Forest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 47, AA Wageningen, 6700, Netherlands.
Coordenação de Pesquisa em Biodiversidade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Caixa Postal 2223, CEP 69008-971, Manaus, Brazil.
New Phytol. 2018 Jul;219(1):109-121. doi: 10.1111/nph.15206. Epub 2018 May 18.
The functional trait approach has, as a central tenet, that plant traits are functional and shape individual performance, but this has rarely been tested in the field. Here, we tested the individual-based trait approach in a hyperdiverse Amazonian tropical rainforest and evaluated intraspecific variation in trait values, plant strategies at the individual level, and whether traits are functional and predict individual performance. We evaluated > 1300 tree saplings belonging to > 383 species, measured 25 traits related to growth and defense, and evaluated the effects of environmental conditions, plant size, and traits on stem growth. A total of 44% of the trait variation was observed within species, indicating a strong potential for acclimation. Individuals showed two strategy spectra, related to tissue toughness and organ size vs leaf display. In this nutrient- and light-limited forest, traits measured at the individual level were surprisingly poor predictors of individual growth performance because of convergence of traits and growth rates. Functional trait approaches based on individuals or species are conceptually fundamentally different: the species-based approach focuses on the potential and the individual-based approach on the realized traits and growth rates. Counterintuitively, the individual approach leads to a poor prediction of individual performance, although it provides a more realistic view on community dynamics.
功能性状方法的一个核心原则是,植物性状是功能性的,并且塑造个体表现,但这在野外很少得到验证。在这里,我们在一个超多样的亚马逊热带雨林中测试了基于个体的性状方法,并评估了种内性状值、个体水平的植物策略以及性状是否具有功能性和预测个体表现的变化。我们评估了属于>383 种的>1300 个树苗,测量了与生长和防御相关的 25 个性状,并评估了环境条件、植物大小和性状对茎生长的影响。在物种内观察到了 44%的性状变异,表明有很强的适应潜力。个体表现出两种策略谱,与组织韧性和器官大小与叶片展示有关。在这个养分和光照受限的森林中,个体水平上测量的性状令人惊讶地不能很好地预测个体生长表现,因为性状和生长速率的趋同。基于个体或物种的功能性状方法在概念上有根本的不同:基于物种的方法侧重于潜在的性状,而基于个体的方法则侧重于实现的性状和生长速率。与直觉相反的是,尽管个体方法提供了对群落动态的更现实的看法,但它导致对个体表现的预测不佳。