a The Pennsylvania State University , University Park , PA , USA.
Augment Altern Commun. 2018 Sep;34(3):206-218. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2018.1470668. Epub 2018 May 18.
The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the effects of instruction on single-word reading of individuals who use aided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). A systematic search identified nine single-case experimental design studies that involved 24 individuals who used aided AAC. Overall, the evidence indicated that instruction had positive effects on reading at the single-word level for individuals across ages and diagnostic categories (i.e., autism spectrum disorder (ASD), cerebral palsy (CP), Down syndrome, and intellectual disability). The studies revealed that these effects were consistent across a range of participant, intervention, and outcome measure characteristics. Phonological approaches, sight-word approaches, and a combination of these two approaches yielded very large effects. Despite the large effects, the findings must be viewed with caution due to limitations in the number of studies and participants and limitations in the reporting of detailed participant and intervention characteristics across the studies. In order to determine which interventions are most effective for which individuals, future research directions are discussed, including the need for greater specificity in describing participant and intervention characteristics, investigations into how to best measure intervention outcomes without requiring spoken responses, and investigations into longer-term interventions targeting a wider range of reading skills.
本系统评价旨在研究指导对使用辅助性增强和替代性沟通(AAC)的个体的单字阅读的影响。系统检索确定了九项涉及 24 名使用辅助性 AAC 的个体的单病例实验设计研究。总体而言,证据表明,对于不同年龄和诊断类别的个体(即自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)、脑瘫(CP)、唐氏综合征和智力残疾),指导对单字阅读具有积极影响。研究表明,这些影响在一系列参与者、干预措施和结果测量特征中是一致的。语音方法、视觉词方法以及这两种方法的结合产生了非常大的效果。尽管效果很大,但由于研究数量和参与者的限制以及研究之间详细参与者和干预特征报告的限制,必须谨慎看待这些发现。为了确定哪些干预措施对哪些个体最有效,讨论了未来的研究方向,包括需要更具体地描述参与者和干预特征,研究如何在不要求口语反应的情况下最好地衡量干预效果,以及研究针对更广泛阅读技能的长期干预措施。