• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Quality Reporting: Understanding National Priorities, Identifying Local Applicability.

作者信息

Schmitz DeLaine, Popovich Matthew T

机构信息

American Society of Anesthesiologists, 1061 American Lane, Schaumburg, IL 60173, USA.

American Society of Anesthesiologists, 905 16th Street Northwest, Suite 400, Washington, DC 20006, USA.

出版信息

Anesthesiol Clin. 2018 Jun;36(2):201-216. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2018.01.009.

DOI:10.1016/j.anclin.2018.01.009
PMID:29759283
Abstract

Since the 1990s, the use of quality measures in healthcare has grown exponentially. Practices must maintain current knowledge of measures that affect their clinicians locally and understand how assessment of these medical professionals affects the priorities and quality activities of practices and facilities. Because quality measures are increasingly used by hospital administrators, health plans, and payers, practices are being asked to shoulder the additional burdens of collecting and reporting data to various entities. Part of the solution to this increased burden often includes contracting with vendors and outside experts, as well as identifying effective local physician and practice champions.

摘要

相似文献

1
Quality Reporting: Understanding National Priorities, Identifying Local Applicability.
Anesthesiol Clin. 2018 Jun;36(2):201-216. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2018.01.009.
2
What can the national quality forum tell us about performance measurement in anesthesiology?国家质量论坛能告诉我们关于麻醉学绩效测量的什么信息?
Anesth Analg. 2015 Feb;120(2):440-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000553.
3
Preface. Finding the fourth branch-understanding quality-of-care in anesthesiology.前言。探寻第四个分支——理解麻醉学中的医疗质量。
Anesthesiol Clin. 2011 Mar;29(1):xv-xx. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2010.12.001.
4
Large databases in anaesthesiology.麻醉学领域的大型数据库。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015 Dec;28(6):697-702. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000243.
5
Ouality and performance measurement: national efforts to improve quality of care through measurement development.
AANA J. 2014 Jun;82(3):184-7.
6
The National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry.国家麻醉临床结果注册中心。
Anesth Analg. 2015 Dec;121(6):1604-10. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000895.
7
Diversity and Similarity of Anesthesia Procedures in the United States During and Among Regular Work Hours, Evenings, and Weekends.美国常规工作时间、夜间及周末期间麻醉程序的多样性与相似性
Anesth Analg. 2016 Dec;123(6):1567-1573. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001558.
8
Measuring Quality for Individual Anesthesia Clinicians.
Anesthesiol Clin. 2018 Jun;36(2):177-189. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
9
The Surgical Quality Alliance.外科质量联盟
Anesthesiology. 2012 Nov;117(5):929-30. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318259abbf.
10
Quality improvement using automated data sources: the anesthesia quality institute.利用自动化数据源进行质量改进:麻醉质量研究所。
Anesthesiol Clin. 2011 Sep;29(3):439-54. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2011.05.002. Epub 2011 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring and monitoring perioperative patient safety: a basic approach for clinicians.测量和监测围手术期患者安全:临床医生的基本方法。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Dec;33(6):815-822. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000930.