Vidaki Athina, Kalamara Vivian, Carnero-Montoro Elena, Spector Timothy D, Bell Jordana T, Kayser Manfred
Department of Genetic Identification, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, UK.
Genes (Basel). 2018 May 14;9(5):252. doi: 10.3390/genes9050252.
Monozygotic (MZ) twins are typically indistinguishable via forensic DNA profiling. Recently, we demonstrated that epigenetic differentiation of MZ twins is feasible; however, proportions of twin differentially methylated CpG sites (tDMSs) identified in reference-type blood DNA were not replicated in trace-type blood DNA. Here we investigated buccal swabs as typical forensic reference material, and saliva and cigarette butts as commonly encountered forensic trace materials. As an analog to a forensic case, we analyzed one MZ twin pair. Epigenome-wide microarray analysis in reference-type buccal DNA revealed 25 candidate tDMSs with >0.5 twin-to-twin differences. MethyLight quantitative PCR (qPCR) of 22 selected tDMSs in trace-type DNA revealed in saliva DNA that six tDMSs (27.3%) had >0.1 twin-to-twin differences, seven (31.8%) had smaller (<0.1) but robustly detected differences, whereas for nine (40.9%) the differences were in the opposite direction relative to the microarray data; for cigarette butt DNA, results were 50%, 22.7%, and 27.3%, respectively. The discrepancies between reference-type and trace-type DNA outcomes can be explained by cell composition differences, method-to-method variation, and other technical reasons including bisulfite conversion inefficiency. Our study highlights the importance of the DNA source and that careful characterization of biological and technical effects is needed before epigenetic MZ twin differentiation is applicable in forensic casework.
通过法医DNA分析,同卵双胞胎通常难以区分。最近,我们证明了同卵双胞胎的表观遗传分化是可行的;然而,在参考类型血液DNA中鉴定出的双胞胎差异甲基化CpG位点(tDMSs)的比例在痕量类型血液DNA中并未得到重复验证。在此,我们研究了作为典型法医参考材料的口腔拭子,以及作为常见法医痕量材料的唾液和烟头。作为法医案例的模拟,我们分析了一对同卵双胞胎。参考类型口腔DNA的全表观基因组微阵列分析揭示了25个候选tDMSs,双胞胎之间的差异>0.5。对痕量类型DNA中22个选定的tDMSs进行甲基化荧光定量PCR(qPCR)分析发现,在唾液DNA中,6个tDMSs(27.3%)的双胞胎之间差异>0.1,7个(31.8%)的差异较小(<0.1)但能可靠检测到,而9个(40.9%)的差异方向与微阵列数据相反;对于烟头DNA,结果分别为50%、22.7%和27.3%。参考类型和痕量类型DNA结果之间的差异可以通过细胞组成差异、方法间变异以及其他技术原因(包括亚硫酸氢盐转化效率低下)来解释。我们的研究强调了DNA来源的重要性,并且在表观遗传同卵双胞胎分化应用于法医案件工作之前,需要仔细表征生物学和技术效应。