Manrique Oscar J, Bishop Sarah N, Ciudad Pedro, Adabi Kian, Martinez-Jorge Jorys, Moran Steven L, Huang Tony, Vijayasekaran Aparna, Chen Shih-Heng, Chen Hung-Chi
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018 Sep;34(7):522-529. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641712. Epub 2018 May 16.
Lower extremity salvage following significant soft tissue loss can be complicated by lack of recipient vessel for free tissue transfer. We describe our experience in lower limb salvage for patients with no recipient vessels with the use of pedicle, free and cable bridge flaps.
A retrospective review from 1985 to 2017 of patients undergoing lower limb salvage using a contralateral pedicle cross leg (PCL) flaps, free cross leg (FCL) flaps, or free cable bridge (FCB) flaps was conducted. Demographics, etiology of the reconstruction, type of flap used, donor-site vessels, defect size, operating time, time of pedicle division, length of hospital stay, time to ambulation, and complications were analyzed.
A total of 53 patients (48 males and 5 females) with an average age of 35 years (range, 29-38 years) were identified. The etiology for the reconstruction was trauma in 52 patients and oncological resection in 1 patient. There were 18 PCL, 25 FCL, and 10 FCB completed. The recipient vessels for all flaps were the posterior tibial artery and vein. The average operating room times for PCL, FCL, and FCB flaps were 4, 9, and 10 hours, respectively. The average length of hospital stay was 5 weeks and average time to ambulation was 4 weeks. The average follow-up time was 7.5 years (range, 3-12 years). Complications encountered were hematoma (six), prolonged pain (six), total flap loss (two), reoperation (five), and infection (four). Limb salvage rates were 96.2%.
When ipsilateral limb vessels are not available, and other reconstructive options have been exhausted, cross leg flaps can be a viable option for limb salvage in the setting of extensive defects.
严重软组织缺损后的下肢挽救可能因缺乏用于游离组织移植的受区血管而变得复杂。我们描述了在没有受区血管的患者中使用带蒂、游离和桥式皮瓣进行下肢挽救的经验。
对1985年至2017年期间接受对侧带蒂交叉腿(PCL)皮瓣、游离交叉腿(FCL)皮瓣或游离桥式(FCB)皮瓣进行下肢挽救的患者进行回顾性研究。分析了人口统计学、重建病因、所用皮瓣类型、供区血管、缺损大小、手术时间、蒂切断时间、住院时间、行走时间和并发症。
共确定53例患者(48例男性和5例女性),平均年龄35岁(范围29 - 38岁)。重建病因是52例创伤和1例肿瘤切除。完成了18例PCL、25例FCL和10例FCB。所有皮瓣的受区血管均为胫后动脉和静脉。PCL、FCL和FCB皮瓣的平均手术时间分别为4、9和10小时。平均住院时间为5周,平均行走时间为4周。平均随访时间为7.5年(范围3 - 12年)。遇到的并发症有血肿(6例)、疼痛持续时间延长(6例)、皮瓣完全坏死(2例)、再次手术(5例)和感染(4例)。肢体挽救率为96.2%。
当同侧肢体血管不可用时,且其他重建选择已用尽,交叉腿皮瓣可作为广泛缺损情况下肢体挽救的可行选择。