• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依泽替米贝、依洛尤单抗、阿利西尤单抗、二十碳五烯酸乙酯或非诺贝特联合他汀类药物与他汀类药物单药治疗相比的成本效益。

Cost-Effectiveness of Icosapent Ethyl, Evolocumab, Alirocumab, Ezetimibe, or Fenofibrate in Combination with Statins Compared to Statin Monotherapy.

机构信息

Fifth Department of Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Department of Personalized Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Drug Investig. 2022 Aug;42(8):643-656. doi: 10.1007/s40261-022-01173-3. Epub 2022 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1007/s40261-022-01173-3
PMID:35819632
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9338124/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite treatment with statins, dyslipidaemia patients with elevated cholesterol- and triglyceride-levels remain at high residual risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). New lipid-lowering drugs must prevent the occurrence of MACE and exhibit cost-effectiveness for their successful adoption to clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the cost effectiveness of icosapent ethyl, fenofibrate, ezetimibe, evolocumab, and alirocumab in combination with statins compared to statin monotherapy for cardiovascular prevention from the perspective of UK's National Health Service.

METHODS

A Markov model simulated the progression of cardiovascular disease and MACE, including myocardial infarction, stroke, angina pectoris, and coronary revascularisation, in dyslipidaemia patients. The model was populated with cardiovascular outcome trial data for each drug. Cost and utility data were extracted from peer-reviewed literature. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) is reported per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained in 2021 Great Britain Pounds (£).

RESULTS

For primary cardiovascular prevention, icosapent ethyl increased QALYs by 0.79 and costs by £15,421 compared to statin monotherapy (ICER = £19,485/QALY). Fenofibrate yielded 0.62 additional QALYs at cost-savings of - £6127 (ICER = - £9932/QALY). For secondary prevention, the omega-3 fatty acid icosapent ethyl extended QALYs by 0.98 at costs of £12,981 compared to statin monotherapy (ICER = £13,285/QALY). Fenofibrate added 0.85 QALYs whilst saving - £637 (ICER = - £7472/QALY). Ezetimibe increased QALYs by 0.60 at cost reductions of - £2529 (ICER = - £4231/QALY). PCSK9 inhibitors provided QALYs of 0.53 and 0.86 at costs of £45,279 and £46,375 for evolocumab (ICER = £85,193/QALY) and alirocumab (ICER = £54,211/QALY), respectively. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of £25,000/QALY, there is a probability of 100% for icosapent ethyl (98% in primary prevention) and 0% for PCSK9 inhibitors to be cost effective in secondary prevention.

CONCLUSIONS

Icosapent ethyl is cost effective for primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention at an annual price of £2064 in the UK. For PCSK9 inhibitors, price discounts or prescription restrictions are necessary to achieve cost effectiveness.

摘要

背景

尽管使用了他汀类药物,胆固醇和甘油三酯水平升高的血脂异常患者在发生主要不良心血管事件(MACE)方面仍存在较高的残余风险。新的降脂药物必须预防 MACE 的发生,并在成本效益方面具有优势,才能成功应用于临床实践。

目的

从英国国家医疗服务体系的角度评估埃扎替韦单抗、非诺贝特、依折麦布、依洛尤单抗和阿利西尤单抗与他汀类药物联合治疗与他汀类药物单药治疗在心血管预防方面的成本效益。

方法

一个马尔可夫模型模拟了血脂异常患者心血管疾病和 MACE(包括心肌梗死、中风、心绞痛和冠状动脉血运重建)的进展。该模型使用了每种药物的心血管结局试验数据进行填充。成本和效用数据从同行评议的文献中提取。增量成本效益比(ICER)以 2021 年英国英镑(£)表示的每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本进行报告。

结果

对于一级心血管预防,与他汀类药物单药治疗相比,二十碳五烯酸乙酯增加了 0.79 个 QALYs,成本增加了 15,421 英镑(ICER = £19,485/QALY)。非诺贝特在节省成本 - £6127 的情况下增加了 0.62 个额外的 QALYs(ICER = - £9932/QALY)。对于二级预防,欧米伽-3 脂肪酸二十碳五烯酸乙酯与他汀类药物单药治疗相比,将 QALYs 延长了 0.98 个,成本增加了 12,981 英镑(ICER = £13,285/QALY)。非诺贝特增加了 0.85 个 QALYs,同时节省了 - £637(ICER = - £7472/QALY)。依折麦布降低成本 - £2529,增加了 0.60 个 QALYs(ICER = - £4231/QALY)。PCSK9 抑制剂在 Evolocumab (ICER = £85,193/QALY)和 Alirocumab (ICER = £54,211/QALY)的成本分别为 £45,279 和 £46,375 时,提供了 0.53 和 0.86 的 QALYs。在支付意愿阈值为 25,000 英镑/QALY 时,埃扎替韦单抗(98%在二级预防中)和 PCSK9 抑制剂有 100%的概率具有成本效益。

结论

在英国,埃扎替韦单抗的年度价格为 2064 英镑时,在一级和二级心血管预防方面具有成本效益。对于 PCSK9 抑制剂,需要降低价格或限制处方,才能实现成本效益。

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Icosapent Ethyl, Evolocumab, Alirocumab, Ezetimibe, or Fenofibrate in Combination with Statins Compared to Statin Monotherapy.依泽替米贝、依洛尤单抗、阿利西尤单抗、二十碳五烯酸乙酯或非诺贝特联合他汀类药物与他汀类药物单药治疗相比的成本效益。
Clin Drug Investig. 2022 Aug;42(8):643-656. doi: 10.1007/s40261-022-01173-3. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Lipid-Lowering Therapies for Cardiovascular Prevention in Germany.降脂治疗在德国心血管预防中的成本效益。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023 Aug;37(4):683-694. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07310-y. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
3
The cost-effectiveness of icosapent ethyl in combination with statin therapy compared with statin alone for cardiovascular risk reduction.依折麦布辛伐他汀与他汀类药物联合治疗与他汀类药物单药治疗相比在降低心血管风险方面的成本效益。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Jul 23;28(8):897-904. doi: 10.1177/2047487319896648. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
4
Cost-effectiveness of PCSK9 Inhibitor Therapy in Patients With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia or Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.载脂蛋白 B 代谢途径抑制剂治疗杂合子型家族性高胆固醇血症或动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者的成本效果分析。
JAMA. 2016 Aug 16;316(7):743-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.11004.
5
Comparison of Evolocumab and Ezetimibe, Both Combined with Statin Therapy, for Patients with Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from the Chinese Healthcare Perspective.依洛尤单抗或依折麦布联合他汀类药物治疗近期急性冠脉综合征患者的成本效果分析:基于中国医疗保健视角。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023 Oct;37(5):905-916. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07276-x. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
6
Cost-effectiveness of adding ezetimibe and/or PCSK9 inhibitors to high-dose statins for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Chinese adults.依折麦布和/或 PCSK9 抑制剂联合大剂量他汀类药物用于中国成年人心血管疾病二级预防的成本效果分析。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Aug 31;39(1):e53. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000296.
7
Established and Emerging Lipid-Lowering Drugs for Primary and Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention.用于一级和二级心血管预防的既定和新兴降脂药物。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2023 Sep;23(5):477-495. doi: 10.1007/s40256-023-00594-5. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Alirocumab: A Just-in-Time Analysis Based on the ODYSSEY Outcomes Trial.依洛尤单抗的成本效益:基于 ODYSSEY 结果试验的及时分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Feb 19;170(4):221-229. doi: 10.7326/M18-1776. Epub 2019 Jan 1.
9
The cost-effectiveness of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids - The Australian healthcare perspective.ω-3 多不饱和脂肪酸的成本效益 - 澳大利亚医疗保健视角。
Eur J Intern Med. 2019 Sep;67:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
10
A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness of Non-Statin Lipid-Lowering Drugs for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.他汀类药物以外的降脂药用于 2 型糖尿病患者心血管疾病一级和二级预防的成本效益的系统评价。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023 Aug;48(8):101211. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101211. Epub 2022 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Indirect comparison of the efficacy and safety of alirocumab and evolocumab on major cardiovascular events: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.阿利西尤单抗与依洛尤单抗对主要心血管事件疗效和安全性的间接比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 24;16:1555508. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1555508. eCollection 2025.
2
Therapeutic Management of LDL-C: Efficacy and Economic Impact Assessment.低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的治疗管理:疗效与经济影响评估。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 May 20;12(5):196. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12050196.
3
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Evolocumab or Inclisiran in Combination with Statins Versus Statin Monotherapy Among Patients with ASCVD in China.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Icosapent Ethyl (IPE) for the Reduction of the Risk of Ischemic Cardiovascular Events in Canada.二十碳五烯酸乙酯(IPE)降低加拿大缺血性心血管事件风险的成本效益分析
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Apr 20;15:295-308. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S377935. eCollection 2023.
2
Value and Price of Multi-indication Cancer Drugs in the USA, Germany, France, England, Canada, Australia, and Scotland.美国、德国、法国、英国、加拿大、澳大利亚和苏格兰的多适应症癌症药物的价值和价格。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Sep;20(5):757-768. doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00737-w. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
3
Initial and supplementary indication approval of new targeted cancer drugs by the FDA, EMA, Health Canada, and TGA.
在中国动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)患者中,依洛尤单抗或英克西兰与他汀类药物联合使用对比他汀类药物单药治疗的成本效益分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Sep;23(5):855-867. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00971-y. Epub 2025 May 5.
4
Assessing Omega-3 Therapy and Its Cardiovascular Benefits: What About Icosapent Ethyl? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.评估ω-3疗法及其心血管益处:二十碳五烯酸乙酯情况如何?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Apr 20;18(4):601. doi: 10.3390/ph18040601.
5
Cost-effectiveness of Evolocumab in Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review.依洛尤单抗在心血管疾病中的成本效益:一项系统评价
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2024 Sep 1;101:100758. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2024.100758. eCollection 2024.
6
Safety and Effectiveness of High-Intensity Statins Versus Low/Moderate-Intensity Statins Plus Ezetimibe in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease for Reaching LDL-C Goals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.高强度他汀类药物与低/中强度他汀类药物联合依折麦布在达到 LDL-C 目标的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者中的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2024 Aug;47(8):e24334. doi: 10.1002/clc.24334.
7
PCSK9 inhibition: from effectiveness to cost-effectiveness.前蛋白转化酶枯草溶菌素9(PCSK9)抑制:从有效性到成本效益
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jun 25;11:1339487. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1339487. eCollection 2024.
8
Are We Using Ezetimibe As Much As We Should?我们是否在合理使用依泽替米贝?
Biomark Insights. 2024 May 31;19:11772719241257410. doi: 10.1177/11772719241257410. eCollection 2024.
9
Present and Future of Dyslipidaemia Treatment-A Review.血脂异常治疗的现状与未来——综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 8;12(18):5839. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185839.
10
Projected Outcomes of Optimized Statin and Ezetimibe Therapy in US Military Veterans with Coronary Artery Disease.优化他汀类药物和依折麦布治疗对美国冠心病退伍军人的预期结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2329066. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29066.
美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)、欧洲药品管理局(EMA)、加拿大卫生部(Health Canada)和澳大利亚治疗用品管理局(TGA)对新型靶向抗癌药物的初始和补充适应证批准。
Invest New Drugs. 2022 Aug;40(4):798-809. doi: 10.1007/s10637-022-01227-5. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Lipid-Lowering Therapies for Cardiovascular Prevention in Germany.降脂治疗在德国心血管预防中的成本效益。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023 Aug;37(4):683-694. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07310-y. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
5
Incremental net benefit of lipid-lowering therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-utility studies.PCSK9 抑制剂降脂治疗的增量净效益:成本效益研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Mar;78(3):351-363. doi: 10.1007/s00228-021-03242-6. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
6
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice.2021年欧洲心脏病学会临床实践中心血管疾病预防指南。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 7;42(34):3227-3337. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484.
7
The cost-effectiveness of icosapent ethyl in combination with statin therapy compared with statin alone for cardiovascular risk reduction.依折麦布辛伐他汀与他汀类药物联合治疗与他汀类药物单药治疗相比在降低心血管风险方面的成本效益。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Jul 23;28(8):897-904. doi: 10.1177/2047487319896648. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
8
Dose-Dependent Risk Reduction for Myocardial Infarction with Eicosapentaenoic Acid: a Meta-analysis and Meta-regression Including the STRENGTH Trial.二十碳五烯酸对心肌梗死的剂量依赖性风险降低:一项包括STRENGTH试验的荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2021 Oct;35(5):1079-1081. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07212-z. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
9
Ethnic inequalities in health-related quality of life among older adults in England: secondary analysis of a national cross-sectional survey.英格兰老年人健康相关生活质量的种族不平等:一项全国性横断面调查的二次分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Mar;6(3):e145-e154. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30287-5. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
10
PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.用于心血管疾病一级和二级预防的前蛋白转化酶枯草溶菌素9单克隆抗体。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 20;10(10):CD011748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011748.pub3.