Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Contact Dermatitis. 2018 Sep;79(3):127-135. doi: 10.1111/cod.13003. Epub 2018 May 17.
Sickness absence in hand eczema patients has been associated with stress rather than disease severity, indicating that personal aspects regarding hand eczema should be investigated further.
To examine whether patient education vs treatment as usual can influence behaviour and knowledge regarding skin protection and care, as well as personal resources, in patients with occupational hand eczema.
PREVEX is an individually randomized clinical trial investigating the 1-year effects of a simple, low-cost group-counselling programme vs treatment as usual for patients with notified occupational hand eczema. Exploratory outcomes were behaviour, knowledge, self-efficacy, and self-evaluated skin care ability.
In total, 1668 patients with notified occupational skin disease were invited to participate, of whom 769 were randomized and 756 were analysed: intervention group (n = 376) vs control group (n = 380). Behaviour was improved and the knowledge score increased in the intervention group as compared with the control group (respectively: estimate 0.08; 95%CI: 0.02-0.19; P = .01; and estimate 0.49; 95%CI: 0.28-0.70; P < .001). Self-efficacy was lower in the intervention group as compared with the control group (estimate -0.78; 95%CI: -1.25 to -0.30; P = .001). No difference was found regarding skin care abilities.
The intervention had a positive influence on 1-year behaviour and knowledge, but was insufficient to result in long-term positive changes in personal resources regarding dealing with hand eczema.
手部湿疹患者的病假与压力有关,而与疾病严重程度无关,这表明应进一步研究与手部湿疹相关的个人方面。
研究患者教育与常规治疗相比是否可以影响职业性手部湿疹患者的皮肤保护和护理行为以及知识,以及个人资源。
PREVEX 是一项个体随机临床试验,研究了为期 1 年的简单、低成本小组咨询方案对通知的职业性手部湿疹患者的常规治疗的影响。探索性结局是行为、知识、自我效能和自我评估的皮肤护理能力。
共邀请了 1668 名患有通知性职业性皮肤病的患者参加,其中 769 名被随机分配,756 名进行了分析:干预组(n=376)与对照组(n=380)。与对照组相比,干预组的行为得到改善,知识得分增加(分别为:估计值 0.08;95%CI:0.02-0.19;P=0.01;和估计值 0.49;95%CI:0.28-0.70;P<0.001)。与对照组相比,干预组的自我效能感较低(估计值-0.78;95%CI:-1.25 至-0.30;P=0.001)。在皮肤护理能力方面没有差异。
干预对 1 年的行为和知识产生了积极影响,但不足以导致处理手部湿疹的个人资源发生长期积极变化。