Song Jingyuan, Li Hongxia, Wang Yuli, Liu Ping, Li Xueying, Tang Chaoshu, Jin Hongfang, Du Junbao
Department of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China.
Department of Medical Statistics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2018 Oct;39(7):1366-1372. doi: 10.1007/s00246-018-1904-x. Epub 2018 May 16.
The objective of this manuscript was to explore if left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS) could predict the efficacy of metoprolol therapy on vasovagal syncope (VVS) in children. Forty-nine children, including 30 with VVS and 19 gender- and age-matched healthy controls, were included in the study. Metoprolol was prescribed to the VVS subjects. The clinical data were obtained during follow-up at 2 and 6 months. The results showed that LVEF and LVFS of responders were significantly higher than those of non-responders both at the 2-month follow-up (LVEF: 72.5 ± 3.2% vs. 64.6 ± 3.4%; LVFS: 40.9 ± 2.3% vs. 34.9 ± 2.9%), and at the 6-month follow-up (LVEF: 72.8 ± 2.8% vs. 65.5 ± 4.6%; LVFS: 41.1 ± 1.9% vs. 35.8 ± 3.6%). The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis demonstrated that 70.5% as a cutoff value of baseline LVEF yielded a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 100% in predicting the therapeutic effectiveness of metoprolol at 2 months. For baseline LVFS, 38.5% as a cutoff value yielded a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 90%. At the 6-month follow-up, the ROC analysis demonstrated that 70.5% as a cutoff value of baseline LVEF yielded a sensitivity of 81.3% and a specificity of 88.9% in the prediction of metoprolol efficacy. For baseline LVFS, 37.5% as a cutoff value yielded a sensitivity of 93.8% and a specificity of 66.7%. In conclusion, baseline LVEF and LVFS might be useful predictors of the efficacy of β-blocker therapy on VVS in children.
本手稿的目的是探讨左心室射血分数(LVEF)和左心室缩短分数(LVFS)是否能够预测美托洛尔治疗儿童血管迷走性晕厥(VVS)的疗效。该研究纳入了49名儿童,其中包括30名VVS患儿以及19名性别和年龄匹配的健康对照。对VVS受试者开具了美托洛尔处方。临床数据在随访2个月和6个月时获取。结果显示,在2个月随访时,有反应者的LVEF和LVFS均显著高于无反应者(LVEF:72.5±3.2%对64.6±3.4%;LVFS:40.9±2.3%对34.9±2.9%),在6个月随访时亦是如此(LVEF:72.8±2.8%对65.5±4.6%;LVFS:41.1±1.9%对35.8±3.6%)。受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析表明,以70.5%作为基线LVEF的临界值,在预测美托洛尔2个月时的治疗效果方面,灵敏度为80%,特异度为100%。对于基线LVFS,以38.5%作为临界值时,灵敏度为90%,特异度为90%。在6个月随访时,ROC分析表明,以70.5%作为基线LVEF的临界值,在预测美托洛尔疗效方面,灵敏度为81.3%,特异度为88.9%。对于基线LVFS,以37.5%作为临界值时,灵敏度为93.8%,特异度为66.7%。总之,基线LVEF和LVFS可能是β受体阻滞剂治疗儿童VVS疗效的有用预测指标。