Suppr超能文献

在一线激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性转移性乳腺癌中,无进展生存期是否比总生存期更具相关性的终点指标?

Is progression-free survival a more relevant endpoint than overall survival in first-line HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer?

作者信息

Forsythe Anna, Chandiwana David, Barth Janina, Thabane Marroon, Baeck Johan, Shor Anastasiya, Tremblay Gabriel

机构信息

Health Technology Assessment Evidence, Purple Squirrel Economics, New York, NY, USA.

Global Value and Access, Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Manag Res. 2018 May 4;10:1015-1025. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S162714. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), metastatic breast cancer (MBC) accounts for 73% of all MBCs. Endocrine therapy (ET) is the basis of first-line (1L) therapy for patients with HR+/HER2- MBC. Novel therapies have demonstrated improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) compared to ET. The clinical relevance of PFS is being debated, as there is no proven direct correlation with overall survival (OS) benefit to date. We reviewed studies of HR+/HER2- MBC to assess PFS and other factors that influence OS and treatment response, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

METHODS

The Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched to identify studies in adult women with HR+/HER2- MBC, published between January 2006 and January 2017, and written in English. Phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational, and retrospective studies were included.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine RCTs were identified: 58 (73%) in the 1L+ setting and 21 (27%) in second-line or greater settings. PFS hazard ratios (HRs) were reported in 61 (77%) studies; 31 (39%) reported significant PFS improvements. OS was reported in 44 (41%) studies; 12 (15%) reported significant OS improvements. Significant improvements in both PFS and OS were reported in only 6 (8%) studies (1 Phase II; 5 Phase III). Patients with HER2- MBC received, on average, ≥5 lines of therapy, with no consistent treatment pathway. Baseline characteristics, prior therapies, and the type and number of post-progression therapies significantly impacted OS. PFS, response rates, and HRQoL decreased with each line of therapy (EuroQol 5 Dimensions: 0.78 1L vs. 0.70 post-progression).

CONCLUSION

Few RCTs in HR+/HER2- MBC have demonstrated significant improvements in OS. Factors other than choice of 1L therapy impact OS, including post-progression therapies, which cannot be controlled in RCTs. This study emphasizes the importance of PFS improvement in 1L treatment of HR+/HER2- MBC.

摘要

背景

激素受体阳性(HR+)、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HER2-)的转移性乳腺癌(MBC)占所有MBC的73%。内分泌治疗(ET)是HR+/HER2-MBC患者一线(1L)治疗的基础。与ET相比,新型疗法已显示出无进展生存期(PFS)有所改善。PFS的临床相关性仍存在争议,因为迄今为止尚无证据表明其与总生存期(OS)获益存在直接关联。我们回顾了HR+/HER2-MBC的研究,以评估PFS以及其他影响OS、治疗反应和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的因素。

方法

系统检索Embase、Medline和Cochrane数据库,以识别2006年1月至2017年1月期间发表的、以英文撰写的关于HR+/HER2-MBC成年女性的研究。纳入了II期和III期随机对照试验(RCT)、观察性研究和回顾性研究。

结果

共识别出79项RCT:58项(73%)处于1L及以上治疗阶段,21项(27%)处于二线或更高级治疗阶段。61项(77%)研究报告了PFS风险比(HR);31项(39%)报告PFS有显著改善。44项(41%)研究报告了OS;12项(15%)报告OS有显著改善。仅6项(8%)研究(1项II期;5项III期)报告PFS和OS均有显著改善。HER2-MBC患者平均接受≥5线治疗,且没有一致的治疗路径。基线特征、既往治疗以及进展后治疗的类型和数量显著影响OS。随着每一线治疗,PFS、缓解率和HRQoL均下降(欧洲五维健康量表:1L时为0.78,进展后为0.70)。

结论

HR+/HER2-MBC的RCT中很少有研究显示OS有显著改善。除了1L治疗的选择外,其他因素也会影响OS,包括进展后治疗,而这些在RCT中无法得到控制。本研究强调了在HR+/HER2-MBC的1L治疗中改善PFS的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0af/5942396/1003a750926c/cmar-10-1015Fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验