Williams Amanda J, Powers Jeremy M, Rhodes Jennifer L, Pozez Andrea L
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA.
Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Jul;81(1):106-112. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001485.
Pediatric dog bite injuries account for 1% of emergency department visits per year and represent an underrecognized and underreported public health problem. Reconstructive surgery is frequently utilized, and in the most extreme injuries, microvascular replantation may be considered. We sought to systematically review the available literature on microvascular replantation after facial dog bite injuries in children, with particular attention to perioperative morbidity and long-term follow-up.
We reviewed a case of microvascular replantation after a facial dog bite injury in a child from our own institution and conducted a systematic literature search to identify other similar reports. Clinical variables were collected from the reported cases, and descriptive statistics were calculated. A management algorithm was developed from the reviewed published experience.
We report the youngest child to date in the literature to undergo replantation after a facial dog bite injury. Nineteen other cases were found involving children aged 18 months to 17 years, with follow-up ranging from 2 weeks to 28 years. Anastomosis techniques varied considerably and included both an artery and vein in only 9 (47%) of 19 cases. Venous congestion was nearly universal, and multimodal techniques were used until native venous outflow was reestablished. Blood transfusion was common, but intensive care unit utilization was not frequently reported. Long-term outcomes were excellent, with growth of the replanted part and recovery of function; however, minor revision procedures were common.
Microvascular replantation following facial dog bite amputation injuries in the pediatric population is the ultimate step in the reconstructive ladder. Strong consideration should be given to microvascular exploration with involvement of large or whole segments of the lip, nose, or ear; however, parents should be counseled extensively regarding the known morbidity of replantation surgery. With meticulous surgical technique and careful postoperative care, replantation after facial dog bite amputation injuries may successfully achieve dramatic and lasting results for pediatric patients.
儿童犬咬伤占每年急诊科就诊病例的1%,是一个未得到充分认识和报告的公共卫生问题。重建手术经常被采用,在最严重的损伤中,可能会考虑进行微血管再植。我们试图系统回顾关于儿童面部犬咬伤后微血管再植的现有文献,特别关注围手术期发病率和长期随访情况。
我们回顾了本院一名儿童面部犬咬伤后微血管再植的病例,并进行了系统的文献检索以确定其他类似报告。从报告的病例中收集临床变量,并计算描述性统计数据。根据已发表的经验制定了一个管理算法。
我们报告了文献中迄今为止接受面部犬咬伤后再植手术的最年幼儿童。还发现了另外19例涉及18个月至17岁儿童的病例,随访时间从2周到28年不等。吻合技术差异很大,19例中只有9例(47%)同时吻合了动脉和静脉。静脉淤血几乎普遍存在,在恢复自身静脉回流之前采用了多种技术。输血很常见,但重症监护病房的使用情况报告较少。长期效果良好,再植部位生长且功能恢复;然而,小的修复手术很常见。
儿童面部犬咬伤截肢伤后的微血管再植是重建阶梯中的最终步骤。对于涉及嘴唇、鼻子或耳朵大部分或整个节段的损伤,应强烈考虑进行微血管探查;然而,应就再植手术已知的发病率向家长进行广泛咨询。通过细致的手术技术和精心的术后护理,面部犬咬伤截肢伤后的再植手术可能会成功地为儿科患者带来显著而持久的效果。