Komo Larissa, Grassberger Martin
Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria; CHU Lille, EA 7367 - UTML - Unité de Taphonomie Médico-Légale, University of Lille, 59000 Lille, France.
Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria; Faculty of Medicine, Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria; Department of Paediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Jul;288:189-200. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.048. Epub 2018 May 1.
Tool marks on bones induced by knife blades can be analysed morphometrically in order to enable an allocation of the suspected "inflicting weapon" to the particular morphology of the bone lesions. Until now, geometric morphometrics has not been used to analyse the morphology of knife lesions on fleshed bones in detail. By using twelve experimental knives and a drop weight tower, stab/cut injuries were inflicted on untreated pig ribs. The morphology of the experimentally produced lesions was subsequently recorded with three imaging techniques (μCT, macro photography and SEM) and analysed with different morphometric software (Amira, tps and Morpheus). Based on the measured distances between the walls of the kerf marks, which corresponded to the thickness of the blade, one could conclude to the respective blade thickness with a deviation of max. ±0.35mm and match the injuries to the knives. With subsequent reanalysis after maceration, an average shrinkage factor up to 8.6% was observed. Among the three imaging techniques used in this study, μCT was the most accurate and efficient technique, particularly because it represented the only non-destructive modality to document injuries without maceration, even though μCT is more expensive and time-consuming as well as less accessible than a macro SLR-camera or a SEM. For optimal characterizations of the blades' and kerfs' shapes the software tps proofed to be the best choice. Accordingly, geometric morphometrics could serve as a tool in forensic investigations concerning kerf marks.
为了将疑似“凶器”与骨损伤的特定形态进行匹配,可以对刀刃造成的骨上工具痕迹进行形态测量分析。到目前为止,尚未使用几何形态测量学来详细分析带肉骨上刀伤的形态。通过使用十二把实验刀具和一个落锤塔,在未经处理的猪肋骨上造成刺/切损伤。随后用三种成像技术(μCT、宏观摄影和扫描电子显微镜)记录实验产生的损伤形态,并用不同的形态测量软件(Amira、tps和Morpheus)进行分析。根据对应于刀刃厚度的锯痕壁之间的测量距离,可以得出各自刀刃厚度,最大偏差为±0.35毫米,并将损伤与刀具进行匹配。浸软后进行后续重新分析,观察到平均收缩率高达8.6%。在本研究中使用的三种成像技术中,μCT是最准确、最有效的技术,特别是因为它是唯一一种无需浸软就能记录损伤的非破坏性方法,尽管μCT比宏观单反相机或扫描电子显微镜更昂贵、更耗时,且不易获得。对于刀刃和锯痕形状的最佳表征,软件tps被证明是最佳选择。因此,几何形态测量学可作为法医调查中有关锯痕的一种工具。