Forsythe Anna, Chandiwana David, Barth Janina, Thabane Marroon, Baeck Johan, Tremblay Gabriel
Purple Squirrel Economics, New York, NY.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2018 May 4;10:69-78. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S162841. eCollection 2018.
Several recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS); however, few have reported improvement in overall survival (OS). The surrogacy of PFS or time to progression (TTP) for OS has not been formally investigated in HR+, HER2- MBC.
A systematic literature review of RCTs in HR+, HER2- MBC was conducted to identify studies that reported both median PFS/TTP and OS. The correlation between PFS/TTP and OS was evaluated using Pearson's product-moment correlation and Spearman's rank correlation. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore possible reasons for heterogeneity. Errors-in-variables weighted least squares regression (LSR) was used to model incremental OS months as a function of incremental PFS/TTP months. An exploratory analysis investigated the impact of three covariates (chemotherapy vs hormonal/targeted therapy, PFS vs TTP, and first-line therapy vs second-line therapy or greater) on OS prediction. The lower 95% prediction band was used to determine the minimum incremental PFS/TTP months required to predict OS benefit (surrogate threshold effect [STE]).
Forty studies were identified. There was a statistically significant correlation between median PFS/TTP and OS (Pearson =0.741, =0.000; Spearman =0.650, =0.000). These results proved consistent for chemotherapy and hormonal/targeted therapy. Univariate LSR analysis yielded an of 0.354 with 1 incremental PFS/TTP month corresponding to 1.13 incremental OS months. Controlling the type of treatment (chemotherapy vs hormonal/targeted therapy), line of therapy (first vs subsequent), and progression measure (PFS vs TTP) led to an improved of 0.569 with 1 PFS/TTP month corresponding to 0.78 OS months. The STE for OS benefit was 5-6 months of incremental PFS/TTP.
We demonstrated a significant association between PFS/TTP and OS, which may justify the use of PFS/TTP as a surrogate for OS benefit in HR+, HER2- MBC.
最近几项针对激素受体阳性(HR+)、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HER2-)转移性乳腺癌(MBC)的随机对照试验(RCT)显示无进展生存期(PFS)有显著改善;然而,很少有研究报告总生存期(OS)得到改善。在HR+、HER2- MBC中,PFS或至疾病进展时间(TTP)对OS的替代作用尚未得到正式研究。
对HR+、HER2- MBC的RCT进行系统文献综述,以确定报告了中位PFS/TTP和OS的研究。使用Pearson积矩相关和Spearman秩相关评估PFS/TTP与OS之间的相关性。进行亚组分析以探讨异质性的可能原因。使用变量误差加权最小二乘回归(LSR)将OS增加月数建模为PFS/TTP增加月数的函数。一项探索性分析研究了三个协变量(化疗与激素/靶向治疗、PFS与TTP、一线治疗与二线或更高级别治疗)对OS预测的影响。使用较低的95%预测区间来确定预测OS获益所需的最小PFS/TTP增加月数(替代阈值效应[STE])。
共确定了40项研究。中位PFS/TTP与OS之间存在统计学显著相关性(Pearson =0.741,P =0.000;Spearman =0.650,P =0.000)。这些结果在化疗和激素/靶向治疗中均一致。单变量LSR分析得出的β值为0.354,PFS/TTP每增加1个月对应OS增加1.13个月。控制治疗类型(化疗与激素/靶向治疗)、治疗线数(一线与后续)和进展测量指标(PFS与TTP)后,β值提高到0.569,PFS/TTP每增加1个月对应OS增加0.78个月。OS获益的STE为PFS/TTP增加5至6个月。
我们证明了PFS/TTP与OS之间存在显著关联,这可能证明在HR+、HER2- MBC中使用PFS/TTP作为OS获益的替代指标是合理的。