Department of Emergency General Practice, Oslo Accident and Emergency Outpatient Clinic, Oslo, Norway.
Antibiotic Centre of Primary Care, Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
PLoS Med. 2018 May 15;15(5):e1002569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002569. eCollection 2018 May.
Although uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) are often self-limiting, most patients will be prescribed antibiotic treatment. We assessed whether treatment with ibuprofen was non-inferior to pivmecillinam in achieving symptomatic resolution by day 4, with a non-inferiority margin of 10%.
This was a randomized, controlled, double-blind non-inferiority trial. We recruited patients from 16 sites in a general practice setting in Norway, Sweden, and Denmark. Non-pregnant women aged 18-60 years presenting with symptoms of uncomplicated UTI were screened for eligibility from 11 April 2013 to 22 April 2016. Patients with informed consent were randomized (1:1 ratio) to treatment with either 600 mg ibuprofen or 200 mg pivmecillinam 3 times a day for 3 days. The patient, treating physician, and study personnel were blinded to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who felt cured by day 4, as assessed from a patient diary. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients in need of secondary treatment with antibiotics and cases of pyelonephritis. A total of 383 women were randomly assigned to treatment with either ibuprofen (n = 194, 181 analyzed) or pivmecillinam (n = 189, 178 analyzed). By day 4, 38.7% of the patients in the ibuprofen group felt cured versus 73.6% in the pivmecillinam group. The adjusted risk difference with 90% confidence interval was 35% (27% to 43%) in favor of pivmecillinam, which crossed the prespecified non-inferiority margin. Secondary endpoints were generally in favor of pivmecillinam. After 4 weeks' follow-up, 53% of patients in the ibuprofen group recovered without antibiotic treatment. Seven cases of pyelonephritis occurred, all in the ibuprofen group, giving a number needed to harm of 26 (95% CI 13 to 103). Five of these patients were hospitalized and classified as having serious adverse events; 2 recovered as outpatients. A limitation of the study was the extensive list of exclusion criteria, eliminating almost half of the patients screened. We did not register symptoms in the screening process; hence, we do not know the symptom burden for those who declined to participate. This might make our results less generalizable.
Ibuprofen was inferior to pivmecillinam for treating uncomplicated UTIs. More than half of the women in the ibuprofen group recovered without antibiotics. However, pyelonephritis occurred in 7 out of 181 women using ibuprofen. Until we can identify those women who will develop complications, we cannot recommend ibuprofen alone as initial treatment to women with uncomplicated UTIs.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01849926 EU Clinical Trials Register (EU-CTR), EudraCT Number 2012-002776-14.
尽管非复杂性尿路感染(UTI)通常是自限性的,但大多数患者仍会接受抗生素治疗。我们评估了布洛芬治疗在第 4 天达到症状缓解方面是否不劣于匹美西林,非劣效性边界为 10%。
这是一项随机、对照、双盲非劣效性试验。我们从挪威、瑞典和丹麦的 16 个普通实践地点招募了患者。2013 年 4 月 11 日至 2016 年 4 月 22 日,对出现非复杂性 UTI 症状的 18-60 岁非妊娠女性进行了筛查,以确定是否符合入选条件。有知情同意的患者按 1:1 比例随机(1:1 比例)接受 600mg 布洛芬或 200mg 匹美西林,每天 3 次,共 3 天。患者、治疗医生和研究人员对治疗分配均不知情。主要结局是根据患者日记评估第 4 天感觉治愈的患者比例。次要结局包括需要二次抗生素治疗的患者比例和肾盂肾炎病例。共有 383 名女性被随机分配至布洛芬组(n=194,181 例分析)或匹美西林组(n=189,178 例分析)。第 4 天,布洛芬组中 38.7%的患者感觉治愈,而匹美西林组中 73.6%的患者感觉治愈。调整后的风险差异及 90%置信区间为 35%(27%至 43%),有利于匹美西林,超出了预设的非劣效性边界。次要结局总体上有利于匹美西林。4 周随访后,布洛芬组 53%的患者无需抗生素治疗即可康复。7 例肾盂肾炎发生,均在布洛芬组,导致需要治疗的人数为 26(95%CI 13 至 103)。其中 5 例患者住院,被归类为严重不良事件;2 例在门诊康复。该研究的一个局限性是排除标准广泛,排除了近一半的筛查患者。我们在筛查过程中没有登记症状;因此,我们不知道那些拒绝参与的患者的症状负担。这可能使我们的结果不太具有普遍性。
布洛芬治疗非复杂性 UTIs 不如匹美西林。布洛芬组超过一半的女性无需抗生素即可康复。然而,在使用布洛芬的 181 名女性中,有 7 名发生肾盂肾炎。在我们能够确定哪些女性会发生并发症之前,我们不能推荐布洛芬单独作为女性非复杂性 UTIs 的初始治疗。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01849926 欧盟临床试验注册(EU-CTR),EudraCT 编号 2012-002776-14。