• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[C类人格障碍的时代:最新进展]

[Time for cluster C personality disorders: state of the art].

作者信息

Hutsebaut J, Willemsen E M C, Van H L

出版信息

Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2018;60(5):306-314.

PMID:29766478
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Compared to cluster B personality disorders, the assessment and treatment of people with obsessive-compulsive, dependent, and avoidant personality disorders (cluster C) is given little attention in the field of research and clinical practice.

AIM

Presenting the current state of affairs in regard to cluster C personality disorders.

METHOD

A systematic literature search was conducted using the main data bases.

RESULTS

Cluster C personality disorders are present in approximately 3-9% of the general population. In about half of the cases of mood, anxiety, and eating disorders, there is co-morbid cluster C pathology. This has a major influence on the progression of symptoms, treatment effectiveness and potential relapse. There are barely any well conducted randomized studies on the treatment of cluster-C in existence. Open cohort studies, however, show strong, lasting treatment effects.

CONCLUSION

Given the frequent occurrence of cluster C personality disorders, the burden of disease, associated societal costs and the prognostic implications in case of a co-morbid cluster C personality disorder, early detection and treatment of these disorders is warranted.

摘要

背景

与B类人格障碍相比,强迫型、依赖型和回避型人格障碍(C类)患者的评估与治疗在研究和临床实践领域很少受到关注。

目的

介绍C类人格障碍的当前状况。

方法

使用主要数据库进行系统的文献检索。

结果

C类人格障碍在普通人群中的患病率约为3%-9%。在大约一半的情绪、焦虑和饮食失调病例中,存在共病的C类病理情况。这对症状进展、治疗效果和潜在复发有重大影响。几乎没有关于C类人格障碍治疗的高质量随机研究。然而,开放性队列研究显示出强大且持久的治疗效果。

结论

鉴于C类人格障碍的频繁发生、疾病负担、相关社会成本以及共病C类人格障碍时的预后影响,对这些障碍进行早期检测和治疗是必要的。

相似文献

1
[Time for cluster C personality disorders: state of the art].[C类人格障碍的时代:最新进展]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2018;60(5):306-314.
2
[Personality disorders in a nonclinical sample of adolescents].[青少年非临床样本中的人格障碍]
Encephale. 2002 Nov-Dec;28(6 Pt 1):520-4.
3
Influence of co-morbid generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder and personality disorders on the outcome of cognitive behavioural treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder.共病广泛性焦虑障碍、惊恐障碍和人格障碍对强迫症认知行为治疗结果的影响。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2007;36(3):145-55. doi: 10.1080/16506070701259374.
4
Bipolar obsessive-compulsive disorder and personality disorders.双相情感障碍伴强迫障碍及人格障碍。
Bipolar Disord. 2007 Nov;9(7):722-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00508.x.
5
Personality disorders and anxiety disorders: what is the relationship?人格障碍与焦虑障碍:两者有何关联?
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;27(1):57-61. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000025.
6
The prevalence, age distribution and comorbidity of personality disorders in Australian women.澳大利亚女性人格障碍的患病率、年龄分布及共病情况。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;51(2):141-150. doi: 10.1177/0004867416649032. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
7
Homicidal behaviour among people with avoidant, dependent and obsessive-compulsive (cluster C) personality disorder.回避型、依赖型和强迫型(C类)人格障碍患者中的杀人行为。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2013 Feb;23(1):18-29. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1844. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
8
Personality disorders in obsessive compulsive disorder.强迫症中的人格障碍
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1992 Dec;15(4):803-12.
9
Disentangling depressive personality disorder from avoidant, borderline, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders.区分抑郁型人格障碍与回避型、边缘型和强迫型人格障碍。
Compr Psychiatry. 2006 Jul-Aug;47(4):298-306. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2005.09.002. Epub 2006 Apr 19.
10
Comorbidity of axis I and axis II disorders.轴I与轴II障碍的共病情况。
Am J Psychiatry. 1995 Apr;152(4):571-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.152.4.571.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationship Between Early Maladaptive Schemas and Cluster C Personality Disorder Traits: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.早期适应不良模式与聚类 C 型人格障碍特征之间的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2023 Oct;25(10):439-453. doi: 10.1007/s11920-023-01439-3. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
2
Combined group and individual therapy for patients with avoidant personality disorder-A pilot study.针对回避型人格障碍患者的联合团体与个体治疗——一项初步研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 4;14:1181686. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1181686. eCollection 2023.
3
G-FORCE: the effectiveness of group psychotherapy for Cluster-C personality disorders: protocol of a pragmatic RCT comparing psychodynamic and two forms of schema group therapy.
G-FORCE:团体心理治疗对 Cluster-C 型人格障碍的效果:一项实用 RCT 的方案,比较精神分析和两种形式的图式团体治疗。
Trials. 2023 Apr 29;24(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07309-w.
4
Individual psychotherapy for cluster-C personality disorders: protocol of a pragmatic RCT comparing short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy, affect phobia therapy and schema therapy (I-FORCE).针对聚类 C 型人格障碍的个体心理治疗:一项实用 RCT 比较短期精神动力支持性心理治疗、情感恐惧症治疗和图式治疗(I-FORCE)的方案。
Trials. 2023 Apr 5;24(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07136-z.
5
Design of an RCT on cost-effectiveness of group schema therapy versus individual schema therapy for patients with Cluster-C personality disorder: the QUEST-CLC study protocol.一项关于团体图式治疗与个体图式治疗对 Cluster-C 型人格障碍患者成本效益的 RCT 设计:QUEST-CLC 研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 8;22(1):637. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04248-9.
6
Cluster B versus Cluster C Personality Disorders: A Comparison of Comorbidity, Suicidality, Traumatization and Global Functioning.B 类人格障碍与 C 类人格障碍的比较:共病、自杀倾向、创伤经历及整体功能的对比
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Apr 12;12(4):105. doi: 10.3390/bs12040105.
7
Neural correlates of treatment effect and prediction of treatment outcome in patients with PTSD and comorbid personality disorder: study design.创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)合并人格障碍患者治疗效果的神经关联及治疗结果预测:研究设计
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2021 May 5;8(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40479-021-00156-8.
8
Dance Movement Therapy for Clients With a Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.针对人格障碍患者的舞蹈动作治疗:一项系统评价与主题综合分析
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 18;12:581578. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.581578. eCollection 2021.