Genito-Urinary Cancer Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Belfast-Manchester Movember Centre of Excellence, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
BJU Int. 2019 Jan;123(1):65-73. doi: 10.1111/bju.14400. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
To determine the prognostic relevance of non-regional lymph node (NRLN) metastases presenting synchronously with bone metastases in metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) for guiding treatment decisions based on oligometastatic definitions.
Patients diagnosed with mPCa between 2004 and 2013 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database and were grouped by metastatic sites into only NRLN, only bone, bone + NRLN and other sites ± bone/NRLN metastases. Multivariate Cox and competing risk regression analyses were performed to compare the risks of all-cause mortality (ACM) and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) associated with bone + NRLN metastases before and after propensity-score matching to patients with only bone metastases. This was complemented with landmark and supplementary analyses.
Of 17 167 patients with mPCa identified, 63.1% presented with only bone metastases, while bone and NRLN metastases co-occurred in 8.9% of the cohort. On multivariate analyses, after adjusting for potential confounders (clinical and sociodemographic), patients with bone + NRLN metastases had a significantly higher risk of ACM (hazard ratio [HR] 1.161, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.084-1.243; P < 0.001) and PCSM (subdistribution HR 1.149, 95% CI 1.067-1.237; P < 0.001) compared with patients with only bone metastases. Landmark analyses limited to survivors of ≥6 and ≥12 months again showed a significantly increased risk of ACM for patients presenting with bone + NRLN metastases compared with patients with only bone metastases. In a subsequent 1:1 propensity-score-matched cohort of patients with bone + NRLN metastases and only bone metastases, the bone + NRLN group had higher multivariate-adjusted hazard rates for ACM (HR 1.202, 95% CI 1.102-1.311; P < 0.001) and PCSM (subdistribution HR 1.146, 95% CI 1.044-1.259; P = 0.004).
Patients with concomitant NRLN and bone metastases have a higher risk of death, NRLN and bone metastases therefore representing a high-risk feature, when compared with patients with bone metastases alone. The current therapeutic stratification of 'low-' vs 'high-volume' disease does not account for this phenomenon, and patients requiring aggressive combination therapy may not receive maximum therapeutic benefit as a consequence.
确定转移性前列腺癌(mPCa)中与骨转移同时出现的非区域性淋巴结(NRLN)转移的预后相关性,以便根据寡转移定义指导治疗决策。
从监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中确定了 2004 年至 2013 年间诊断为 mPCa 的患者,并根据转移部位将其分为仅 NRLN、仅骨、骨+NRLN 和其他部位±骨/NRLN 转移。使用多变量 Cox 和竞争风险回归分析比较了骨+NRLN 转移与仅骨转移患者在倾向评分匹配前后与全因死亡率(ACM)和前列腺癌特异性死亡率(PCSM)相关的风险。这与里程碑和补充分析相补充。
在确定的 17167 例 mPCa 患者中,63.1%仅表现为骨转移,而骨和 NRLN 转移同时发生在队列中的 8.9%。在多变量分析中,在调整了潜在混杂因素(临床和社会人口统计学)后,与仅骨转移患者相比,骨+NRLN 转移患者的 ACM(风险比[HR]1.161,95%置信区间[CI]1.084-1.243;P<0.001)和 PCSM(亚分布 HR 1.149,95%CI 1.067-1.237;P<0.001)风险显著更高。限制幸存者≥6 个月和≥12 个月的里程碑分析再次显示,与仅骨转移患者相比,骨+NRLN 转移患者的 ACM 风险显著增加。在随后的 1:1 倾向评分匹配的骨+NRLN 转移和仅骨转移患者队列中,骨+NRLN 组的 ACM(HR 1.202,95%CI 1.102-1.311;P<0.001)和 PCSM(亚分布 HR 1.146,95%CI 1.044-1.259;P=0.004)的多变量调整风险率更高。
与仅骨转移患者相比,同时存在 NRLN 和骨转移的患者死亡风险更高,NRLN 和骨转移因此代表了一种高风险特征。目前的“低容量”与“高容量”疾病的治疗分层没有考虑到这一现象,因此可能不会使需要积极联合治疗的患者获得最大的治疗效益。