• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于人格障碍主题的文献增长情况。

Growth of the literature on the topic of personality disorders.

作者信息

Blashfield R K, Intoccia V

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Auburn University, AL 36849, USA.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Mar;157(3):472-3. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.3.472.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.3.472
PMID:10698831
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors assessed the growth of the literature on the topic of personality disorders before and after publication of DSM-III.

METHOD

A MEDLINE search was conducted for journal articles concerning the personality disorders that were published from 1966 to 1995.

RESULTS

Contrary to the authors' prediction, the growth of this literature was slower after the publication of DSM-III in 1980 than it was before that date. Other areas of psychopathology, such as Alzheimer's disease and posttraumatic stress disorder, have literatures whose growth rates since 1980 have exceeded their growth rates before publication of DSM-III.

CONCLUSIONS

Over one-half of the individual personality disorders (e.g., histrionic and passive-aggressive) have either very small literatures or literatures with negative growth rates. Only three personality disorders (i.e., antisocial, borderline, and schizotypal) have modestly growing literatures.

摘要

目的

作者评估了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM - III)出版前后关于人格障碍主题的文献增长情况。

方法

对1966年至1995年发表的有关人格障碍的期刊文章进行了医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)检索。

结果

与作者的预测相反,1980年DSM - III出版后,该主题文献的增长速度比出版前要慢。其他精神病理学领域,如阿尔茨海默病和创伤后应激障碍,自1980年以来其文献的增长速度超过了DSM - III出版前的增长速度。

结论

超过半数的个体人格障碍(如表演型和被动攻击型)要么文献量极少,要么文献呈现负增长。只有三种人格障碍(即反社会型、边缘型和分裂型)的文献量有适度增长。

相似文献

1
Growth of the literature on the topic of personality disorders.关于人格障碍主题的文献增长情况。
Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Mar;157(3):472-3. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.3.472.
2
The comorbidity of borderline personality disorder and other DSM-III-R axis II personality disorders.边缘型人格障碍与其他《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订版》轴II人格障碍的共病情况。
Am J Psychiatry. 1991 Oct;148(10):1371-7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.10.1371.
3
The relationship of borderline personality disorder to posttraumatic stress disorder and traumatic events.边缘型人格障碍与创伤后应激障碍及创伤事件的关系。
Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Nov;160(11):2018-24. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.11.2018.
4
The relationship between personality and DSM-III axis I disorders in the population: results from an epidemiological survey.普通人群中人格与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版轴I障碍之间的关系:一项流行病学调查结果
Am J Psychiatry. 1992 Sep;149(9):1228-33. doi: 10.1176/ajp.149.9.1228.
5
The comorbidity of multiple personality disorder and DSM-III-R axis II disorders.多重人格障碍与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订本》轴II障碍的共病情况。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1991 Sep;14(3):547-66.
6
Identity disturbance in borderline personality disorder: an empirical investigation.边缘型人格障碍中的身份认同紊乱:一项实证研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Apr;157(4):528-41. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.4.528.
7
Personality disorders in the literature.
Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Apr;158(4):657. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.4.657.
8
Conduct disorder and personality disorders in hospitalized adolescents.住院青少年的品行障碍和人格障碍
J Clin Psychiatry. 1993 Jan;54(1):21-6.
9
Comorbidity of borderline personality disorder with other personality disorders in hospitalized adolescents and adults.住院青少年和成年人中边缘型人格障碍与其他人格障碍的共病情况。
Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Dec;157(12):2011-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.12.2011.
10
The relationship between the MCMI personality scales and DSM-III, axis II.米隆临床多轴问卷(MCMI)人格量表与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)轴II之间的关系。
J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):698-707. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674105.

引用本文的文献

1
Time perception and lived experience in personality disorders: differences across types, dimensions and severity.人格障碍中的时间感知与生活体验:不同类型、维度和严重程度的差异
PeerJ. 2025 Apr 25;13:e19403. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19403. eCollection 2025.
2
The relationship between borderline personality disorder and self-injurious/suicidal behaviors in adolescents and young adults: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.青少年和青年中边缘性人格障碍与自我伤害/自杀行为之间的关系:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 11;7(6):e2143. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2143. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Comorbidity and heterogeneity: Two challenges for personality pathology research.
共病与异质性:人格病理学研究的两大挑战。
Personal Disord. 2023 Jan;14(1):39-49. doi: 10.1037/per0000586.
4
Psychometric Properties of the Independent 36-Item PID5BF+M for ICD-11 in the Czech-Speaking Community Sample.捷克语社区样本中用于国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)的独立36项PID5BF + M的心理测量特性
Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 26;12:643270. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.643270. eCollection 2021.
5
Disorder in the Court: Cluster B Personality Disorders in United States Case Law.法庭上的紊乱:美国判例法中的B类人格障碍
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 Jun 13;25(5):706-723. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1474816. eCollection 2018.
6
Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD): In the Midst of Vulnerability, Chaos, and Awe.边缘型人格障碍(BPD):处于脆弱、混乱与敬畏之中。
Brain Sci. 2018 Nov 18;8(11):201. doi: 10.3390/brainsci8110201.
7
An Investigation into the Roles of Theory of Mind, Emotion Regulation, and Attachment Styles in Predicting the Traits of Borderline Personality Disorder.关于心理理论、情绪调节和依恋风格在预测边缘型人格障碍特征中的作用的调查。
Iran J Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;11(4):206-213.
8
The Brave New World of Personality Disorder-Trait Specified: Effects of Additional Definitions on Coverage, Prevalence, and Comorbidity.人格障碍特质明确化的全新世界:附加定义对涵盖范围、患病率及共病情况的影响
Psychopathol Rev. 2015;2(1):52-82. doi: 10.5127/pr.036314.
9
Personality disorders in DSM-5: emerging research on the alternative model.DSM-5 中的人格障碍:替代模型的新兴研究。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015 Apr;17(4):558. doi: 10.1007/s11920-015-0558-0.
10
Personality disorders as maladaptive, extreme variants of normal personality: borderline personality disorder and neuroticism in a substance using sample.人格障碍是正常人格的适应不良、极端变体:物质使用样本中的边缘型人格障碍和神经质。
J Pers Disord. 2013 Oct;27(5):625-35. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2013.27.5.625.