Horwitz Jacob, Machtei Eli E, Frankental Shai, Gabay Eran, Mayer Yaniv, Joseph Livia, Cohen Omer
1 Department of Periodontology, Rambam School of Graduate Dentistry, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
2 The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
J Oral Implantol. 2018 Oct;44(5):326-329. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-18-00005. Epub 2018 May 15.
The aim of this prospective cohort observational field trial was to examine 1-year survival and success rates of a recently introduced tapered implant system with switched platform conical abutments and to evaluate patient related outcomes of therapy. Partially edentulous patients aged between 18 and 75 years, with available bone height for dental implants ≥10 mm desiring to restore the missing tooth/teeth with implant supported restoration, were recruited by 7 periodontists in their respective private practices. Dental implants were installed according to standard implant therapy protocol. Three to 6 months postoperatively, after evaluating interim implant success, implants were restored by the referring dentists. Patient, Ramfjord teeth, and implant data, including baseline and 1-year postoperative, were collected. A total of 60 patients were recruited and received 117 implants. Complete 1-year clinical and radiographic data were available for 83 and 65 implants, respectively. Two implants failed during the first year, resulting in a 1-year survival rate of 98.3%. Mean implant probing pocket depth was 2.29 ± 0.84 mm. Mean radiographic bone distance from implant's shoulder at the mesial and distal sites at 1 year was 0.66 ± 0.5 and 0.79 ± 0.64mm, respectively, resulting in a success rate of 95.4%. Patient subjective evaluation of therapy exhibited a median pain experience of 1 and median esthetics, function, and general satisfaction evaluation of 10 on a scale of 1 to 10. The tapered conical connection dental implant system, used in private dental practices, shows good 1-year survival and success rates that are similar to other implant systems on the market.
这项前瞻性队列观察性现场试验的目的是研究一种最近推出的带有转换平台锥形基台的锥形种植体系统的1年生存率和成功率,并评估治疗的患者相关结局。18至75岁的部分牙列缺损患者,有≥10mm的可用种植体骨高度,希望通过种植体支持的修复来修复缺失牙,由7位牙周病医生在各自的私人诊所招募。根据标准种植治疗方案安装牙种植体。术后3至6个月,在评估临时种植体成功情况后,由转诊牙医进行种植体修复。收集患者、Ramfjord牙和种植体数据,包括基线和术后1年的数据。共招募了60名患者,植入了117颗种植体。分别有83颗和65颗种植体获得了完整的1年临床和影像学数据。在第一年中有两颗种植体失败,1年生存率为98.3%。种植体平均探诊袋深度为2.29±0.84mm。在1年时,种植体近中及远中位点距种植体肩部的平均影像学骨距离分别为0.66±0.5mm和0.79±0.64mm,成功率为95.4%。患者对治疗的主观评价显示,疼痛体验中位数为1,美学、功能和总体满意度评价中位数在1至10分的量表上为10分。在私人牙科诊所使用的锥形圆锥连接牙种植体系统显示出良好的1年生存率和成功率,与市场上的其他种植体系统相似。