Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Nutrition, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Sep;36(9):1031-1041. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0671-0.
The objective of this study was to review available health economic evaluations of PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) inhibitors. These drugs reduce low-density lipid cholesterol levels and cardiovascular risk, but their cost effectiveness has been questioned. We searched Medline and Embase for economic evaluations in any language at any time. Studies were included if they analysed any PCSK9 inhibitor compared with either statin alone or in combination with ezetimibe or any other therapy considered standard prior to the introduction of PCSK9 inhibitors. We found ten full health economic evaluations of PCSK9 inhibitors, two from Europe and eight from the United States (US). Six of the eight from the US were from two different consortia that analysed PCSK9 inhibitors at different stages through the development of evidence. All studies generally reported incremental cost-effectiveness ratios above suggested thresholds for cost effectiveness, except one study from Spain. The results of this review indicate that PCSK9 inhibitors in general are not cost effective at the current prices, but lower prices may change the results.
本研究旨在回顾已有的 PCSK9(脯氨酰肽酶原转化酶枯草溶菌素 9)抑制剂的健康经济学评价。这些药物可降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平并降低心血管风险,但它们的成本效益一直受到质疑。我们检索了 Medline 和 Embase 中任何语言、任何时间发表的经济学评价。如果研究分析了任何 PCSK9 抑制剂与单独使用他汀类药物或与依折麦布或在 PCSK9 抑制剂引入之前被认为是标准疗法的任何其他疗法进行比较,我们将其纳入研究。我们共找到了十篇关于 PCSK9 抑制剂的完整健康经济学评价,其中两篇来自欧洲,八篇来自美国(US)。来自美国的八篇中的六篇来自两个不同的联盟,它们在证据的不同发展阶段分析了 PCSK9 抑制剂。除了一项来自西班牙的研究外,所有研究通常报告的增量成本效益比都高于成本效益的建议阈值。本综述的结果表明,在目前的价格下,PCSK9 抑制剂总体上没有成本效益,但较低的价格可能会改变结果。