Suppr超能文献

分光光度法皮内分析与激光多普勒成像在评估成人及小儿烧伤创面中的比较评价

A comparative evaluation of spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis and laser doppler imaging in the assessment of adult and paediatric burn injuries.

作者信息

Charuvila Somy, Singh Masha, Collins Declan, Jones Isabel

机构信息

Imperial College London, Kensington, London, UK.

Burns Unit, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Rd, Chelsea, London, UK.

出版信息

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018 Jul;71(7):1015-1022. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 29.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Clinical assessment of mid-dermal burns can be challenging. Currently, laser Doppler imaging (LDI) is the gold standard adjunct in the assessment of burn injuries. Although LDI has demonstrated reliable accuracy, it poses various limitations in routine use including cost and ease of use. In comparison, spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis (SIA) is a relatively cheaper technique, which can be carried out using a modified digital camera that enables easy image acquisition. We aim to compare the accuracy of the two modalities in the assessment of mid-dermal burn injuries.

METHODS

We recruited 29 patients with mid-dermal burns presenting within 2 to 5 days post burn. Forty-five burn regions of interest were identified, and the patients underwent imaging using both the modalities. Subsequent clinical outcome was followed up and showed that treatment remained unaffected by participation. Two clinicians then independently predicted the healing potential of each burn region retrospectively as per images from either modality.

RESULTS

McNemar's test indicated that there is no significant difference between the accuracy of the two modalities (p = 0.61).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the accuracy of SIA is comparable to that of LDI. Our experience with SIA indicates its potential as a cost-effective and user-friendly adjunct in decision-making.

摘要

引言

真皮中层烧伤的临床评估具有挑战性。目前,激光多普勒成像(LDI)是烧伤评估中的金标准辅助手段。尽管LDI已证明具有可靠的准确性,但它在常规使用中存在各种局限性,包括成本和易用性。相比之下,分光光度法皮内分析(SIA)是一种相对便宜的技术,可以使用改良的数码相机进行,便于图像采集。我们旨在比较这两种方法在评估真皮中层烧伤损伤方面的准确性。

方法

我们招募了29例真皮中层烧伤患者,烧伤后2至5天内就诊。确定了45个烧伤感兴趣区域,患者对两种方法均进行了成像。随后对临床结果进行了随访,结果表明治疗不受参与情况的影响。然后,两名临床医生根据两种方法中的任何一种的图像,独立回顾性预测每个烧伤区域的愈合潜力。

结果

McNemar检验表明,两种方法的准确性之间没有显著差异(p = 0.61)。

结论

结果表明,SIA的准确性与LDI相当。我们使用SIA的经验表明,它有潜力成为一种经济高效且用户友好的决策辅助手段。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验