• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

焦虑障碍的文献发表是否还在持续增长?看看 Boschen(2008)的预测和之后的情况。

Are anxiety disorders publications continuing on a trajectory of growth? A look at Boschen's (2008) predictions and beyond.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, S4S 0A2, Canada.

Department of Psychology, Duquesne University, USA.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2018 May;56:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.05.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.05.003
PMID:29773244
Abstract

The relative health of a field of research can be approximated by assessing peer-reviewed journal publication trends for articles pertinent to that field. The most recent comprehensive assessment of publication trends in the anxiety disorders indicated that the field was on a continuing trajectory of growth (Boschen, 2008). We conducted an updated search of Medline for publications on each of the anxiety disorders from 2006 to 2016. Results indicated that there was continuing growth in anxiety disorders research overall and, particularly, for posttraumatic stress disorder, social anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and obsessive compulsive disorder. Publication trends observed in Medline were also reflected in the focus of papers published in the Journal of Anxiety Disorders over the past 3 years; yet, a substantive number of papers in the journal also dealt with multiple anxiety disorders, anxiety-related constructs, transdiagnostic issues, and conditions with significant overlap with the anxiety disorders. Observed publication trends, shifts in the focus of research attention, and probable future research directions are discussed briefly.

摘要

研究领域的相对健康状况可以通过评估与该领域相关的同行评审期刊文章的发表趋势来近似评估。最近对焦虑障碍发表趋势的全面评估表明,该领域正在继续发展(Boschen,2008)。我们对 2006 年至 2016 年期间每种焦虑障碍的 Medline 出版物进行了更新搜索。结果表明,焦虑障碍研究总体上仍在继续增长,特别是创伤后应激障碍、社交焦虑障碍、广泛性焦虑障碍和强迫症。在 Medline 中观察到的发表趋势也反映在过去 3 年《焦虑障碍杂志》上发表的论文的重点上;然而,该杂志的大量论文也涉及多种焦虑障碍、与焦虑相关的结构、跨诊断问题以及与焦虑障碍有显著重叠的病症。简要讨论了观察到的发表趋势、研究重点的转变以及可能的未来研究方向。

相似文献

1
Are anxiety disorders publications continuing on a trajectory of growth? A look at Boschen's (2008) predictions and beyond.焦虑障碍的文献发表是否还在持续增长?看看 Boschen(2008)的预测和之后的情况。
J Anxiety Disord. 2018 May;56:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.05.003.
2
Publication trends in individual anxiety disorders: 1980-2015.1980 - 2015年个体焦虑症的发表趋势。
J Anxiety Disord. 2008;22(3):570-5. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.04.004. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
3
Generalized anxiety disorder publications: where do we stand a decade later?广泛性焦虑障碍文献:十年后我们处于什么位置?
J Anxiety Disord. 2010 Oct;24(7):780-4. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.05.012. Epub 2010 May 25.
4
Generalized anxiety disorder publications: so where do we stand?广泛性焦虑症相关出版物:那么我们目前的情况如何?
J Anxiety Disord. 2000 Jan-Feb;14(1):31-40. doi: 10.1016/s0887-6185(99)00034-1.
5
Publication trends in addiction research.成瘾研究的发表趋势。
Addict Biol. 2011 Oct;16(4):532-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2011.00388.x.
6
Growth of the literature on the topic of personality disorders.关于人格障碍主题的文献增长情况。
Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Mar;157(3):472-3. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.3.472.
7
Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) research: A bibliometric analysis of publication trends over the first 20 years.不良童年经历(ACEs)研究:首个 20 年文献发表趋势的文献计量分析。
Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Feb;112:104895. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104895. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
8
Twenty-five Years of Research on Childhood Anxiety Disorders: Publication Trends Between 1982 and 2006 and a Selective Review of the Literature.儿童焦虑症25年研究:1982年至2006年的出版趋势及文献综述
J Child Fam Stud. 2009 Aug;18(4):388-395. doi: 10.1007/s10826-008-9242-x. Epub 2008 Nov 28.
9
Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.期刊中热门话题的影响因素及预测
Ultraschall Med. 2016 Aug;37(4):343-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-111209. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
10
Characteristics and trends in peer-reviewed publications in the field of psychosomatic medicine.心身医学领域同行评审出版物的特征与趋势
Psychosomatics. 2014 Sep-Oct;55(5):450-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of decision rules for an adaptive aftercare intervention based on individual symptom courses for agoraphobia patients.基于惊恐障碍患者个体症状进程开发适应性后续干预决策规则。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 6;14(1):3056. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52803-z.
2
Current prevalence and determinants of generalized anxiety disorder from a nationally representative, population-based survey of India.基于印度全国代表性人口调查的广泛性焦虑症的当前患病率及决定因素
Indian J Psychiatry. 2023 Dec;65(12):1244-1248. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_824_23. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
3
Invisible Hands and Fine Calipers: A Call to Use Formal Theory as a Toolkit for Theory Construction.
无形之手与精密卡尺:呼吁将形式理论作为理论构建的工具包。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Jul;16(4):725-743. doi: 10.1177/1745691620974697. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
4
Mental health disorders research in Europe, 2001-2018.2001-2018 年欧洲精神障碍研究。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2020 Feb;23(1):15-20. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300130.
5
The efficacy and safety of 'antianxiety granule' for anxiety disorder: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial.“安神颗粒”治疗焦虑症的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行分组试验。
Trials. 2020 Jan 23;21(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4057-1.
6
A comparison of DSM-5 and DSM-IV agoraphobia in the World Mental Health Surveys.DSM-5 与 DSM-IV 广泛性焦虑障碍的比较。
Depress Anxiety. 2019 Jun;36(6):499-510. doi: 10.1002/da.22885. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
7
The increase in interest in GAD: Commentary on Asmundson & Asmundson.对广泛性焦虑障碍关注度的增加:阿斯蒙德森与阿斯蒙德森的评论。
J Anxiety Disord. 2018 May;56:11-13. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.04.006.