DeStasio Krista L, Hill Anne P, Berkman Elliot T
Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
Department of Psychology, New York University, New York.
J Smok Cessat. 2018 Mar;13(1):55-58. doi: 10.1017/jsc.2016.27. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
Text-message-based interventions hold great potential for intervention and are increasingly feasible, given advances in information technology.
This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the efficacy of self-versus expert-authored content delivered via text-messaging for smoking cessation.
Sixty-two participants aged 25-66 attended laboratory sessions pre- and post-30 days of text-messaging intervention. Participants were randomised to one of two experimental conditions - self-authorship (SA) only and SA with implementation intentions (SA+ii) - or active control. Participants composed 30-60 brief motivational cessation messages for use during their cessation attempt. SA+ii participants were further instructed to anticipate obstacles and form simple if-then plans to overcome them. Experimental groups received their self-authored texts during the intervention phase, whereas control participants received expert-authored messages.
Overall, smoking decreased as measured by change in exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), (1,59) = 4.43, = 0.04. The SA+ii group showed slightly greater CO reduction ( = 3.63, = 5.39) than control ( = 0.03, = 5.80; (40) = 2.08, = 0.04). SA alone ( = 1.97, = 9.30) was not more effective than control.
SA does not appear to increase efficacy. However, this pilot supports prior research, indicating that text-based interventions can increase smoking cessation success and may decrease psychological symptoms of withdrawal. Much research is needed to identify ways to bolster intervention efficacy.
鉴于信息技术的进步,基于短信的干预措施具有巨大的干预潜力,并且越来越可行。
这项试点随机对照试验(RCT)旨在比较通过短信发送的自我撰写内容与专家撰写内容在戒烟方面的效果。
62名年龄在25至66岁之间的参与者在短信干预的30天前后参加了实验室会议。参与者被随机分配到两种实验条件之一——仅自我撰写(SA)和带有实施意图的自我撰写(SA+ii)——或积极对照。参与者撰写了30至60条简短的激励戒烟信息,以便在戒烟尝试期间使用。SA+ii组的参与者还被进一步指导预测障碍并制定简单的“如果……那么……”计划来克服它们。实验组在干预阶段收到他们自己撰写的文本,而对照组参与者收到专家撰写的信息。
总体而言,通过呼出一氧化碳(CO)的变化衡量,吸烟量有所下降,(1,59)= 4.43,P = 0.04。SA+ii组的CO减少量(M = 3.63,SD = 5.39)略高于对照组(M = 0.03,SD = 5.80;(40)= 2.08,P = 0.04)。仅SA组(M = 1.97,SD = 9.30)并不比对照组更有效。
自我撰写似乎并未提高效果。然而,这项试点研究支持了先前的研究,表明基于短信的干预措施可以提高戒烟成功率,并可能减轻戒断的心理症状。需要进行大量研究以确定增强干预效果的方法。