HbA1c together were slightly better than AG alone. Thus, together with other advantages of AG, e.g., its wide variance with relatively fair glycemic control and the negligible influence of the sampling conditions, AG level has more potential than HbA1c or FA level as a screening criterion for diabetes.

摘要

为评估血清1,5 - 脱水葡萄糖醇(AG)水平在糖尿病筛查中的应用,我们在日本全国11个机构随机选取了1620名受试者,比较了糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、果糖胺(FA)和AG的敏感性及特异性。大多数个体正在接受糖尿病饮食和/或药物治疗。根据世界卫生组织标准,受试者被分为四组:非糖尿病对照组、糖耐量受损(IGT)受试者、糖尿病患者以及无IGT的其他疾病患者。每组之间AG值的重叠程度小于HbA1c或FA值。AG水平与空腹血糖(r = -0.627)、HbA1c(r = -0.629)和FA(r = -0.590)水平显著相关。若将14微克/毫升作为正常下限,AG水平具有高度特异性(93.1%),AG水平降低提示糖尿病(敏感性为84.2%)。根据选择性指数(敏感性值乘以特异性值),AG检测在糖尿病筛查方面优于HbA1c和FA检测。当联合使用这些检测时,仅AG和HbA1c联合使用略优于单独使用AG。因此,结合AG的其他优势,例如其在血糖控制相对良好时变化范围广以及采样条件影响可忽略不计,AG水平作为糖尿病筛查标准比HbA1c或FA水平更具潜力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验