• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“明智选择加拿大”与抗菌药物管理:共同致力于减少不必要的医疗护理

"Choosing Wisely Canada" and antimicrobial stewardship: A shared focus on reducing unnecessary care.

作者信息

Born K B, Leis J A, Gold W L, Levinson W

机构信息

Choosing Wisely Canada, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.

Division of Infectious Diseases and Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.

出版信息

Can Commun Dis Rep. 2015 Jun 18;41(Suppl 4):9-13. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v41is4a03.

DOI:10.14745/ccdr.v41is4a03
PMID:29769967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5868711/
Abstract

There is a growing movement in medicine which recognizes that some tests, treatments or procedures do not add value for patients, and may even cause harm. The "Choosing Wisely Canada" campaign is a grassroots, physician-led campaign to engage physicians and patients in conversations about overuse of unnecessary tests, treatments and procedures to improve the quality of health care. This article reviews the underlying principles of this campaign and its spread across Canada. It also highlights the alignment between the principles of Choosing Wisely Canada with those of antimicrobial stewardship, which share similar motivations, challenges and opportunities.

摘要

医学领域正兴起一场运动,该运动认识到某些检查、治疗或程序对患者并无益处,甚至可能造成伤害。“明智选择加拿大”运动是一项由基层发起、医生主导的活动,旨在促使医生和患者就过度使用不必要的检查、治疗和程序展开对话,以提高医疗保健质量。本文回顾了该运动的基本原则及其在加拿大的推广情况。它还强调了“明智选择加拿大”的原则与抗菌药物管理原则之间的一致性,二者有着相似的动机、挑战和机遇。

相似文献

1
"Choosing Wisely Canada" and antimicrobial stewardship: A shared focus on reducing unnecessary care.“明智选择加拿大”与抗菌药物管理:共同致力于减少不必要的医疗护理
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2015 Jun 18;41(Suppl 4):9-13. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v41is4a03.
2
'Choosing Wisely': a growing international campaign.“明智选择”:一项日益发展的国际运动。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Feb;24(2):167-74. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003821. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
3
Physician perspectives on Choosing Wisely Canada as an approach to reduce unnecessary medical care: a qualitative study.医生对选择明智加拿大作为减少不必要医疗的方法的看法:一项定性研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Sep 26;16(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0370-5.
4
Learners as Leaders: A Global Groundswell of Students Leading Choosing Wisely Initiatives in Medical Education.学习者作为领导者:全球范围内学生引领医学教育明智选择倡议的浪潮。
Acad Med. 2019 Nov;94(11):1699-1703. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002868.
5
Choosing Wisely Canada-Top Five List in Hepatology: Official Position Statement of the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver (CASL) and Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC).明智选择加拿大肝病学前五名单:加拿大肝脏研究协会 (CASL) 和明智选择加拿大 (CWC) 的官方立场声明。
Ann Hepatol. 2019 Jan-Feb;18(1):165-171. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.7908.
6
Top POEMs of 2015 Consistent with the Principles of the Choosing Wisely Campaign.2015年符合明智选择运动原则的顶级临床实践要点
Am Fam Physician. 2016 Oct 1;94(7):566-570.
7
Choosing Wisely internationally - helpful recommendations for antimicrobial stewardship!国际明智选择——抗菌药物管理的有益建议!
Infection. 2023 Jun;51(3):567-581. doi: 10.1007/s15010-023-02005-y. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
8
Do choosing wisely tools meet criteria for patient decision aids? A descriptive analysis of patient materials.明智选择工具是否符合患者决策辅助工具的标准?对患者资料的描述性分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 26;6(8):e011918. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011918.
9
A survey of primary care patients' readiness to engage in the de-adoption practices recommended by Choosing Wisely Canada.一项关于初级保健患者参与加拿大明智选择运动所推荐的弃用医疗行为的意愿的调查。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Jun 10;9:301. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2103-6.
10
Engaging physicians and consumers in conversations about treatment overuse and waste: a short history of the choosing wisely campaign.让医生和消费者参与有关过度治疗和浪费的对话:明智选择运动的简短历史。
Acad Med. 2014 Jul;89(7):990-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000270.

引用本文的文献

1
Throat infections and use of streptococcal antigen test and antibiotic treatment in general practice; a web-based survey.喉感染以及在一般实践中使用链球菌抗原检测和抗生素治疗:一项基于网络的调查。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Dec;40(4):466-473. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2144982. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
2
Global resilience and new strategies needed for antimicrobial stewardship during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.在新冠疫情期间及之后,抗菌药物管理需要全球韧性和新策略。
J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2022 Jul;5(7):707-715. doi: 10.1002/jac5.1622. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
3
Appropriateness of Outpatient Antibiotic Use in Seniors across Two Canadian Provinces.加拿大两个省份老年人门诊抗生素使用的合理性
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Dec 3;10(12):1484. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10121484.
4
The importance of stewardship.管理的重要性。
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2015 Jun 18;41(Suppl 4):3-4. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v41is4a01.
5
A decade of outpatient antimicrobial use in older adults in Ontario: a descriptive study.安大略省老年人门诊抗菌药物使用十年:一项描述性研究。
CMAJ Open. 2017 Dec 21;5(4):E878-E885. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20170100.

本文引用的文献

1
Antimicrobial stewardship in outpatient settings: a systematic review.门诊环境中的抗菌药物管理:一项系统综述
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;36(2):142-52. doi: 10.1017/ice.2014.41.
2
'Choosing Wisely': a growing international campaign.“明智选择”:一项日益发展的国际运动。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Feb;24(2):167-74. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003821. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
3
Understanding the determinants of antimicrobial prescribing within hospitals: the role of "prescribing etiquette".了解医院内抗菌药物处方的决定因素:“处方礼仪”的作用。
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Jul;57(2):188-96. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit212. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
4
Overuse of magnetic resonance imaging.磁共振成像的过度使用。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 13;173(9):823-5. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3804.
5
Evaluation of postprescription review and feedback as a method of promoting rational antimicrobial use: a multicenter intervention.评价处方审核与反馈作为促进合理使用抗菌药物的方法:一项多中心干预研究。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Apr;33(4):374-80. doi: 10.1086/664771.
6
Audit and feedback to reduce broad-spectrum antibiotic use among intensive care unit patients: a controlled interrupted time series analysis.审核和反馈以减少重症监护病房患者广谱抗生素的使用:一项对照性中断时间序列分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Apr;33(4):354-61. doi: 10.1086/664757.
7
Antibiotic stewardship: overcoming implementation barriers.抗生素管理:克服实施障碍。
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011 Aug;24(4):357-62. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3283483262.
8
Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.美国感染病学会/美国胸科学会关于成人社区获得性肺炎管理的共识指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 1;44 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S27-72. doi: 10.1086/511159.
9
Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship.美国传染病学会和美国医疗保健流行病学学会关于制定机构计划以加强抗菌药物管理的指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Jan 15;44(2):159-77. doi: 10.1086/510393. Epub 2006 Dec 13.
10
The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada.加拿大不良事件研究:加拿大医院患者中不良事件的发生率。
CMAJ. 2004 May 25;170(11):1678-86. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040498.