• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双侧内乳动脉移植的使用率和结果:系统评价和荟萃分析的见解。

Use Rate and Outcome in Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting: Insights From a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 May 17;7(11):e009361. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009361.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.118.009361
PMID:29773579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6015367/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was designed to assess whether center experience affects the short- and long-term results and the relative benefits of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting (BITA) for coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS AND RESULTS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to identify all articles reporting the outcome of BITA in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. The BITA center experience was gauged according to the percentage use of BITA in the institutional overall coronary artery bypass grafting population (%BITA). The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were operative mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction, perioperative stroke, deep sternal wound infections (DSWIs), and major postoperative adverse event. The rates of the primary and secondary outcomes were calculated after adjusting for %BITA. Primary and secondary outcomes were also compared between the BITA and the single internal thoracic artery arms in the adjusted studies. Meta-regression was used to evaluate the effect of %BITA on the primary and secondary outcomes. Thirty-four studies (27 894 patients undergoing BITA) were included. In the pooled analysis, the incidence rate for long-term mortality was 2.83% (95% confidence interval, 2.21%-3.61%). %BITA was significantly and inversely associated with long-term mortality and the rate of DSWI. In the pairwise comparison, %BITA was significantly and inversely associated with the risk of long-term mortality and DSWI in the group undergoing BITA.

CONCLUSIONS

BITA series with higher %BITA report significantly lower long-term mortality and DSWI rate as well as higher long-term survival advantage and lower relative risk of DSWI in their BITA cohort. These findings suggest that a specific volume-outcome relationship exists for BITA grafting.

摘要

背景

本荟萃分析旨在评估中心经验是否会影响双侧胸廓内动脉移植(BITA)用于冠状动脉旁路移植术的短期和长期结果以及相对益处。

方法和结果

检索 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 以确定所有报告接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者 BITA 结果的文章。根据机构内整体冠状动脉旁路移植人群中 BITA 的使用百分比(%BITA)来衡量 BITA 中心经验。主要结局是长期全因死亡率。次要结局是手术死亡率、围手术期心肌梗死、围手术期卒中、深部胸骨伤口感染(DSWI)和主要术后不良事件。在调整 %BITA 后计算主要和次要结局的发生率。在调整后的研究中,还比较了 BITA 和单根胸廓内动脉臂的主要和次要结局。使用元回归评估 %BITA 对主要和次要结局的影响。纳入 34 项研究(27894 例接受 BITA 的患者)。在汇总分析中,长期死亡率的发生率为 2.83%(95%置信区间,2.21%-3.61%)。%BITA 与长期死亡率和 DSWI 发生率呈显著负相关。在成对比较中,在接受 BITA 的组中,%BITA 与长期死亡率和 DSWI 的风险呈显著负相关。

结论

报告的 %BITA 较高的 BITA 系列报告显示,其 BITA 队列的长期死亡率和 DSWI 发生率显著降低,长期生存率优势更高,DSWI 的相对风险更低。这些发现表明 BITA 移植存在特定的量效关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aa9/6015367/9332d5fc922c/JAH3-7-e009361-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aa9/6015367/a8cfa585c6ff/JAH3-7-e009361-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aa9/6015367/aa0b7c2e0f7b/JAH3-7-e009361-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aa9/6015367/af88d8c9de81/JAH3-7-e009361-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aa9/6015367/488a0dafa9c9/JAH3-7-e009361-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aa9/6015367/9332d5fc922c/JAH3-7-e009361-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aa9/6015367/a8cfa585c6ff/JAH3-7-e009361-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aa9/6015367/aa0b7c2e0f7b/JAH3-7-e009361-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aa9/6015367/af88d8c9de81/JAH3-7-e009361-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aa9/6015367/488a0dafa9c9/JAH3-7-e009361-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7aa9/6015367/9332d5fc922c/JAH3-7-e009361-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Use Rate and Outcome in Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting: Insights From a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.双侧内乳动脉移植的使用率和结果:系统评价和荟萃分析的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 May 17;7(11):e009361. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009361.
2
Bilateral versus single internal thoracic artery for coronary artery bypass grafting with end-stage renal disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.双侧与单侧胸廓内动脉用于终末期肾病患者冠状动脉旁路移植术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Card Surg. 2019 Apr;34(4):196-201. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14010. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
3
Surgical revascularization techniques that minimize surgical risk and maximize late survival after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus.在糖尿病患者冠状动脉搭桥术中,将手术风险降至最低并使远期生存率最大化的外科血管重建技术。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Oct;148(4):1257-1264; discussion 1264-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.058. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
4
Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting is associated with significantly improved long-term survival, even among diabetic patients.双侧内乳动脉搭桥术与显著改善的长期生存率相关,即使在糖尿病患者中也是如此。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Sep;94(3):710-5; discussion 715-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.03.082. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
5
A systematic review and meta-analysis of in situ versus composite bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting.原位与复合双侧内乳动脉移植的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 May;153(5):1108-1116.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.11.027. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
6
Bilateral internal thoracic artery versus radial artery multi-arterial bypass grafting: a report from the STS database†.双侧内乳动脉与桡动脉多动脉旁路移植术:来自 STS 数据库的报告†。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Nov 1;56(5):926-934. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz106.
7
Deep sternal wound infection after bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: Insights from a Japanese national database.双侧内乳动脉移植后胸骨深部伤口感染:来自日本国家数据库的见解。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jan;157(1):166-173.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.06.101. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
8
Unmeasured Confounders in Observational Studies Comparing Bilateral Versus Single Internal Thoracic Artery for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis.观察性研究中比较双侧与单侧胸廓内动脉用于冠状动脉旁路移植术的未测量混杂因素:荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jan 6;7(1):e008010. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008010.
9
Outcomes associated with bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: the importance of age.双侧内乳动脉移植术的结果:年龄的重要性。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Oct;92(4):1269-75; discussion 1275-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.05.083.
10
Perioperative outcomes of off-pump minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting with bilateral internal thoracic arteries under direct vision†.直视下非体外循环双侧胸廓内动脉微创冠状动脉旁路移植术的围手术期结果†
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 May 1;24(5):696-701. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw431.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of bilateral internal mammary artery grafting in patients with mildly decreased renal function.双侧乳内动脉移植对轻度肾功能减退患者的影响。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s11748-025-02184-5.
2
Conduits and Strategies for Arterial Revascularization in CABG.冠状动脉旁路移植术中动脉血运重建的管道与策略
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 30;24(7):188. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2407188. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
The ROMA trial: 7 years of trial activities and the development of the ROMA trial network.ROMA试验:7年的试验活动及ROMA试验网络的发展

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized Trial of Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts.随机对照试验:双侧与单侧胸廓内动脉桥血管移植的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 29;375(26):2540-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610021. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
2
Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Configuration for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial.冠状动脉搭桥手术中双侧胸廓内动脉构型:一项前瞻性随机试验
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul;9(7):e003518. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003518.
3
Is Bilateral Internal Mammary Arterial Grafting Beneficial for Patients Aged 75 Years or Older?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 May 3;65(5). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae188.
4
Impact of Center Volume on Cardiopulmonary and Mortality Outcomes after Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors for Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.癌症免疫检查点抑制剂治疗后中心治疗量对心肺及死亡率结局的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 13;16(6):1136. doi: 10.3390/cancers16061136.
5
Reconstruction Technique Options for Achieving Total Arterial Revascularization and Multiple Arterial Grafting.实现全动脉血运重建和多动脉搭桥的重建技术选择
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 15;12(6):2275. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062275.
6
Angiographic Outcomes for Arterial and Venous Conduits Used in CABG.冠状动脉旁路移植术中使用的动脉和静脉血管移植物的血管造影结果。
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 3;12(5):2022. doi: 10.3390/jcm12052022.
7
Evidence-based selection of the second and third arterial conduit.基于证据的第二和第三动脉管道选择
JTCVS Open. 2020 Nov 25;5:66-69. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2020.11.009. eCollection 2021 Mar.
8
Commentary: 1, 2 or 3 arterial grafts? One is not enough!评论:1、2 还是 3 根动脉移植物?一根可不够!
JTCVS Open. 2020 Nov 25;5:72-73. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2020.11.004. eCollection 2021 Mar.
9
Commentary: Total-arterial, anaortic revascularization, and the boutique practice of coronary surgery.评论:全动脉化、无主动脉冠状动脉血运重建及冠状动脉外科的精品实践
JTCVS Tech. 2021 Oct 14;10:151-152. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.10.013. eCollection 2021 Dec.
10
Multiple Arterial Grafting: For Every Patient and Every Surgeon?多重动脉移植:适用于每位患者和每位外科医生吗?
Innovations (Phila). 2021 May-Jun;16(3):214-215. doi: 10.1177/1556984521996333. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
双侧乳内动脉移植对75岁及以上患者有益吗?
Circ J. 2016 Jul 25;80(8):1756-63. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0181. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
4
Outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery in the United States based on hospital volume, 2007 to 2011.2007年至2011年美国冠状动脉搭桥手术患者基于医院手术量的治疗结果
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jun;151(6):1686-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.01.050. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
5
Myocardial Revascularization Exclusively With Bilateral Internal Thoracic Arteries in T-Graft Configuration: Effects on Late Survival.采用T型移植构型仅使用双侧胸廓内动脉进行心肌血运重建:对远期生存的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 May;101(5):1775-81. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.074. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
6
Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery with bilateral or single internal mammary artery grafts.杂交冠状动脉血运重建术与双侧或单根内乳动脉旁路移植术治疗冠心病的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Apr;151(4):1081-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.061. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
7
Arterial coronary artery bypass grafting is safe and effective in elderly patients.动脉冠状动脉旁路移植术在老年患者中是安全有效的。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;150(3):607-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.06.032. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
8
Off-pump bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafting in patients with chronic kidney disease.慢性肾脏病患者的非体外循环双侧带蒂内乳动脉旁路移植术。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Aug;150(2):315-21.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.04.058. Epub 2015 May 9.
9
Impact of pump status and conduit choice in coronary artery bypass: A 15-year follow-up study in 1412 propensity-matched patients.冠状动脉旁路移植中泵状态和导管选择的影响:1412 例倾向匹配患者 15 年随访研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Apr;149(4):1027-33.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.12.031. Epub 2014 Dec 20.
10
The influence of bilateral internal mammary arteries on short- and long-term outcomes: a propensity score matching in accordance with current recommendations.双侧乳内动脉对短期和长期预后的影响:根据当前建议进行倾向评分匹配。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;148(6):2699-705. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.08.021. Epub 2014 Aug 14.